FreightUtils MCP Server
online · 100% uptimeio.github.SoapyRED/freightutils·v2.31.0·7 starsNeutral freight reference + validation layer for AI agents: ADR, HS, UN/LOCODE, freight math
not scanned yet
7 stars1.3k downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed FreightUtils MCP Server yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
FreightUtils MCP Server tools
Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.
How FreightUtils MCP Server compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 91/100
- higher than 85% of 48,243 servers
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
- Response time
- 361 ms
- faster than 45% of 30,027 servers
- GitHub stars
- 7
- more than 86% of 28,706 servers
- Downloads a week
- 1,253
- more than 95% of 12,306 servers with a package
Release history: 13 versions in the registry since 2026-09-08, latest 2026-11-05, typically one every 1 day.
Install FreightUtils MCP Server in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add --transport http freightutils https://www.freightutils.com/api/mcp
What the publisher says
From the FreightUtils MCP Server repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
FreightUtils MCP Server
The neutral freight reference layer for AI agents.
FreightUtils is the neutral freight reference layer for AI agents — source-backed dangerous-goods, customs, location and freight-calculation data an agent can call and cite, from primary sources (ADR 2025 / UNECE, HS 2022 / WCO, IATA-regulated airline prefixes). Neutral by design: no freight to sell and no carrier to push — a lookup returns what the named source says, with the citation attached so an agent can inspect it rather than take our word for it, regardless of who carries the load.
This Model Context Protocol server gives AI agents access to 25 freight calculation and reference tools, covering road, air, and sea freight. Built by a UK ADR-certified freight transport planner.
Every response cites its source — a source block with the authority, edition, licence where held, and a verification status an agent can read — and the tools are deterministic, not generated answers. Reference only: never filing, booking, or legal advice, and results state when human review is required (validate is structural check-digit validation only; a clean ics2check is not ENS acceptance; emissions figures are estimates, not audited reports).
Since 2.11.0, every tool also declares a typed outputSchema and returns structuredContent — the FreightUtils v1 response envelope: the answer under result, plus confidence, normalizedinput, warnings, source and a ready-to-use citation. The legacy flat JSON text channel is unchanged (byte-identical), so existing text-parsing consumers are unaffected.
Website: https://www.freightutils.com API Docs: https://www.freightutils.com/api-docs
Tools (25)
Calculators
Dangerous Goods (ADR)
Customs & Tariff
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
FreightUtils MCP Server: common questions
- Is FreightUtils MCP Server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (91/100). Read the FreightUtils MCP Server safety report
- How do I install FreightUtils MCP Server?
- It runs remotely at www.freightutils.com. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
- Does FreightUtils MCP Server need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is FreightUtils MCP Server maintained?
- The last commit was 22 days ago (2026-10-14). The latest release is v2.31.0.
- Is FreightUtils MCP Server up?
- 100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
- How does FreightUtils MCP Server compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 91/100 (higher than 85% of 48,243 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 361 ms (faster than 45% of 30,027 servers). Full comparison.