Mmcp.market

Head to head

Phi Guard vs MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Phi Guardio.github.Abidit/phi-guard-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics

Full listing
MCPcom.decionis/mcp
A
No reviews yet

Authorize consequential AI agent actions before execution

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 99 out of 100). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Phi Guard runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 Phi GuardMCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100A99/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0533
Downloads / week90297
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools2—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Phi Guard vs Agent-Native AnalyticsPhi Guard vs HOL GuardPhi Guard vs prompt-protectionPhi Guard vs mcpmPhi Guard vs haiku.ragAll AI and agents servers