MCP.Market

Explicit Formula — Second Brain MCP server

by travisbergen2·io.github.travisbergen2/second-brain·v0.1.0

Your own notes, searched and cited by your AI — local-only, allowlist-gated, capped, and logged.

A92/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A92/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

0 stars32 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Explicit Formula — Second Brain yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Explicit Formula — Second Brain tools (4)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • list_second_brain

    List the notes the user has allowed (metadata only: path, title, last-modified date \u2014 no content). Newest first, up to 200. Optional folder filter. Use it to browse before reading.

  • read_second_brain_note

    Read a single note by its vault path (as returned by search or list). Returns up to 8000 characters per call; when truncated, call again with the offset the result gives you. Only notes inside the user's allowed folders can be read.

  • save_to_second_brain

    Save a NEW note into the user's second brain \u2014 only when the user asks to keep something. Writes only into their write-back folder (never elsewhere), never overwrites, and wikilinks the source notes you pass \u2014 so the note appears in their Obsidian graph connected to the knowledge it used. Pass the vault paths you actually drew from as sources.

  • search_second_brain

    Search the user's own notes for context relevant to the task. Returns up to 6 short snippets (\u22642400 chars total) chosen by a deterministic local scorer (their words \xD7 their note titles/headings \xD7 recency), each labeled with its source note path \u2014 cite those paths. Every snippet returned is disclosed to the user. Use plain topical words (as the user would title a note), not full sen

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-31 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 10 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 92/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Explicit Formula — Second Brain compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
92/100
higher than 95% of 48,255 servers
Tools
4
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week
32
more than 20% of 12,191 servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 3 read · 1 create

Install Explicit Formula — Second Brain in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

Runs npx -y @travisbergen2/second-brain-mcp on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add second-brain -- npx -y @travisbergen2/second-brain-mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Explicit Formula — Second Brain repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

RPCS-1 SDK — AI Agent Tuner

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.travisbergen2/rpcs1-agent-tuner -->

Start with the free tuner: find your AI agent’s likely failure mode, get runtime settings to try, and validate them with a harder case.

RPCS-1 helps teams make agent settings deliberate rather than guessed. Describe the task, change rate, predictability, stakes, relevant context horizon, and commitment style; it returns a five-primitive profile, a runtime recommendation, and a next test. The suite also includes SendRight for catching ambiguous prompts before handoff and the Translation Bridge for profile-aware communication rendering.

Repository Structure

rpcs1-sdk/
├── packages/core/          # TypeScript engine (@rpcs1/core): tuner + translation layer + receiver-profile intake
├── packages/web/           # Next.js app serving rpcs1.dev (tuner, translator, docs, Stripe, /mcp endpoint)
├── packages/mcp-server/    # Standalone STDIO MCP server (what Glama and MCP clients build)
├── sdk/python/             # Python SDK (pip install rpcs1)
├── skills/                 # Canonical agent skill package (HF-HATP v2.0 SKILL.md)
├── docs/                   # Architecture, deployment, launch playbook
└── .github/workflows/      # CI/CD

Quick Start — Python SDK

pip install rpcs1
from rpcs1 import recommend_params

config = recommend_params(
    task_description="Customer support agent",
    environment_entropy="dynamic",
    environment_predictability="somewhat_predictable",
    stakes="high",
    target_platform="anthropic",
)

print(config.platform_parameters.temperature)   # e.g. 0.52
print(config.predicted_regime)                  # 'stable'
print(config.reasoning)                         # cites Matching Principle

Quick Start — TypeScript Core

import { recommend } from '@rpcs1/core';

const rec = recommend({
  task: { task_summary: 'Customer support agent' },
  environment: {
    entropy: 'dynamic',
    predictability: 'somewhat_predictable',
    stakes: 'high',
    context_relevance: 'medium',
    commitment_style: 'cautious',
  },
  target_platform: 'anthropic',
});

console.log(rec.platform_parameters.temperature);
console.log(rec.predicted_regime);

Development

# Install dependencies
npm ci --include=optional

# Build and test TypeScript core
npm run build --workspace=@rpcs1/core
npm run test --workspace=@rpcs1/core

# Test Python SDK
cd sdk/python
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest -v

Web environment variables are documented in packages/web/.env.example (Stripe, Resend, license signing, rate limits). MCP production controls are listed under Production controls below.

The web app deploys to Vercel on Node 24 (region iad1); pushes to main trigger the production deployment.

The Matching Principle

The SDK implements Pred-09-5 from IMM Paper 9:

Stable receivers in an environment with entropy H satisfy TI ~ 1/H.

High-entropy environments → short attention windows (TI ~ 10). Low-entropy environments → long attention windows (TI ~ 90).

Every parameter recommendation traces back to this principle or the basin stability geometry (oscillation/overload/freeze boundary conditions).

Web App

  • Free Tuner: https://rpcs1.dev/tuner
  • SendRight: https://rpcs1.dev/send
  • Translation Bridge: https://rpcs1.dev/translator
  • Calibrate a communication-preference profile: https://rpcs1.dev/calibrate

The site can also explain the same product facts in technical, executive, plain-language, or literal-and-precise registers. The explanation changes; pricing, deliverables, and limitations do not.

Brand — Explicit Formula (product) / RPCS-1 (mechanism)

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Explicit Formula — Second Brain: common questions

Is Explicit Formula — Second Brain MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (92/100). Read the Explicit Formula — Second Brain safety report
How do I install Explicit Formula — Second Brain?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Explicit Formula — Second Brain need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Explicit Formula — Second Brain maintained?
The last commit was 14 days ago (2026-10-21). The latest release is v0.1.0.
What can I use instead of Explicit Formula — Second Brain?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: CPU Performance Engineering MCP server.
How does Explicit Formula — Second Brain compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 92/100 (higher than 95% of 48,255 servers); tools 4 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Explicit Formula — Second Brain

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • CPU Performance Engineering
    A CPU performance engineering brain: a vetted reading list, benchmarks and cited source passages
    A