Scout Security MCP server
io.github.Varpost/scout·v0.1.7Deterministic, zero-token security scanner your AI agent calls to find and re-verify issues.
0 stars17 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Scout Security yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Scout Security tools (1)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsRead from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.
scan_pathScan a file or directory for security vulnerabilities.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-25 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan20 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 11 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (2)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truescout_security-0.1.7/scout/scanners/injection.py: ….Pattern[str], str]] = [ ( "shell=True with dynamic command", # The co…
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalscout_security-0.1.7/scout/scanners/injection.py: … vulnerability.", ), ( "eval() usage", # scout: ignore # (?<…
How Scout Security compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 45% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools
- 1
- the typical AI and agents server has 6
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Downloads a week
- 17
- more than 4% of 1,538 AI and agents servers with a package
What its tools let an agent do: 1 read
Install Scout Security in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add scout -- uvx scout-security
What the publisher says
From the Scout Security repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.Varpost/scout -->
Scout
AI security team in a CLI. Find vulnerabilities before hackers do — free, local, no signup.
Why Scout?
AI coding assistants write insecure code constantly — hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, missing auth. Solo developers ship it because they don't have a security team.
Scout is that team. Static analysis catches the most common mistakes AI assistants make — leaked keys, string-built SQL, shell=True, missing security headers. No API keys, no config, no cost.
Install
Zero-install — try it in one command with uv (no venv, ~1s cold start):
uvx scout-security scan ./my-projectOr install it permanently:
pip install scout-securityUsing NCC ScoutSuite too? It also installs a scout command, and whichever package you installed last owns the name. Scout additionally installs scoutsec — same tool, collision-proof name: scoutsec scan ./my-project.
Usage
# Scan a project — deterministic static analysis: no API keys, no tokens, no signup
scout scan ./my-project
# Turn the findings into ready-to-paste fix prompts for your AI assistant
scout scan ./my-project --format ai-promptOutput Formats
One scan, four views — choose with --format (-f):
# Layer 1 — human-readable Markdown report (default)
scout scan ./my-app
scout scan ./my-app -o security-report.md
# Layer 2 — ready-to-paste prompts for your own AI (Cursor, Claude, Copilot…)
scout scan ./my-app --format ai-prompt # writes security-prompts.md
scout scan ./my-app --format ai-prompt -o prompts.md
# Layer 3 — machine-readable JSON for piping into agentic tooling / CI
scout scan ./my-app --format json # prints JSON to stdout
scout scan ./my-app --format json -o report.json
scout scan ./my-app --format json | jq '.findings[]'
# Layer 4 — SARIF 2.1.0 for GitHub Code Scanning (PR annotations)
scout scan ./my-app --format sarif -o scout.sarifThe same engine powers all of them — Scout finds the problem; your own AI (which already knows your codebase) applies the fix.
Use as a CI Gate
scout scan exits 1 when findings at or above --fail-on (default: high) exist, so your pipeline fails on real problems:
scout scan . --fail-on high # default — fail on HIGH or CRITICAL findings
scout scan . --fail-on critical # fail only on CRITICAL
scout scan . --fail-on never # report-only mode — always exit 0The GitHub Action wraps install + scan + SARIF upload, so findings show up as PR annotations via GitHub Code Scanning:
jobs:
scout:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
security-events: write
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: Varpost/Scout@v0.1.16
with:
fail-on: high # also: path, format, upload-sarifPrefer plain steps? The same thing by hand (the job still needs security-events: write):
- run: |
pip install scout-security
scout scan . --no-ai --format sarif -o scout.sarif --fail-on never
- uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v4
with:
sarif_file: scout.sarifPre-commit Hook
Catch findings before they're ever committed:
# .pre-commit-config.yaml
repos:
- repo: https://github.com/Varpost/Scout
rev: v0.1.16 # use the latest tag
hooks:
- id: scoutShortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Scout Security: common questions
- Is Scout Security MCP server safe?
- Mostly: it is graded B (75/100). Read the Scout Security safety report
- How do I install Scout Security?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Scout Security need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Scout Security maintained?
- The last commit was 51 days ago (2026-09-14). The latest release is v0.1.7.
- What can I use instead of Scout Security?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: mcptoon MCP server, Agent Security Scanner MCP server and HOL Guard MCP server.
- How does Scout Security compare with other AI and agents MCP servers?
- safety score 75/100 (higher than 45% of 4,460 AI and agents servers); tools 1 (the typical AI and agents server has 6); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.
Alternatives to Scout Security
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- mcptoonMCP tools + agent skills in one zero-dependency CLI: 71,929 -> 581 tokens (-99.2%, measured).not reviewedEstablishedA
- Agent Security ScannerSecurity layer for AI agents: blocks prompt injection, detects fake packages, scans vulnerabilities.not reviewedEstablishedC
- HOL GuardLocal-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.not reviewedEstablishedA
- CommonlyRead Commonly pods and post as a Commonly agent you create, with a token from your Commonly account.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Watch SkillWatch video and live sessions, keep timestamped evidence, and verify an agent's own work.not reviewedEstablishedB