MCP.Market

Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability MCP server

by TonyC23·io.github.TonyC23/systemonomic-mcp·v0.1.2

Model work domains, score tasks for AI suitability, and design organisations.

B72/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B72/100

full report

Adoption
New

0 stars22 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability tools (34, 9 write)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • accept_suggestions

    Accept task suggestions, promoting them to actual project tasks.

  • apply_proposal

    Apply an AI-generated restructure proposal to the project.

  • create_org_snapshotwrite action

    Create a snapshot of the current org design for version control.

  • create_projectwrite action

    Create a new project.

  • create_taskwrite action

    Create a new task in a project.

  • create_wda_linkwrite action

    Create a means-ends link between two WDA nodes.

  • create_wda_nodewrite action

    Create a new WDA node at a specific level.

  • delete_wda_linkwrite action

    Delete a means-ends link between two WDA nodes.

  • delete_wda_nodewrite action

    Delete a WDA node and all its connected links.

  • derive_task_suggestions

    Use AI to derive detailed task suggestions from WDA objects.

  • export_org_design_json

    Export the org design as a JSON document.

  • export_project

    Export a complete project (WDA, tasks, ATSS, org design) as JSON.

  • generate_pdf_report

    Generate a comprehensive PDF report for a project.

  • generate_tasks_from_wda

    Auto-generate tasks from the WDA Objects level.

  • generate_wda

    Generate a complete WDA from a text description using AI.

  • get_atss_results

    Get stored ATSS results for a project.

  • get_org_design

    Get the current organizational design for a project.

  • get_project_state

    Get the complete state of a project: WDA nodes, links, tasks, ATSS results, and org design.

  • get_project_stats

    Get summary statistics for a project: node counts by level, task count, ATSS completion, etc.

  • get_report_status

    Check the readiness status of a project's report.

  • import_wda

    Import WDA nodes and links into an existing project.

  • list_atss_runs

    List all ATSS assessment runs for a project, with timestamps and summaries.

  • list_org_snapshots

    List all org design snapshots for a project.

  • list_projects

    List all projects owned by the authenticated user.

  • list_suggestions

    List all pending task suggestions for a project.

  • list_tasks

    List all tasks in a project.

  • list_wda_links

    List all means-ends links in a project's WDA.

  • list_wda_nodes

    List all WDA nodes in a project.

  • persist_atss_results

    Persist ATSS assessment results to the project.

  • persist_org_design

    Save an organizational design to a project.

  • propose_restructure

    Generate an AI-powered restructure proposal from ATSS results.

  • run_atss_batchwrite action

    Run ATSS (Automated Task Suitability Scoring) on all tasks in a project.

  • update_wda_nodewrite action

    Update an existing WDA node's label, level, or description.

  • validate_raci

    Validate the RACI matrix for a project.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan7 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
  • Maintenancelast push 168 days ago8/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 72/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability compares

Against every graded Productivity MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
72/100
higher than 33% of 1,299 Productivity servers
Tools
34
the typical Productivity server has 7
Tools that change things
26%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week
22
more than 7% of 427 Productivity servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 20 read · 9 create · 1 change · 2 delete · 2 run or deploy

Install Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add systemonomic-mcp -- uvx systemonomic-mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Systemonomic MCP Servers

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.TonyC23/systemonomic-mcp -->

MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that expose Systemonomic's Work Domain Analysis, ATSS assessment, and organizational design capabilities to AI agents (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Claude Code, etc.).

Quick Start

1. Install

pip install systemonomic-mcp

2. Get an API Key

  1. Log in to Systemonomic
  2. Go to Profile → API Keys
  3. Click Generate API Key
  4. Copy the key (starts with sksys) — it's shown only once

3. Configure

Set the environment variable:

export SYSTEMONOMIC_API_KEY="sk_sys_your_key_here"

Optionally, point to a different API endpoint (defaults to production):

export SYSTEMONOMIC_API_URL="https://your-dev-backend.up.railway.app"

4. Add to Claude Desktop

Add to your claudedesktopconfig.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "systemonomic-wda": {
      "command": "python",
      "args": ["-m", "systemonomic_mcp.wda_server"],
      "env": {
        "SYSTEMONOMIC_API_KEY": "sk_sys_your_key_here"
      }
    },
    "systemonomic-atss": {
      "command": "python",
      "args": ["-m", "systemonomic_mcp.atss_server"],
      "env": {
        "SYSTEMONOMIC_API_KEY": "sk_sys_your_key_here"
      }
    },
    "systemonomic-org": {
      "command": "python",
      "args": ["-m", "systemonomic_mcp.org_server"],
      "env": {
        "SYSTEMONOMIC_API_KEY": "sk_sys_your_key_here"
      }
    }
  }
}

5. Add to Cursor

In Cursor Settings → MCP Servers, add each server:

  • Name: systemonomic-wda
  • Command: python -m systemonomicmcp.wdaserver
  • Environment: SYSTEMONOMICAPIKEY=sksys...

Repeat for atssserver and orgserver.

Available Servers

systemonomic-wda — Work Domain Analysis

systemonomic-atss — Assessment & Tasks

systemonomic-org — Organizational Design

Example Conversations

"Help me model our procurement process"

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability: common questions

Is Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (72/100). Read the Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability safety report
How do I install Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for SYSTEMONOMIC_API_KEY.
Is Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability maintained?
The last commit was 205 days ago (2026-04-13). The latest release is v0.1.2.
What can I use instead of Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: CLEO MCP Server, Google Calendar MCP server and Obsidian Vault MCP server.
How does Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability compare with other Productivity MCP servers?
safety score 72/100 (higher than 33% of 1,299 Productivity servers); tools 34 (the typical Productivity server has 7); tools that change things 26% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Systemonomic — Work Domain Analysis & AI Task Suitability

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • CLEO MCP Server
    Task management for AI coding agents — CQRS 2-gateway pattern, 200 ops across 10 domains
    B
  • Google Calendar
    MCP server for Google Calendar integration with service account support and domain-wide delegation.
    A
  • Obsidian Vault MCP
    Local Zotero, MinerU, Obsidian literature workflow with transactional Analysis notes.
    A