Mmcp.market

Head to head

Phi Guard vs Basic Memory

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Phi Guardio.github.Abidit/phi-guard-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics

Full listing
Basic Memoryio.github.basicmachines-co/basic-memory
C
No reviews yet

Local-first knowledge management with bi-directional LLM sync via Markdown files.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Phi Guard (92/100 against 60). Basic Memory has noticeably more public adoption.

 Phi GuardBasic Memory
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100C60/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars04.0k
Downloads / week906.0k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools223
Write actions—4
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITAGPL-3.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-16
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Phi Guard vs Agent-Native AnalyticsPhi Guard vs HOL GuardPhi Guard vs prompt-protectionPhi Guard vs Linksee MemoryPhi Guard vs ImageAll AI and agents servers