MCP.Market

NeuroDock Guardrail MCP server

by tlennon-ie·io.github.tlennon-ie/neurodock-mcp-guardrail·v0.0.5·14 stars

Advisory detectors for rumination, hyperfocus, and sycophancy. Never silently blocks.

A92/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A92/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

14 stars20 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed NeuroDock Guardrail yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

NeuroDock Guardrail tools (3)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • check_hyperfocus
  • check_rumination
  • check_sycophancy

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan20 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 6 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 92/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How NeuroDock Guardrail compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
92/100
higher than 95% of 48,255 servers
Tools
3
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
GitHub stars
14
more than 90% of 28,688 servers
Downloads a week
20
more than 7% of 12,191 servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 3 read

Install NeuroDock Guardrail in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add neurodock-mcp-guardrail -- uvx neurodock-mcp-guardrail
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the NeuroDock Guardrail repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

NeuroDock

A cognitive substrate that remembers, paces, and refuses. Built with neurodivergent professionals, not for them.

5-second TL;DR

  • What it does: gives Claude a memory of your work, a sense of time, a refuse-rumination guardrail, and a translator for corporate ambiguity.
  • Who it's for: neurodivergent people — self-ID only, no diagnosis required, no gatekeeping.
  • How to install: one command, below.

NeuroDock plugs into Claude Desktop / Claude Code / Cursor (any MCP-aware client). Local-first by default. No telemetry. AGPL-3.0-or-later.

How it fits together

You chat with Claude exactly like normal. Under the hood, Claude calls NeuroDock's local MCP servers; they read and write your local store; the result flows back into Claude's reply.

Everything runs on your laptop. Nothing leaves your machine unless you explicitly turn on a cloud option.

Install

npx --yes @neurodock/cli@latest install-all

One command. It pip-installs the five MCP servers (plus the neurodock-evals harness), wires Claude Desktop / Claude Code / Cursor, and drops a starter profile at ~/.neurodock/profile.yaml.

Then, in any conversation, try one of:

What was I working on yesterday?
Plan my morning.
Decompose this goal into atomic tasks.

Claude calls the MCP tools under the hood; you just talk.

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

NeuroDock Guardrail: common questions

Is NeuroDock Guardrail MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (92/100). Read the NeuroDock Guardrail safety report
How do I install NeuroDock Guardrail?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does NeuroDock Guardrail need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is NeuroDock Guardrail maintained?
The last commit was 44 days ago (2026-09-21). The latest release is v0.0.5.
How does NeuroDock Guardrail compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 92/100 (higher than 95% of 48,255 servers); tools 3 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

More from tlennon-ie →