Head to head
Phi Guard vs Maginary
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics
Full listingNo reviews yet
AI image + video generation for agents: --flag prompt DSL, async generate/poll, x402 pay-per-use.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Phi Guard (92/100 against 83). Maginary is hosted and callable through the gateway; Phi Guard runs on your own machine.
| Phi Guard | Maginary | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 90 | 1.2k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | 16 |
| Write actions | — | 6 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |