threat-hunting skill
Use for blue-team threat hunting, detection engineering with Sigma/YARA, SIEM query design, and incident detection validation.
A100/100content scan
Is the threat-hunting skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 2 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the threat-hunting skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill.git /tmp/reverse-skill mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/reverse-skill/skills/threat-hunting ~/.claude/skills/threat-hunting
available in every project
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Threat Hunting & Detection Engineering
ACTION REQUIRED(读完后立刻执行)
- NOW: 确认蓝队/狩猎授权与数据源范围(SIEM、EDR 导出)
- NOW: 明确假说(hypothesis)再查数,避免无脑刷告警
- NEXT: 工具与数据接入方式
- ACT: 假说 → 查询 → 验证 → 规则化
适用场景
- 威胁狩猎(hypothesis-driven)
- Sigma / YARA 检测工程
- 告警调优、误报分析
- 与 malware-analysis/:样本侧 IOC → 本 skill 落地检测
- 与 digital-forensics/:案件伪影 → 横向狩猎
工作流
1. 建假说
例:攻击者用 living-off-the-land 做横向
→ 数据源:Sysmon 1/3/10、Windows Security 4624/4648
→ 成功标准:发现异常父进程或罕见账户日志源2. 查询与堆叠
□ 基线:正常管理员行为时段与主机
□ 异常:新服务、编码 PowerShell、异常出站
□ 关联:同账号多主机短时登录3. 规则化
# Sigma 骨架见 malware-analysis;本 skill 强调:
# - 误报面
# - 数据源字段映射
# - 响应 playbook 链接4. 验证
□ 原子测试(Atomic Red Team)仅在授权实验室
□ 回放历史日志验证召回工具链
参考
- references/hunting-loop.md
- ../malware-analysis/references/yara-sigma-rules.md
- ../digital-forensics/
路由上下文
上游: MASTER R27 下游: 确认入侵 → forensics;恶意样本 → malware-analysis MUST NOT: 在无授权生产环境跑攻击模拟
任务完成自检
- [ ] 是否有明确假说与结论?
- [ ] 规则是否注明误报与数据源?
- [ ] Checklist?
More skills from zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill
- Fapi-securityUse for authorized security assessment of REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, or SOAP APIs, including discovery, authentication, authorization, rate-limit, and CI/CD testing.
- Capk-reverse在 CLI 环境下做 Android APK 逆向时使用。适用于 APK 解包、Java 反编译、smali 修改、重打包、Frida 动态 Hook,以及按需切换到 so/native 分析。优先使用本机已安装的 jadx、apktool、frida、adb、ida-reverse、radare2。
- Cattack-chainUse for authorized multi-stage attack-path planning and orchestration when a task spans reconnaissance, initial access, privilege escalation, lateral movement, or impact assessment. Route single-stage tasks directly to their specialist skill.
- Abinary-diff跨版本符号迁移与二进制差分。当你有旧版本的符号/逆向结果,需要快速迁移到新版本时使用。 适用场景:内核缺 PDB 用旧版符号推导、程序更新后批量迁移函数名、应用更新后快速定位新偏移。 核心方法:用 LLM 做结构化差异比对,程序化输入输出,成本极低(200 函数 ~1 元)。 触发关键词:符号迁移、bindiff、跨版本、PDB 缺失、函数偏移迁移、symbol migration、binary diff、版本对比。
- Abinary-ninja-reverseUse for authorized binary analysis in Binary Ninja, including HLIL/MLIL/LLIL inspection, strings/imports/exports, cross-references, types, patch review, Python API automation, and optional Binary Ninja MCP or localhost HTTP integration.
- Abrowser-automation统一自动化入口。覆盖浏览器自动化(Playwright)和 Windows 桌面应用自动化(OpenReverse)。 浏览器场景:打开网页、点击、填表、爬取、截图、自动化登录、渗透页面交互。 桌面场景:操作 IDA/x64dbg 等 GUI 工具、Windows UI Automation、视觉驱动交互、桌面应用网络抓包。 触发关键词:浏览器自动化、桌面自动化、打开网页、填表、爬取、截图、自动化登录、Playwright、agent-browser、headless、OpenReverse、UIA、CUA、桌面操作、Windows 自动化。
- Abrowser-extension-reverseUse for authorized reverse engineering of browser extensions (Chrome/Firefox) including manifest analysis, background workers, and extension-based credential or traffic logic recovery.
- Acase-reviewReviews a reverse-skill case package for scope readiness, Evidence to Finding to Path traceability, work item coverage, timeline references, and optional artifact hash integrity before report handoff.
- Acloud-k8sUse for authorized cloud, container, and Kubernetes security assessment including metadata SSRF, IAM misconfig, container escape paths, and cluster RBAC review.
- Acode-auditUse for authorized source-code security review and SAST workflows including Semgrep, CodeQL patterns, dangerous API hunting, and fix verification.
- Acompetition-ad-certificate-abuseInternal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AD CS, certificate templates, enrollment rights, EKUs, SAN controls, PKINIT, certificate mapping, and cert-based privilege paths. Use when the user asks about ESC-style abuse, certificate templates, enrollment agents, EKUs, SAN or subject controls, smartcard or PKINIT logon, CA policy, or how an issued cert turns into accepted privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
- Acompetition-agent-cloudInternal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AI-agent, prompt-injection, MCP or toolchain, cloud, container, CI/CD, and supply-chain challenges. Use when the user asks to analyze prompt-to-tool flows, retrieval poisoning, mounted secrets, deployment drift, runtime-vs-manifest mismatches, registry provenance, or CI-produced artifacts under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.