Head to head
Phi Guard vs Edgehound
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics
Full listing
No reviews yet
Writes adversarial test suites for AI-built code. Your agent's test engineer.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 97 out of 100). Edgehound is hosted and callable through the gateway; Phi Guard runs on your own machine.
| Phi Guard | Edgehound | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 90 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |