MCP.Market

MCP Gateway Scan MCP server

by willianpinho·io.github.willianpinho/mcp-gateway-scan·v0.1.1·2 stars

Read-only MCP/agent-gateway readiness scanner — scores a repo across 7 security dimensions.

B80/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B80/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

2 stars34 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed MCP Gateway Scan yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

MCP Gateway Scan tools (1)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • scan_gateway

    Read-only static scan of a repo/directory across 7 gateway-readiness

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium
  • Code scan16 source files scanned20/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 74 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

Findings (1)

  • mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval
    dist/dimensions/d7-prodready.js: …d[_-]?team|jailbreak|injection[_-]?test|eval(?:uation)?[_-]?(?:gate|suite)|refusal[_-…
Overall 80/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How MCP Gateway Scan compares

Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
80/100
higher than 60% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
Tools
1
the typical AI and agents server has 6
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
GitHub stars
2
more than 65% of 2,711 AI and agents servers
Downloads a week
34
more than 23% of 1,538 AI and agents servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 1 read

Install MCP Gateway Scan in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

Runs npx -y mcp-gateway-scan on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add mcp-gateway-scan -- npx -y mcp-gateway-scan
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the MCP Gateway Scan repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

mcp-gateway-scan

Read-only static scanner for MCP / agent-gateway production-readiness anti-patterns.

Point it at a repo, get a 7-dimension red/yellow/green score in seconds.

Built by the team behind the Provenwright MCP Gateway Readiness Audit — a full cited audit with evidence index, scored gap matrix, and 90-day roadmap. Full audit: provenwright.com/audit

npx mcp-gateway-scan ./path/to/your/gateway

It scans your code and config for the failure modes that turn an MCP gateway from a demo into an incident — authorization decided by the model, error handlers that fail open, unpinned supply chains, dark traces, unbounded spend, inline secrets, and missing operational levers — and prints exactly where each one lives.

100% read-only. It only reads files. It never executes your code, never makes network calls, and never prints a secret value — for inline-secret hits it reports the location only (), with the value redacted.

Install

# one-off
npx mcp-gateway-scan <path>

# or global
pnpm add -g mcp-gateway-scan
mcp-gateway-scan <path>

Requires Node ≥ 18.

Usage

mcp-gateway-scan <path> [options]

Options:
  --json          Machine-readable JSON instead of the terminal report
  --ci            Compact, no-color output for pipelines; exits 1 on any RED
  --no-color      Disable ANSI colors
  -h, --help      Show help
  -v, --version   Print version

Exit codes:
  0  no red dimensions
  1  one or more red dimensions
  2  usage / IO error

"Should I connect to this server?" — the connect verdict

Before you wire a third-party MCP server into an agent that holds real credentials, point connect at it and get a single top-line verdict — CONNECT, REVIEW, or DO-NOT-CONNECT — over the same 7 dimensions, with the single worst finding surfaced first.

# the server's repo checkout
mcp-gateway-scan connect ./some-mcp-server

# its MCP client config entry (.mcp.json / claude_desktop_config.json)
mcp-gateway-scan connect ./.mcp.json

# its package manifest
mcp-gateway-scan connect ./package.json

The verdict reduces the dimension scores into one decision:

Same scan engine, same --json / --ci flags, same read-only / secret-redaction guarantees — connect only re-frames the output as a connect/no-connect decision. A green CONNECT is a good signal, not a guarantee: a static scan cannot vouch for the publisher or runtime behavior.

Run it inside Claude Code / Cursor (MCP server)

The same package can also run as an MCP server so your agent runs the scan conversationally — just ask it to "scan this repo for gateway-readiness".

Claude Code (one command):

claude mcp add gateway-scan -- npx -y mcp-gateway-scan mcp

Cursor / any MCP client — add to your .mcp.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gateway-scan": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "mcp-gateway-scan", "mcp"]
    }
  }
}

Then ask your agent to run the scangateway** tool:

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

MCP Gateway Scan: common questions

Is MCP Gateway Scan MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (80/100). Read the MCP Gateway Scan safety report
How do I install MCP Gateway Scan?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does MCP Gateway Scan need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is MCP Gateway Scan maintained?
The last commit was 112 days ago (2026-07-15). The latest release is v0.1.1.
What can I use instead of MCP Gateway Scan?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Agent Security Scanner MCP server, Skillsmith MCP server and LLM Sandbox MCP server.
How does MCP Gateway Scan compare with other AI and agents MCP servers?
safety score 80/100 (higher than 60% of 4,460 AI and agents servers); tools 1 (the typical AI and agents server has 6); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

Alternatives to MCP Gateway Scan

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Agent Security Scanner
    Security layer for AI agents: blocks prompt injection, detects fake packages, scans vulnerabilities.
    C
  • Skillsmith
    Share agent skills across your team, scan them for risk, and track what's actually used.
    B
  • LLM Sandbox
    Securely run LLM-generated code in isolated containers across 7 languages and 3 container backends.
    A
  • HOL Guard
    Local-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.
    A
  • freellmpool
    OpenAI-compatible MCP gateway cataloging 22 LLM providers, with routing, failover, and tools.
    A