Mmcp.market

competition-ad-certificate-abuse skill

by zhaoxuya520·zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill·39k stars·MIT

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AD CS, certificate templates, enrollment rights, EKUs, SAN controls, PKINIT, certificate mapping, and cert-based privilege paths. Use when the user asks about ESC-style abuse, certificate templates, enrollment agents, EKUs, SAN or subject controls, smartcard or PKINIT logon, CA policy, or how an issued cert turns into accepted privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

A100/100content scan

Is the competition-ad-certificate-abuse skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 3 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.

No findings.

Install the competition-ad-certificate-abuse skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill.git /tmp/reverse-skill
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/reverse-skill/CTF-Sandbox-Orchestrator/competition-ad-certificate-abuse ~/.claude/skills/competition-ad-certificate-abuse
available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

Competition AD Certificate Abuse

Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.

Use this skill when the decisive identity edge is certificate-based and the hard part is proving how a template or CA policy turns into accepted privilege.

Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.

Quick Start

  1. Identify the CA, template, enrolling principal, and accepting service before diving into every certificate detail.
  2. Separate template enrollability from cert-based authentication or privilege acceptance.
  3. Record EKUs, subject or SAN controls, issuance requirements, enrollment rights, and mapping behavior in compact blocks.
  4. Tie the issued cert to one accepted path: PKINIT, Schannel, LDAPS, WinRM, or another mapped service.
  5. Reproduce the smallest certificate issuance-to-acceptance chain that yields the decisive privilege.

Workflow

1. Map CA And Template Trust

  • Record CA configuration, template name, enrollment permissions, manager approval, authorized signatures, EKUs, subject requirements, and SAN behavior.
  • Note whether the path depends on alternate subject names, UPN, DNS names, enrollment agent behavior, or template supersedence.
  • Keep principal, template, and issuance policy tied together.

2. Prove Cert-To-Privilege Acceptance

  • Show how the issued certificate is mapped or accepted: PKINIT, smartcard logon, Schannel auth, service mapping, or explicit certificate mapping.
  • Record serial, subject, SAN, EKU, validity, and the exact service or domain edge that accepts it.
  • Distinguish certificate issuance from the separate step where privilege is actually granted.

3. Reduce To The Decisive Abuse Chain

  • Compress the path to the smallest sequence: enrollment right or misconfig -> issued cert -> accepted mapping -> resulting privilege.
  • State clearly whether the weakness lives in template config, CA policy, mapping logic, relay path, or enrollment rights.
  • If the task is really about delegation or ticket transformation after PKINIT, switch back to the tighter Kerberos skill.

Read This Reference

  • Load references/ad-certificate-abuse.md for the AD CS checklist, template checklist, and evidence packaging.

What To Preserve

  • CA names, template names, rights, EKUs, issuance flags, SAN controls, and mapping details
  • Issued certificate fields, serials, subjects, SANs, and the accepting service or logon path
  • The smallest reproducible enrollment-to-privilege chain

More skills from zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill

  • Fapi-securityUse for authorized security assessment of REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, or SOAP APIs, including discovery, authentication, authorization, rate-limit, and CI/CD testing.
  • Capk-reverse在 CLI 环境下做 Android APK 逆向时使用。适用于 APK 解包、Java 反编译、smali 修改、重打包、Frida 动态 Hook,以及按需切换到 so/native 分析。优先使用本机已安装的 jadx、apktool、frida、adb、ida-reverse、radare2。
  • Cattack-chainUse for authorized multi-stage attack-path planning and orchestration when a task spans reconnaissance, initial access, privilege escalation, lateral movement, or impact assessment. Route single-stage tasks directly to their specialist skill.
  • Abinary-diff跨版本符号迁移与二进制差分。当你有旧版本的符号/逆向结果,需要快速迁移到新版本时使用。 适用场景:内核缺 PDB 用旧版符号推导、程序更新后批量迁移函数名、应用更新后快速定位新偏移。 核心方法:用 LLM 做结构化差异比对,程序化输入输出,成本极低(200 函数 ~1 元)。 触发关键词:符号迁移、bindiff、跨版本、PDB 缺失、函数偏移迁移、symbol migration、binary diff、版本对比。
  • Abinary-ninja-reverseUse for authorized binary analysis in Binary Ninja, including HLIL/MLIL/LLIL inspection, strings/imports/exports, cross-references, types, patch review, Python API automation, and optional Binary Ninja MCP or localhost HTTP integration.
  • Abrowser-automation统一自动化入口。覆盖浏览器自动化(Playwright)和 Windows 桌面应用自动化(OpenReverse)。 浏览器场景:打开网页、点击、填表、爬取、截图、自动化登录、渗透页面交互。 桌面场景:操作 IDA/x64dbg 等 GUI 工具、Windows UI Automation、视觉驱动交互、桌面应用网络抓包。 触发关键词:浏览器自动化、桌面自动化、打开网页、填表、爬取、截图、自动化登录、Playwright、agent-browser、headless、OpenReverse、UIA、CUA、桌面操作、Windows 自动化。
  • Abrowser-extension-reverseUse for authorized reverse engineering of browser extensions (Chrome/Firefox) including manifest analysis, background workers, and extension-based credential or traffic logic recovery.
  • Acase-reviewReviews a reverse-skill case package for scope readiness, Evidence to Finding to Path traceability, work item coverage, timeline references, and optional artifact hash integrity before report handoff.
  • Acloud-k8sUse for authorized cloud, container, and Kubernetes security assessment including metadata SSRF, IAM misconfig, container escape paths, and cluster RBAC review.
  • Acode-auditUse for authorized source-code security review and SAST workflows including Semgrep, CodeQL patterns, dangerous API hunting, and fix verification.
  • Acompetition-agent-cloudInternal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AI-agent, prompt-injection, MCP or toolchain, cloud, container, CI/CD, and supply-chain challenges. Use when the user asks to analyze prompt-to-tool flows, retrieval poisoning, mounted secrets, deployment drift, runtime-vs-manifest mismatches, registry provenance, or CI-produced artifacts under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
  • Acompetition-android-hookingInternal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Android APK hooking, Frida tracing, request-signing recovery, SSL pinning bypass, JNI boundary inspection, and app trust-boundary analysis. Use when the user asks to hook an APK, inspect signer logic, trace Java or native boundaries, bypass pinning or root checks, inspect shared prefs or app databases, or replay accepted mobile requests. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

All agent skills → · MCP servers