finishing-a-development-branch skill
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
Is the finishing-a-development-branch skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-10-25.
No findings.
Install the finishing-a-development-branch skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/obra/superpowers.git /tmp/superpowers mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/superpowers/skills/finishing-a-development-branch ~/.claude/skills/finishing-a-development-branch
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Finishing a Development Branch
Overview
Core principle: Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
Step 1: Verify Tests
Run the project's full test suite (npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...).
If tests fail, report the failures and stop — the menu comes after a green suite:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]If tests pass: continue to Step 2.
Step 2: Detect Environment
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
# Capture now, while still inside the workspace — Step 5 changes directory
# before cleanup (Step 6) needs this value
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:
Step 3: Determine Base Branch
The base branch is whatever this work forked from — usually named in the plan, the conversation, or the branch's upstream. If it is not already known, ask: "This branch split from - is that correct?" Confirm before merging: merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.
Step 4: Present Options
Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 3 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
Which option?Detached HEAD — present exactly these 2 options:
Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace).
1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request
2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later)
Which option?Present the menu exactly as written — concise, with every option coming from the list above. Discarding the work happens only in response to your human partner explicitly asking for it (see "If your human partner asks to discard the work" below). Wait for their answer; the integration decision is theirs.
Step 5: Execute Choice
Option 1: Merge Locally
# Get main repo root for CWD safety
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
# Merge first — verify success before removing anything
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>
# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>If tests fail on the merged result: stop, leave the worktree and branch in place, and investigate — nothing has been pushed, so the merge is local and recoverable.
Once the merged result is green: clean up the worktree (Step 6), then delete the branch:
git branch -d <feature-branch>Option 2: Push and Create PR
git push -u origin <feature-branch>
# From a detached HEAD, name the new branch on the remote:
# git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/<new-branch>Then create the pull/merge request against with the forge's tooling — its CLI if one is available, or the creation URL most forges print when you push — following the repo's PR template and conventions if present, and report the URL to your human partner.
Keep the worktree — your human partner iterates on PR feedback there.
Option 3: Keep As-Is
Report: "Keeping branch . Worktree preserved at ."
If your human partner asks to discard the work
This path exists only as a response to an explicit request to throw the work away. Confirm first:
This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>
Type 'discard' to confirm.Wait for that exact confirmation. When it arrives:
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"Then clean up the worktree (Step 6) and force-delete the branch:
git branch -D <feature-branch>Step 6: Cleanup Workspace
Runs for Option 1 and confirmed discards. Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree. Both callers have already changed directory to the main repo root — worktree removal must run from outside the worktree — and use the GITDIR/GITCOMMON/WORKTREE_PATH values captured in Step 2, from before that directory change.
If GITDIR == GITCOMMON: Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.
If WORKTREEPATH is under .worktrees/ or worktrees/:** Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup:
git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH"
git worktree prune # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrationsIf removal is refused (contains modified or untracked files): the worktree holds files that exist nowhere else — uncommitted plans, notes, or scratch work. Never --force on your own initiative. Show your human partner what is at stake and ask:
git -C "$WORKTREE_PATH" status --porcelain -uallWorktree removal refused — these files were never committed:
<file list>
1. Commit them to <branch> before cleanup
2. Move them into <main repo root>
3. Delete them (unrecoverable)
Which?Carry out the choice, then remove the worktree.
Otherwise: The host environment owns this workspace — leave it in place. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it.
Quick Reference
Common Rationalizations
More skills from obra/superpowers
- AbrainstormingYou MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or planning anything new, in software or out of it (a talk, a business, a renovation).
- Adiagnosing-superpowersUse when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
- Adispatching-parallel-agentsUse when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
- Aexecuting-plansUse when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available
- Areceiving-code-reviewUse when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
- Arequesting-code-reviewUse when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
- Asubagent-driven-developmentUse when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
- Asystematic-debuggingUse when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
- Atest-driven-developmentUse when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
- Ausing-git-worktreesUse when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback
- Ausing-superpowersUse when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
- Averification-before-completionUse when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always