Head to head
webclaw vs Tinysearch
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web scraping, search, crawling, structured extraction and research for AI agents.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours webclaw (92/100 against 82). webclaw is hosted and callable through the gateway; Tinysearch runs on your own machine.
| webclaw | Tinysearch | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 2.4k | 233 |
| Downloads / week | 137 | 84 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-10-08 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |