MCP.Market

Screen Control MCP server

by Xeakaes·io.github.Xeakaes/computer-use-for-all-agents·v1.0.0·2 stars

Safety-gated computer use for AI agents: screen OCR and vision, mouse, keyboard, window control.

B70/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B70/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

2 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Screen Control yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Screen Control tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityno auth information5/15
  • Maintenancelast push 15 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 70/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Screen Control compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
70/100
higher than 35% of 48,255 servers
GitHub stars
2
more than 75% of 28,688 servers

Install Screen Control in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.

What the publisher says

From the Screen Control repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

🖥️ Screen Control

A local remote-control system for AI agents: watch your computer's screen

live and send mouse/keyboard commands to it. Everything runs on your

own machine — no data ever leaves it, no cloud middleman.

Every keystroke and every screenshot in this GIF went through the API — the agent never touched a physical keyboard.

Why Screen Control?

AI agents today can write code and call APIs — but they can't see or touch your desktop. Screen Control gives any agent general-purpose computer use over a clean, safety-gated HTTP/MCP interface:

vision-capable models, and a text-only diff endpoint for models that can't consume images at all.

  • Perceive — OCR for text, single frames or a live MJPEG stream for

management, background (focus-free) control, virtual desktops.

  • Act — absolute and relative mouse, Unicode-safe keyboard, window

stuck-input watchdog and an emergency failsafe are all enforced server-side, no matter how confused the agent gets.

  • Stay safe — token auth, blocked deadly shortcuts, focus guard, a

One process, zero configuration, works with any language that can speak HTTP — or natively through MCP in Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code and cloud agents.

Performance Is Agent-Bound

Screen Control is the perception and actuation layer — the eyes and hands. The effective speed and capability of any agent using it are bounded by that agent itself and by the environment it runs in:

act → verify loop lives in the agent, so model inference latency and reasoning depth directly set the pace. The API itself adds only milliseconds per call.

  • Thinking speed — one action per agent "turn": the perceive → plan →

the agent's context window; a larger window means more situational awareness before verification degrades.

  • Context capacity — screen readings (OCR text, frames, diffs) consume

tool-call limits and hosting constraints all stack on top of the loop.

  • Runtime environment — network latency, MCP/HTTP round-trip overhead,

In practice this means: the same repo makes a fast reasoning model fast and capable, and makes a slow model slow — the toolchain is not the bottleneck. Real-time or action-heavy tasks need an agent with fast inference and tight tool-loop latency; slower agents should prefer deliberate, verification-heavy tasks.

Table of Contents

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Screen Control: common questions

Is Screen Control MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (70/100). Read the Screen Control safety report
Does Screen Control need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Screen Control maintained?
The last commit was 47 days ago (2026-09-17). The latest release is v1.0.0.
What can I use instead of Screen Control?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: SSH — policy-gated remote access MCP server and Mobilerun MCP server.
How does Screen Control compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 70/100 (higher than 35% of 48,255 servers); github stars 2 (more than 75% of 28,688 servers). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Screen Control

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • SSH — policy-gated remote access
    Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.
    B
  • Mobilerun
    Let AI agents control Android and iOS devices on Mobilerun Cloud: screen, input, apps, workflows.
    A