lex-diegosouzapw skill
LEX: Legal-Entity-X-ref workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Centralized ''Truth Engine'' for cross-jurisdictional legal context (US, EU, CA) and contract scaffolding and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
Is the lex-diegosouzapw skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the lex-diegosouzapw skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open.git /tmp/legal-skills-open mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/legal-skills-open/cross-jurisdiction/corporate/skills/lex-diegosouzapw ~/.claude/skills/lex-diegosouzapw
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
LEX: Legal-Entity-X-ref
Overview
This public intake copy packages plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/lex from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses the external_source block in metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
LEX: Legal-Entity-X-ref
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: How It Works, Common Pitfalls, Limitations.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
- Use when you need to cross-reference or compare legal requirements between different territories, such as verifying the compliance gap between an EU SARL and a US LLC.
- Use when working with foundational business or employment documents that require specific, jurisdiction-compliant clauses to be inserted into a professional scaffold.
- Use when the user asks about the specific regulatory nuances, formation steps, or "truth-based" definitions of legal entities within the 29 supported jurisdictions (USA, Canada, and the EU).
- Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Centralized 'Truth Engine' for cross-jurisdictional legal context (US, EU, CA) and contract scaffolding.
- Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
- Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
Operating Table
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
- Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
- Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
- Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
- Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
- Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
- Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
- Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Overview
LEX is a structured truth engine designed to eliminate legal hallucinations by grounding agents in verified government references and legislation across 29+ jurisdictions. It provides deterministic context for business formation, employment, and contract drafting.
Imported: How It Works
Step 1: Identify Jurisdiction
Before drafting, determine if the user's entity or contract target is in the USA, Canada, or the EU.
Step 2: Search & Fetch Context
Use the CLI shortcuts to find the relevant legal patterns and templates.
- Run lex search to find matching templates.
- Run lex get to read the granular metadata and requirements.
Step 3: Scaffold Drafting
Generate foundation-level documents using lex draft . This ensures that all drafts include the mandatory AI-generated content disclaimer.
Step 4: Verify Authority
Always include a "Verified Sources" section in your output by running lex verify, which fetches official government links for the retrieved context.
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @lex to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @lex against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @lex for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @lex using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Imported Usage Notes
Imported: Examples
Example 1: Comparing Employment Laws
# Get the workforce template to compare US vs EU notice periods
lex get templates/02_employment_workforce.mdExample 2: Drafting a Czech Contract
# Create a house sale contract scaffold in Czech language
lex draft "Czech house sale contract"Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
- ✅ Trust but Verify: Always include the links provided by lex verify in your output.
- ✅ Table Formatting: Use tables when comparing results across multiple jurisdictions.
- ❌ No Guessing: If a jurisdiction is outside the US/EU/CA scope, state that it is outside the LEX "Truth Engine" coverage.
- ❌ No Anecdotal Advice: Stick strictly to the findings in the templates or verified government domains.
- Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
- Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
- Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
Imported Operating Notes
Imported: Best Practices
- ✅ Trust but Verify: Always include the links provided by lex verify in your output.
- ✅ Table Formatting: Use tables when comparing results across multiple jurisdictions.
- ❌ No Guessing: If a jurisdiction is outside the US/EU/CA scope, state that it is outside the LEX "Truth Engine" coverage.
- ❌ No Anecdotal Advice: Stick strictly to the findings in the templates or verified government domains.
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/lex, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all. Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Check the external_source block first, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task. Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better. Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
More skills from ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open
- A02民事诉讼案件的诉讼文书制备阶段。承接阶段一(战略把脉)的分析成果,将策略方案转化为可直接提交法院的正式法律文书,同时建立对方来文和法院来文的管理机制。当用户已完成阶段一、需要起草起诉状/答辩状、制作证据目录、或收到对方/法院文书需要处理时触发。适用于原告准备起诉材料,或被告准备应诉材料。
- A02-lyronlee二审程序的诉讼文书制备阶段。承接阶段一(战略分析)的分析成果,将上诉策略转化为可直接提交二审法院的正式法律文书。当用户已完成阶段一、需要起草上诉状或二审答辩状、制作新证据目录、或收到法院来文需要处理时触发。适用于上诉人准备上诉材料,或被上诉人准备应诉材料。
- Aad-compliance-review广告合规审核技能,用于审核广告素材是否符合中国广告法及相关法规。适用场景:(1) 用户提交广告文案、广告素材要求合规审核时;(2) 用户提到"广告审核""广告合规""广告法审查"等关键词时;(3) 用户要求检查广告内容是否存在违法违规风险时;(4) 用户提交房地产、食品、医疗、药品、互联网等行业广告要求专项审核时。审核依据涵盖《广告法》《反不正当竞争法》及行业专项法规。
- Aadmin-reviewReviews administrative case documents for procedural compliance across 38 checkpoints, covering filing, summons, handling outcomes, evidence, and rights protection. Use when auditing public security administrative case files in txt format for legal procedure violations.
- Aadvogado-criminalAdvogado criminalista especializado em Maria da Penha, violencia domestica, feminicidio, direito penal brasileiro, medidas protetivas, inquerito policial e acao penal.
- Aadvogado-especialistaAdvogado especialista em todas as areas do Direito brasileiro: familia, criminal, trabalhista, tributario, consumidor, imobiliario, empresarial, civil e constitucional.
- Aage-verification-methodsEvaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.
- Aai-privacy-assessmentGuides the combined DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment for AI systems processing personal data. Covers EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021, training data lawfulness under Art. 6 and Art. 9, Art. 22 automated decision-making, algorithmic bias detection, and NIST AI RMF MAP function. Keywords: AI privacy, DPIA, AI Act, algorithmic bias, automated decision-making, Art. 22, training data, NIST AI RMF.
- Aanalise-processo-penalAssessoria judicial completa para processos penais. Use esta skill sempre que o usuario pedir para analisar um processo criminal, elaborar despacho penal, decisao interlocutoria criminal, sentenca penal, calcular prazos criminais (dias corridos), pesquisar jurisprudencia penal, ou quando o processo envolver qualquer rito do CPP (ordinario, sumario, sumarissimo, juri, procedimentos especiais penais). Tambem use quando o usuario mencionar termos como "criminal", "penal", "CPP", "crime", "denuncia", "inquerito", "prisao", "liberdade provisoria", "habeas corpus", "tribunal do juri", "acao penal", "execucao penal", "LEP", "suspensao condicional", "sursis", "livramento condicional", "medida de seguranca", "transacao penal", "suspensao condicional do processo", "audiencia de custodia", "colaboracao premiada", "acordo de nao persecucao penal", ou qualquer procedimento regulado pelo Codigo de Processo Penal brasileiro.
- Aapac-transfersGuides management of cross-border data transfers under Asia-Pacific regulatory frameworks including APEC CBPR, ASEAN Model Contractual Clauses, Japan APPI supplementary rules, South Korea PIPA provisions, and Thailand/Singapore PDPA mechanisms. Keywords: APEC CBPR, ASEAN MCCs, APPI, PIPA, PDPA, APAC transfers.
- Aapec-cbpr-certGuides APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules system certification process including self-assessment against the APEC Privacy Framework principles, accountability agent selection, intake questionnaire completion, certification decision, annual recertification, and Global CBPR Forum transition. Keywords: APEC, CBPR, cross-border privacy, accountability agent, certification, Global CBPR.
- Aarckit-at-bvergg[COMMUNITY] Generate Austrian public procurement documentation aligned with Bundesvergabegesetz 2018 — Oberschwellen/Unterschwellen determination, ANKÖ publication, BVergGVS secondary rules, and BVwG review pathway