GitHub Actions Audit MCP server
online · 100% uptimeGitHub Actions workflow security audit - 21 checks: pinning, permissions, secrets, injection.
0 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed GitHub Actions Audit yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
GitHub Actions Audit tools
Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 376ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityauth enforced (unknown)9/15
- Maintenancelast push 108 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
How GitHub Actions Audit compares
Against every graded Developer tools MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 40% of 1,119 Developer tools servers
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote Developer tools server answers 100%
- Response time
- 220 ms
- faster than 55% of 443 Developer tools servers
Install GitHub Actions Audit in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add --transport http github-actions-audit https://unbearable-dev--github-actions-audit.apify.actor/mcp
What the publisher says
From the GitHub Actions Audit repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
GitHub Actions Security Audit
MCP server that audits .github/workflows/.yml files for supply-chain risks. Catches script injection, leaked tokens, unpinned actions, broad permissions, and pullrequest_target foot-guns — the patterns behind several 2024–2025 supply-chain incidents.
Built by Unbearable Labs. Pay-per-event — only billed when a tool is actually called.
Available on
- Apify Actor Store — primary, metered usage (PPE)
- MCPize — pending submission
- MCP.so — pending submission
- PulseMCP — pending submission
- Smithery — pending submission
- Glama — pending submission
Newsletter: Unbearable TechTips Weekly · All Actors: github.com/UnbearableDev
What it does
Point any MCP-capable client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, n8n, Make, Zapier, custom agents) at this server, hand it a workflow YAML, and get back structured findings with:
- Severity — critical / high / medium / low / info
- Affected job and step — exact location of the problem
- Description — why it matters, with the actual attack vector
- Remediation — what to do about it
- Fix snippet — YAML you can paste directly
Tools
Provide exactly one of workflowyaml (paste the content) or workflowurl (HTTPS URL — typically a GitHub raw URL to a specific workflow file).
Check catalog (v2: 21 checks)
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
GitHub Actions Audit: common questions
- Is GitHub Actions Audit MCP server safe?
- Mostly: it is graded B (75/100). Read the GitHub Actions Audit safety report
- How do I install GitHub Actions Audit?
- It runs remotely at unbearable-dev--github-actions-audit.apify.actor. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
- Does GitHub Actions Audit need an API key?
- Yes. The registry entry asks for
Authorization. - Is GitHub Actions Audit maintained?
- The last commit was 144 days ago (2026-06-11). The latest release is v1.0.1.
- Is GitHub Actions Audit up?
- 100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
- What can I use instead of GitHub Actions Audit?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: cloud-audit MCP server, Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis MCP server and zanadir MCP server.
- How does GitHub Actions Audit compare with other Developer tools MCP servers?
- safety score 75/100 (higher than 40% of 1,119 Developer tools servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote Developer tools server answers 100%); response time 220 ms (faster than 55% of 443 Developer tools servers). Full comparison.
Alternatives to GitHub Actions Audit
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- cloud-auditAWS security scanner with attack chain detection, IAM privilege escalation, and fixesnot reviewedEstablishedA
- Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency AnalysisCodebase analysis: dependency graphs, security scanning, and refactor plans for GitHub and GitLab.not reviewedGrowingC
- zanadirFind what a repository's CI is missing, and which security checks cannot fail the build.not reviewedGrowingB
- GntGit-native policy layer for AI agents: check_action verdicts against rules approved via PR.not reviewedGrowingA
- Pare GithubPare GitHub ג€” Structured GitHub operations (PRs, issues, actions) as typed JSON.not reviewedGrowingA