MCP.Market

VMware Harden MCP server

by vmware-skills·io.github.vmware-skills/vmware-harden·v1.18.0·4 stars

VMware compliance scanning (CIS, vSphere SCG, GB/T 22239, PCI-DSS) with drift detection.

A91/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A91/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
Growing

4 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed VMware Harden yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

VMware Harden tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How VMware Harden compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
91/100
higher than 85% of 48,255 servers
GitHub stars
4
more than 82% of 28,688 servers

Release history: 9 versions in the registry since 2026-09-16, latest 2026-10-31, typically one every 4 days.

Install VMware Harden in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add vmware-harden -- uvx vmware-harden
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the VMware Harden repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.vmware-skills/vmware-harden -->

vmware-harden

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.vmware-skills/vmware-harden -->

Disclaimer: Community-maintained open-source project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by VMware, Inc. or Broadcom Inc. "VMware", "vSphere", "ESXi", and "NSX" are trademarks of Broadcom. Source code is publicly auditable at github.com/vmware-skills/VMware-Harden under the MIT license.

English | 中文

AI-native VMware compliance and baseline enforcement. Sibling to the vmware-* skill family.

  • Read-only against vSphere: all 8 MCP tools carry the [READ] marker and none mutate managed VMware infrastructure; scan_target writes only to the local twin DB (a cache of its own observations). See Read-only by design.

GA family member (since v1.5.18)

Production-ready compliance platform with 9 built-in baselines (CIS ESXi 8.0 + 9.0, vSphere SCG v8 + v9, vSphere 9 STIG-aligned, 等保 2.0 三级, PCI-DSS 4.0, EU NIS2, BSI IT-Grundschutz) carrying 99 rules, multi-vCenter Twin, drift detection, LLM Remediation Advisor, MCP server with 8 audited tools, web dashboard, and vmware-harden doctor environment diagnostics.

Quickstart

# The collectors extra is what makes `scan` work: harden reads inventory
# through vmware-aiops / vmware-storage / vmware-nsx-security, and `uv tool
# install` gives each tool its own environment — installing them separately
# puts them where harden cannot import them from.
uv tool install "vmware-harden[collectors]"

# Reporting on an existing twin DB needs no collectors:
#   uv tool install vmware-harden

# List built-in baselines
vmware-harden baseline list

# Run a scan
vmware-harden scan --target <vcenter-name> --baseline cis-vmware-esxi-8.0-subset

# Or use 等保 2.0 三级 (国内合规独家)
vmware-harden scan --target <vc> --baseline dengbao-2.0-level3-vmware

# View results
vmware-harden report
vmware-harden drift

# Generate remediation suggestions
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=...  # optional; falls back to mock without
vmware-harden advise --all-critical

# Web dashboard
vmware-harden web --port 8080  # → http://127.0.0.1:8080

Reading a result: violations alone are not a verdict

A rule can only judge configuration that was actually gathered, and that fails in two independent ways. A rule whose attribute no collector produces is not executed at all. A rule that does run can still learn nothing about one particular host, because there the value came back absent or as the N/A sentinel — an unreachable host, an account without the privilege, a setting the ESXi build does not have. Neither is reported as passing:

$ vmware-harden report
No violations among the checks that could be made.

16 of 20 rules could not be evaluated — no collector provides the data they
check, so their result is unknown, not compliant. 6 of 8 per-node checks could
not be made across 2 node(s): the rules ran, but the values they read were
missing on those nodes, so those nodes are unknown rather than compliant.
Not evaluated:
  cis-esxi-2.1.1   no collector writes host.ntp_enabled
  ...
Not judged on these nodes (data missing):
  cis-esxi-2.2.1   esx-02    esxi_build
  ...

--format json returns {"violations": [...], "coverage": {...}}, and the MCP tools return the same coverage block, so an agent reading violations: 0 cannot conclude "compliant" on its own. Before v1.9.0 the uncollected-attribute rules matched zero rows and were silently counted as passes; before v1.10.0 the per-node case was, too. See RELEASE_NOTES.md.

The two lists call for different work: the first is waiting on a collector, the second on that node's reachability and the scanning account's privileges.

Offline / Air-Gapped Install (from source)

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

VMware Harden: common questions

Is VMware Harden MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (91/100). Read the VMware Harden safety report
How do I install VMware Harden?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does VMware Harden need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is VMware Harden maintained?
The last commit was 33 days ago (2026-10-02). The latest release is v1.18.0.
How does VMware Harden compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 91/100 (higher than 85% of 48,255 servers); github stars 4 (more than 82% of 28,688 servers). Full comparison.

More from vmware-skills →