MCP.Market

VoxelSieve MCP server

by yoshi5534·io.github.yoshi5534/voxelsieve·v0.5.0·1 stars

Analyse industrial CT scans locally: porosity, CAD comparison and inspection reports

A88/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A88/100

full report

Adoption
New

1 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed VoxelSieve yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

VoxelSieve tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-28 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanpackage could not be scannedn/a
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 2 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 88/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How VoxelSieve compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
88/100
higher than 75% of 48,255 servers
GitHub stars
1
more than 65% of 28,688 servers

Install VoxelSieve in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.

What the publisher says

From the VoxelSieve repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

VoxelSieve

Open-source tooling for industrial CT volumes, built on OpenVDB.

Reconstructed CT volumes are large, uncompressed raw files in which most voxels are air. VoxelSieve separates the surrounding air from the part, keeps internal voids such as pores, and stores the result as a sparse, bricked VDB dataset that works for scans larger than memory. On top of it, it finds pores and loosened microstructure and writes an inspection report.

All images of the porosity analysis come from one synthetic scan of the sample bell housing, 765 × 765 × 380 voxels of 0.1 mm (445 MB), with the shrinkage cavities and loosened zones where a casting solidifies last: vs-synth --part bellhousing --voxel-size 0.1 --hot-spots --lunker 12 --lunker-radius 0.9 --lunker-spread 0.6 --loosening 3 --loosening-radius 1.5 --noise 500 --cupping 0.08 --blur 0.07 --seed 12. Every lunker volume is found within 2 % of the ground truth (the smallest, 0.06 mm³, within 4 %), the zones deep in the flanges within 2 % and those just below the surface within 10 %, and the part volume within 0.02 %.

Status: early development, latest release 0.3.1 (see CHANGELOG.md). New here? The quickstart takes you from download to a porosity report with an AI assistant, using sample data. The tools:

Build

Dependencies come from vcpkg, pinned in vcpkg.json. On Ubuntu 24.04:

sudo apt-get install cmake ninja-build g++ git curl zip unzip tar autoconf automake libtool pkg-config
tools/setup-vcpkg.sh && export VCPKG_ROOT=~/vcpkg
cmake --preset release && cmake --build --preset release && ctest --preset release
./build/release/apps/vs-phantom/vs-phantom --out phantom --dims 256

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

VoxelSieve: common questions

Is VoxelSieve MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the VoxelSieve safety report
Does VoxelSieve need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is VoxelSieve maintained?
The last commit was 10 days ago (2026-10-25). The latest release is v0.5.0.
How does VoxelSieve compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 88/100 (higher than 75% of 48,255 servers); github stars 1 (more than 65% of 28,688 servers). Full comparison.