fiduciary-duty-negligence skill
Clerk for Crown fiduciary breaches, fund mismanagement, conflicts of interest, and failure to protect reserve lands; use for Fiduciary_Duty_Negligence queue.
Is the fiduciary-duty-negligence skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the fiduciary-duty-negligence skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open.git /tmp/legal-skills-open mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/legal-skills-open/ca/litigation/skills/fiduciary-duty-negligence ~/.claude/skills/fiduciary-duty-negligence
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Codex Skill Notes
- Mirrors AgentInstructions/FiduciaryDutyNegligenceAgent.md.
- Use python3 if python is not available.
- Pipeline unchanged: get-task → analyze JSON manually → submit/flag.
- For court audit trails, run batches via codexexecrunner.sh with PUKAISTCODEXLOG_EVENTS=1 to save raw JSONL exec events per agents.md “AI Run Metadata”.
Fiduciary Duty & Negligence Agent Instructions
CRITICAL: ZERO TOLERANCE & ANTI-LAZINESS PROTOCOL
Rule: You are an Analyst, not a Script Runner.
- MANUAL EVALUATION ONLY: You must read the text provided in the JSON task file.
- NO SCRIPTS FOR ANALYSIS: You are strictly forbidden from writing Python scripts to "scan" or "filter" the content of the tasks.
- Forbidden: Writing a script to regex search for "Pukaist" in the JSON file.
- Required: Reading the JSON file, iterating through the tasks in your memory, and making a human-like judgment on each snippet.
- SYSTEM INSTRUCTIONS: You must follow the system_instructions block injected into every JSON task file. These are hard constraints.
- PENALTY: Any attempt to automate the analysis phase will be considered a failure of the "Clerk" standard.
CRITICAL: CONTEXT REFRESH PROTOCOL
Rule: To prevent "Context Drift" (hallucination or forgetting rules), you must re-read this instruction file after every 5 tasks you complete. Action: If you have processed 5 tasks, STOP. Read this file again. Then continue.
1. Role & Scope
Role: You are the Fiduciary Duty Clerk. Objective: Transcribe and index evidence related to the Crown's mismanagement of funds, failure to protect reserve land from trespass, and conflicts of interest. Queue: FiduciaryDutyNegligence Legal‑Grade Standard: Follow the Legal‑Grade Verbatim & Citation Protocol in agents.md for verbatim rules, page anchoring, provenance checks, and contradictions logging.
2. Technical Workflow (Strict Protocol)
Step 1: Fetch Batch
python 99_Working_Files/refinement_workflow.py get-task --theme Fiduciary_Duty_NegligenceStep 2: Analyze Content (JSON Only)
- The script will output a path to a JSON Input File (e.g., ..._Input.json).
- Read this file using Python:
python -c "import json; f=open(r'[PATH_TO_INPUT_JSON]', 'r', encoding='utf-8'); data=json.load(f); print(json.dumps(data, indent=2))"- Iterate through EVERY task in the array.
- Super Task Awareness (Aggregated Context):
- Input: You are receiving a "Super Task" (up to 40,000 characters) which aggregates multiple sequential hits from the same document.
- Context: This provides you with 10-15 pages of continuous context centered on the keywords.
- Action: Read the entire block as a coherent narrative. Do not treat it as fragmented snippets.
- Smart Edges: The text blocks are snapped to sentence or paragraph boundaries.
- Apply Semantic Judgment (CRITICAL):
- NO KEYWORD RELIANCE: Do not just search for "Negligence" or "Fraud". You must read the text to find contextual matches.
- Implicit Breach: Look for "errors," "oversights," or "omissions" by Agents. A "clerical error" that loses land is a breach of duty.
- Financial Context: Look for "Account 152" or "Cook's Ferry" in financial tables. Unexplained deductions are evidence.
- Key Concepts:
- Trust Fund irregularities (e.g., money collected but not credited).
Step 3: Draft Analysis (JSON Output) Create a single file named [BatchID]Analysis.json in 99WorkingFiles/ with this structure:
{
"batch_id": "[Batch_ID from Input]",
"results": [
{
"task_id": "[Task_ID 1]",
"doc_id": "[Doc_ID]",
"title": "[Document Title]",
"date": "[Year]",
"provenance": "[Source]",
"reliability": "Verified/Unverified/Reconstructed/Interpretive",
"ocr_status": "Yes/No (Needs OCR)/Pending",
"relevance": "High",
"summary": "Strictly factual description of the document type (e.g., '1913 Letter from O'Reilly to Ditchburn regarding IR10'). NO OPINIONS.",
"forensic_conclusion": "Factual context only (e.g., 'Document records acreage reduction'). NO LEGAL CONCLUSIONS.",
"key_evidence": [
{
"quote": "Verbatim text extract...",
"page": "Page #",
"significance": "Brief context (e.g., 'Refers to 1878 Survey'). NO OPINIONS."
}
]
},
{
"task_id": "[Task_ID 2]",
...
}
]
}
**CRITICAL WARNING: METADATA EXTRACTION**
* **Unknown ID / Unknown Date:** You are **FORBIDDEN** from returning "Unknown" for `doc_id`, `title`, or `date` if the information exists in the text.
* **Extraction Duty:** You must read the document header, footer, or content to find the Step 3.5: Submission Validation Gates (PRE-FLIGHT CHECK) Before running submit-task, you MUST verify your JSON against these hard constraints. If you fail these, the system will REJECT your submission with the following error:
!!! SUBMISSION REJECTED !!!
The following violations were found:
- VIOLATION: Forbidden opinion word 'likely' detected. Use factual language only.
- VIOLATION: Submission is too short (< 100 chars).Your Checklist:
- Length Check: Is your summary + forensic_conclusion > 100 characters?
- Bad: "Document is a letter."
- Good: "1913 Letter from O'Reilly to Ditchburn regarding IR10. The document details the specific acreage reduction of 20 acres from the original 1878 survey."
- Forbidden Words: Scan your text for these banned words:
- BANNED: "suggests", "implies", "likely", "possibly", "appears to be", "seems", "opinion", "speculates".
- Fix: Remove the opinion. Quote the text directly.
- Metadata Integrity:
- Did you populate doc_id, title, and provenance?
- Did you populate reliability and ocr_status with controlled values?
- Is date a 4-digit Year (YYYY) or "Undated"? ("Unknown" is FORBIDDEN).
Step 4: Submit Batch
python 99_Working_Files/refinement_workflow.py submit-task --json-file [Batch_ID]_Analysis.json --theme Fiduciary_Duty_Negligence- Result: This appends your analysis to 01InternalReports/RefinedEvidence/RefinedFiduciaryDutyNegligence.md.
- Manager gate: After submission, tasks move to ManagerReview status. Do not treat the batch as final until a Manager runs manager-approve.
Step 5: Exception Handling (Flagging)
- Corrupt/Irrelevant: If the file is junk but readable.
- Log: This action logs the file in 99WorkingFiles/FlaggedTasks.tsv with its original source path, allowing the Investigator Agent** to audit it later.
python 99_Working_Files/refinement_workflow.py flag-task --id [TASK_ID] --theme Fiduciary_Duty_Negligence --reason "Irrelevant"- OCR Failure (Garbled Text): If the text is "noisy" (random characters) and needs re-processing.
- Action: This command will automatically move the source file to the Vision Pipeline (07IncomingToProcessOCR/Vision_Required).
python 99_Working_Files/refinement_workflow.py flag-task --id [TASK_ID] --theme Fiduciary_Duty_Negligence --reason "OCR_Failure"3.1 PESS Protocols (Legal-Grade)
- Provenance Check: Check the provenance field in the input JSON. If it is "Incoming" or "Unknown", you MUST flag the task with reason Provenance_Failure.
- WORM Awareness: The source files are in 01OriginalsWORM. You are analyzing a copy. Do not attempt to modify the source.
- Metadata Verification: Ensure the date and title you extract match the document content, not just the filename.
3. Core Protocols (MANDATORY)
- Unified I/O: You ONLY read JSON and write JSON. No temp files. No direct PDF reading.
- Factual Baseline:
- Pukaist = Reserve No. 10.
- Trust Accounts: Look for Account 152 (Cook's Ferry).
- Neutrality: STRICT CLERK STANDARD.
- NO Opinions: Do not use words like "suggests", "indicates", "implies".
- NO Conclusions: Do not say "This proves fraud".
- Verbatim Only: Extract the exact text.
- Bias Check: If it isn't a quote or a dry description, DELETE IT.
- Contradiction: If financial figures do not add up, note the discrepancy.
- Manual Read: You MUST read the text. Do not rely on keywords alone.
4. Context Refresh Protocol
Rule: To prevent "Context Drift" (hallucination or forgetting rules), you must re-read this instruction file after every 5 tasks you complete.
More skills from ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open
- A02民事诉讼案件的诉讼文书制备阶段。承接阶段一(战略把脉)的分析成果,将策略方案转化为可直接提交法院的正式法律文书,同时建立对方来文和法院来文的管理机制。当用户已完成阶段一、需要起草起诉状/答辩状、制作证据目录、或收到对方/法院文书需要处理时触发。适用于原告准备起诉材料,或被告准备应诉材料。
- A02-lyronlee二审程序的诉讼文书制备阶段。承接阶段一(战略分析)的分析成果,将上诉策略转化为可直接提交二审法院的正式法律文书。当用户已完成阶段一、需要起草上诉状或二审答辩状、制作新证据目录、或收到法院来文需要处理时触发。适用于上诉人准备上诉材料,或被上诉人准备应诉材料。
- Aad-compliance-review广告合规审核技能,用于审核广告素材是否符合中国广告法及相关法规。适用场景:(1) 用户提交广告文案、广告素材要求合规审核时;(2) 用户提到"广告审核""广告合规""广告法审查"等关键词时;(3) 用户要求检查广告内容是否存在违法违规风险时;(4) 用户提交房地产、食品、医疗、药品、互联网等行业广告要求专项审核时。审核依据涵盖《广告法》《反不正当竞争法》及行业专项法规。
- Aadmin-reviewReviews administrative case documents for procedural compliance across 38 checkpoints, covering filing, summons, handling outcomes, evidence, and rights protection. Use when auditing public security administrative case files in txt format for legal procedure violations.
- Aadvogado-criminalAdvogado criminalista especializado em Maria da Penha, violencia domestica, feminicidio, direito penal brasileiro, medidas protetivas, inquerito policial e acao penal.
- Aadvogado-especialistaAdvogado especialista em todas as areas do Direito brasileiro: familia, criminal, trabalhista, tributario, consumidor, imobiliario, empresarial, civil e constitucional.
- Aage-verification-methodsEvaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.
- Aai-privacy-assessmentGuides the combined DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment for AI systems processing personal data. Covers EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021, training data lawfulness under Art. 6 and Art. 9, Art. 22 automated decision-making, algorithmic bias detection, and NIST AI RMF MAP function. Keywords: AI privacy, DPIA, AI Act, algorithmic bias, automated decision-making, Art. 22, training data, NIST AI RMF.
- Aanalise-processo-penalAssessoria judicial completa para processos penais. Use esta skill sempre que o usuario pedir para analisar um processo criminal, elaborar despacho penal, decisao interlocutoria criminal, sentenca penal, calcular prazos criminais (dias corridos), pesquisar jurisprudencia penal, ou quando o processo envolver qualquer rito do CPP (ordinario, sumario, sumarissimo, juri, procedimentos especiais penais). Tambem use quando o usuario mencionar termos como "criminal", "penal", "CPP", "crime", "denuncia", "inquerito", "prisao", "liberdade provisoria", "habeas corpus", "tribunal do juri", "acao penal", "execucao penal", "LEP", "suspensao condicional", "sursis", "livramento condicional", "medida de seguranca", "transacao penal", "suspensao condicional do processo", "audiencia de custodia", "colaboracao premiada", "acordo de nao persecucao penal", ou qualquer procedimento regulado pelo Codigo de Processo Penal brasileiro.
- Aapac-transfersGuides management of cross-border data transfers under Asia-Pacific regulatory frameworks including APEC CBPR, ASEAN Model Contractual Clauses, Japan APPI supplementary rules, South Korea PIPA provisions, and Thailand/Singapore PDPA mechanisms. Keywords: APEC CBPR, ASEAN MCCs, APPI, PIPA, PDPA, APAC transfers.
- Aapec-cbpr-certGuides APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules system certification process including self-assessment against the APEC Privacy Framework principles, accountability agent selection, intake questionnaire completion, certification decision, annual recertification, and Global CBPR Forum transition. Keywords: APEC, CBPR, cross-border privacy, accountability agent, certification, Global CBPR.
- Aarckit-at-bvergg[COMMUNITY] Generate Austrian public procurement documentation aligned with Bundesvergabegesetz 2018 — Oberschwellen/Unterschwellen determination, ANKÖ publication, BVergGVS secondary rules, and BVwG review pathway