Mmcp.market

windows-ad skill

by zhaoxuya520·zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill·39k stars·MIT

Use for authorized Active Directory and Windows identity attacks including Kerberos, AD CS, BloodHound paths, NTLM relay, and domain privilege escalation research.

A100/100content scan

Is the windows-ad skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 2 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.

No findings.

Install the windows-ad skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description. 

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill.git /tmp/reverse-skill
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/reverse-skill/skills/windows-ad ~/.claude/skills/windows-ad
available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

Windows / Active Directory Security

ACTION REQUIRED（读完后立刻执行）

  1. NOW: 读取 ../field-journal/precedent-pentest.md
  2. NOW: 域/AD 测试必须明确授权范围（含 DC、是否允许投毒/中继）
  3. NOW: case-init；network_profile 与禁止动作写清
  4. NEXT: tool-index（impacket/certipy/bloodhound 等常手动）
  5. ACT: 从身份枚举与 BloodHound 图开始，不先上破坏性利用

适用场景

  • 域渗透、Kerberoasting、AS-REP、委派
  • AD CS（ESC1–ESC8 等）证书攻击
  • BloodHound / SharpHound 攻击路径
  • NTLM Relay / Coercer 强制认证
  • 本地提权到域路径（Potato 等作为跳板）

与 attack-chain 关系

  • 多阶段从外网到域控 → PRIMARY 可仍是 attack-chain/，本 skill 为 AD 专科
  • 已在域内专注身份 → PRIMARY = 本 skill

工作流

1. 枚举

# 示例 Impacket / 内置（需凭据与授权）
nxc smb <range> -u user -p pass
bloodhound-python -d domain.local -u user -p pass -c All -ns <DC>

2. 常见路径（先图后枪）

□ Kerberoast / AS-REP → 离线破解
□ ACL 滥用（GenericAll/WriteDacl）
□ 委派（非约束/约束/基于资源）
□ AD CS 模板错误 → Certipy
□ 中继：LLMNR/NBT-NS + ntlmrelayx（确认授权）

3. 凭证与横向

□ secretsdump / lsassy / mimikatz（严格授权与清理）
□ PtH / PtT / 黄金票仅在授权红队范围
□ 每步写 Evidence；高危等用户确认

工具链

参考

  • references/ad-attack-paths.md
  • ../pentest-tools/references/network-attack-defense.md
  • ../attack-chain/
  • seeds: field-journal/seed-005ad-certipy-esc1.md seed-007ntlm-relay-coercer.md seed-013_kerberoasting-spn.md

路由上下文

上游: MASTER R24 下游: 报告 docs-generator；需 EDR 研究 edr-bypass-re MUST NOT: 无授权 DCSync / 黄金票打生产

任务完成自检

  • [ ] 是否先有图/枚举再有利用？
  • [ ] 是否记录可复现命令并脱敏？
  • [ ] 是否遵守 scope 禁止项？
  • [ ] Checklist？

More skills from zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill

  • Fapi-securityUse for authorized security assessment of REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, or SOAP APIs, including discovery, authentication, authorization, rate-limit, and CI/CD testing.
  • Capk-reverse在 CLI 环境下做 Android APK 逆向时使用。适用于 APK 解包、Java 反编译、smali 修改、重打包、Frida 动态 Hook，以及按需切换到 so/native 分析。优先使用本机已安装的 jadx、apktool、frida、adb、ida-reverse、radare2。
  • Cattack-chainUse for authorized multi-stage attack-path planning and orchestration when a task spans reconnaissance, initial access, privilege escalation, lateral movement, or impact assessment. Route single-stage tasks directly to their specialist skill.
  • Abinary-diff跨版本符号迁移与二进制差分。当你有旧版本的符号/逆向结果，需要快速迁移到新版本时使用。 适用场景：内核缺 PDB 用旧版符号推导、程序更新后批量迁移函数名、应用更新后快速定位新偏移。 核心方法：用 LLM 做结构化差异比对，程序化输入输出，成本极低（200 函数 ~1 元）。 触发关键词：符号迁移、bindiff、跨版本、PDB 缺失、函数偏移迁移、symbol migration、binary diff、版本对比。
  • Abinary-ninja-reverseUse for authorized binary analysis in Binary Ninja, including HLIL/MLIL/LLIL inspection, strings/imports/exports, cross-references, types, patch review, Python API automation, and optional Binary Ninja MCP or localhost HTTP integration.
  • Abrowser-automation统一自动化入口。覆盖浏览器自动化（Playwright）和 Windows 桌面应用自动化（OpenReverse）。 浏览器场景：打开网页、点击、填表、爬取、截图、自动化登录、渗透页面交互。 桌面场景：操作 IDA/x64dbg 等 GUI 工具、Windows UI Automation、视觉驱动交互、桌面应用网络抓包。 触发关键词：浏览器自动化、桌面自动化、打开网页、填表、爬取、截图、自动化登录、Playwright、agent-browser、headless、OpenReverse、UIA、CUA、桌面操作、Windows 自动化。
  • Abrowser-extension-reverseUse for authorized reverse engineering of browser extensions (Chrome/Firefox) including manifest analysis, background workers, and extension-based credential or traffic logic recovery.
  • Acase-reviewReviews a reverse-skill case package for scope readiness, Evidence to Finding to Path traceability, work item coverage, timeline references, and optional artifact hash integrity before report handoff.
  • Acloud-k8sUse for authorized cloud, container, and Kubernetes security assessment including metadata SSRF, IAM misconfig, container escape paths, and cluster RBAC review.
  • Acode-auditUse for authorized source-code security review and SAST workflows including Semgrep, CodeQL patterns, dangerous API hunting, and fix verification.
  • Acompetition-ad-certificate-abuseInternal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AD CS, certificate templates, enrollment rights, EKUs, SAN controls, PKINIT, certificate mapping, and cert-based privilege paths. Use when the user asks about ESC-style abuse, certificate templates, enrollment agents, EKUs, SAN or subject controls, smartcard or PKINIT logon, CA policy, or how an issued cert turns into accepted privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
  • Acompetition-agent-cloudInternal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AI-agent, prompt-injection, MCP or toolchain, cloud, container, CI/CD, and supply-chain challenges. Use when the user asks to analyze prompt-to-tool flows, retrieval poisoning, mounted secrets, deployment drift, runtime-vs-manifest mismatches, registry provenance, or CI-produced artifacts under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

All agent skills → · MCP servers