Mmcp.market

forms-1-12-completeness-verification skill

by ThomasMoreAI·ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open·79 stars·Apache-2.0

Use when pre-flighting Ontario expropriation Forms 1-12 under O.Reg. 363/90 before service or filing — verifying statutory authority citations on Form 2, compensation breakdown completeness on Form 6, 30-day notice math on Form 7, dual-signing-officer compliance, or affidavit-of-service adequacy. Catch defects before they trigger procedural challenges.

A100/100content scan

Is the forms-1-12-completeness-verification skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.

No findings.

Install the forms-1-12-completeness-verification skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description. 

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open.git /tmp/legal-skills-open
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/legal-skills-open/ca/real-estate/skills/forms-1-12-completeness-verification ~/.claude/skills/forms-1-12-completeness-verification
available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

Form-Specific Checklists

Detailed verification requirements for commonly-used expropriation forms.

Form 2 (Notice of Application for Approval to Expropriate)

Checklist:

1. Statutory authority citation:

  • [ ] Enabling legislation cited (e.g., "Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, s.11")
  • [ ] Specific section authorizing expropriation identified
  • [ ] Authority name correct ("City of Toronto" not "Toronto" or "City")

2. Legal description accuracy:

  • [ ] Matches registered deed or survey
  • [ ] Includes: Lot, Concession, Plan number, Registry Division
  • [ ] Consistent with attached plan (if plan attached)
  • [ ] No typos in property identifiers (e.g., "Lot 10" not "Lot 1O")

3. Purpose statement clarity:

  • [ ] Public work described in detail ("construction of 4-lane arterial road" not "road project")
  • [ ] Purpose aligns with statutory authority (e.g., Municipal Act allows road construction)
  • [ ] Not vague or overly broad

4. Service requirements:

  • [ ] Served on registered owner(s) - all co-owners if multiple
  • [ ] Service method complies with s.11 Expropriations Act (personal service or registered mail)
  • [ ] Proof of service filed (affidavit or registered mail receipt)
  • [ ] Service date documented (critical for timeline tracking)

5. Dual signing officers (municipal expropriations):

  • [ ] Two officers signed (e.g., Mayor + Clerk, or CAO + Clerk per municipal by-law)
  • [ ] Signatures original (not photocopied or stamped)
  • [ ] Signing officers have authority per municipal by-law
  • [ ] Date of signing recorded

Example defect:

  • Form 2 submitted: Statutory authority cited as "Municipal Act, 2001"
  • Defect: Missing section number (should be "Municipal Act, 2001, s.11")
  • Risk: Approving authority may reject application for insufficient statutory authority citation
  • Correction: Amend Form 2 to add section number, re-serve on owner (resets timeline)

Form 6 (Offer to Purchase / Certificate of Approval on Expropriation Plan)

Checklist:

1. Compensation calculation basis:

  • [ ] Appraisal attached or available (documented market value determination)
  • [ ] Appraisal date within 6 months of offer (recent valuation)
  • [ ] Appraiser credentials documented (AACI designation)

2. Components breakdown:

  • [ ] Market value stated (s.13 Expropriations Act)
  • [ ] Disturbance damages itemized (s.18(1)):
  • [ ] Moving costs
  • [ ] Legal fees
  • [ ] Appraisal fees
  • [ ] Business losses (if applicable)
  • [ ] Severance damages quantified (s.18(2)(b), if partial taking)
  • [ ] Injurious affection identified (s.18(2)(a) or (b), if applicable)
  • [ ] Total compensation calculated correctly (sum of components)

3. Payment timing:

  • [ ] Payment deadline stated ("within 30 days of acceptance")
  • [ ] Payment method described (certified cheque, direct deposit, trust account)
  • [ ] Interest provisions if payment delayed (s.20 Expropriations Act, prime + 2%)

4. Acceptance deadline:

  • [ ] Reasonable period given (30-60 days typical)
  • [ ] Deadline date clearly stated ("Accept by June 15, 2025")
  • [ ] Consequences of non-acceptance explained ("If not accepted, referred to OLT")

Example defect:

  • Form 6 submitted: Total compensation $450,000, no breakdown
  • Defect: No itemization of market value vs. disturbance vs. severance
  • Risk: Owner cannot evaluate offer (what is being compensated?), may challenge as non-compliant with s.14 Expropriations Act
  • Correction: Amend Form 6 with breakdown:
  • Market value: $400,000 (appraisal attached)
  • Disturbance: $25,000 (moving $8K, legal $4K, appraisal $3K, inconvenience $10K)
  • Severance: $25,000 (loss of access, remainder parcel shape irregularity)
  • Total: $450,000

Form 7 (Notice of Expropriation)

Checklist:

1. Minimum 30-day notice period:

  • [ ] Possession date ≥30 days from service date (s.11(1) Expropriations Act)
  • [ ] Calculation accounts for service method (registered mail +5 days delivery)
  • [ ] No weekends/holidays counted as service date (business days)

2. Compensation offered/paid confirmation:

  • [ ] States compensation amount offered ("$450,000 as per Form 6 dated May 1, 2025")
  • [ ] Confirms payment made (if paid before Form 7: "Compensation of $450,000 paid June 1, 2025 by certified cheque #12345")
  • [ ] Or confirms offer stands ("Offer of $450,000 remains open for acceptance")

3. Possession date clarity:

  • [ ] Specific date stated ("July 15, 2025" not "30 days from service")
  • [ ] Possession date aligns with project schedule (authority can actually take possession on that date)
  • [ ] Possession date after plan registration (cannot possess before plan registered)

Example defect:

  • Form 7 submitted: "Possession required on July 1, 2025"
  • Service date: June 25, 2025 (registered mail)
  • Delivery date: June 30, 2025 (confirmed by tracking)
  • Defect: Only 1 day between delivery and possession (s.11 requires 30 days)
  • Risk: Possession void, owner can refuse entry, authority must re-serve with corrected date
  • Correction: Amend possession date to July 30, 2025 (30 days from June 30 delivery), re-serve Form 7

Common Defects Database

Systematic tracking of frequent errors to prevent recurrence.

Missing Statutory Authority Citations

Defect: Form cites "Municipal Act" without specific section or subsection.

Example:

  • Form 1 (Application for Approval): "Authority to expropriate: Municipal Act, 2001"
  • Problem: Municipal Act has multiple sections authorizing expropriation for different purposes (s.8 general welfare, s.9 utilities, s.11 infrastructure)
  • Correction: "Authority to expropriate: Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, s.11 (construction of highways and related works)"

Prevention:

  • Template Forms 1-12 with statutory citations pre-filled
  • Legal review before first use (verify citations current and accurate)
  • Annual review (legislation changes - update citations)

Inconsistent Legal Descriptions

Defect: Legal description in Form 2 differs from legal description in registered plan or Form 7.

Example:

  • Form 2: "Lot 5, Plan 123, City of Toronto"
  • Registered Plan: "Lot 5, Registered Plan 123, Land Registry Office for Toronto (No. 66)"
  • Inconsistency: Missing plan type ("Registered Plan" vs "Plan"), missing LRO number
  • Risk: Registry office rejects plan, challenges to validity of expropriation

Correction:

  • Obtain legal description from registered deed or current survey
  • Use identical wording in all forms
  • Have surveyor verify description before plan preparation

Prevention:

  • Create legal description template from registered deed (copy-paste, don't retype)
  • Cross-check all forms against template before filing

Inadequate Service Proof

Defect: No proof of service filed, or incomplete affidavit.

Example:

  • Form 2 served: Affidavit states "Served on John Smith on May 1, 2025"
  • Problem: No address, no method of service (personal or registered mail?), no time
  • Risk: Owner challenges service as defective, may void expropriation

Complete affidavit should state:

"I, Jane Doe, process server, make oath and say:

More skills from ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

  • A02民事诉讼案件的诉讼文书制备阶段。承接阶段一（战略把脉）的分析成果，将策略方案转化为可直接提交法院的正式法律文书，同时建立对方来文和法院来文的管理机制。当用户已完成阶段一、需要起草起诉状/答辩状、制作证据目录、或收到对方/法院文书需要处理时触发。适用于原告准备起诉材料，或被告准备应诉材料。
  • A02-lyronlee二审程序的诉讼文书制备阶段。承接阶段一（战略分析）的分析成果，将上诉策略转化为可直接提交二审法院的正式法律文书。当用户已完成阶段一、需要起草上诉状或二审答辩状、制作新证据目录、或收到法院来文需要处理时触发。适用于上诉人准备上诉材料，或被上诉人准备应诉材料。
  • Aad-compliance-review广告合规审核技能，用于审核广告素材是否符合中国广告法及相关法规。适用场景：(1) 用户提交广告文案、广告素材要求合规审核时；(2) 用户提到"广告审核""广告合规""广告法审查"等关键词时；(3) 用户要求检查广告内容是否存在违法违规风险时；(4) 用户提交房地产、食品、医疗、药品、互联网等行业广告要求专项审核时。审核依据涵盖《广告法》《反不正当竞争法》及行业专项法规。
  • Aadmin-reviewReviews administrative case documents for procedural compliance across 38 checkpoints, covering filing, summons, handling outcomes, evidence, and rights protection. Use when auditing public security administrative case files in txt format for legal procedure violations.
  • Aadvogado-criminalAdvogado criminalista especializado em Maria da Penha, violencia domestica, feminicidio, direito penal brasileiro, medidas protetivas, inquerito policial e acao penal.
  • Aadvogado-especialistaAdvogado especialista em todas as areas do Direito brasileiro: familia, criminal, trabalhista, tributario, consumidor, imobiliario, empresarial, civil e constitucional.
  • Aage-verification-methodsEvaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.
  • Aai-privacy-assessmentGuides the combined DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment for AI systems processing personal data. Covers EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021, training data lawfulness under Art. 6 and Art. 9, Art. 22 automated decision-making, algorithmic bias detection, and NIST AI RMF MAP function. Keywords: AI privacy, DPIA, AI Act, algorithmic bias, automated decision-making, Art. 22, training data, NIST AI RMF.
  • Aanalise-processo-penalAssessoria judicial completa para processos penais. Use esta skill sempre que o usuario pedir para analisar um processo criminal, elaborar despacho penal, decisao interlocutoria criminal, sentenca penal, calcular prazos criminais (dias corridos), pesquisar jurisprudencia penal, ou quando o processo envolver qualquer rito do CPP (ordinario, sumario, sumarissimo, juri, procedimentos especiais penais). Tambem use quando o usuario mencionar termos como "criminal", "penal", "CPP", "crime", "denuncia", "inquerito", "prisao", "liberdade provisoria", "habeas corpus", "tribunal do juri", "acao penal", "execucao penal", "LEP", "suspensao condicional", "sursis", "livramento condicional", "medida de seguranca", "transacao penal", "suspensao condicional do processo", "audiencia de custodia", "colaboracao premiada", "acordo de nao persecucao penal", ou qualquer procedimento regulado pelo Codigo de Processo Penal brasileiro.
  • Aapac-transfersGuides management of cross-border data transfers under Asia-Pacific regulatory frameworks including APEC CBPR, ASEAN Model Contractual Clauses, Japan APPI supplementary rules, South Korea PIPA provisions, and Thailand/Singapore PDPA mechanisms. Keywords: APEC CBPR, ASEAN MCCs, APPI, PIPA, PDPA, APAC transfers.
  • Aapec-cbpr-certGuides APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules system certification process including self-assessment against the APEC Privacy Framework principles, accountability agent selection, intake questionnaire completion, certification decision, annual recertification, and Global CBPR Forum transition. Keywords: APEC, CBPR, cross-border privacy, accountability agent, certification, Global CBPR.
  • Aarckit-at-bvergg[COMMUNITY] Generate Austrian public procurement documentation aligned with Bundesvergabegesetz 2018 — Oberschwellen/Unterschwellen determination, ANKÖ publication, BVergGVS secondary rules, and BVwG review pathway

All agent skills → · MCP servers