Web To Markdown MCP server
io.github.sidney/web-to-markdown-mcp·v0.6.0MCP server fetches URL through a real Chromium browser, returns main content as clean Markdown
0 stars23 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Web To Markdown yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Web To Markdown tools (1)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsRead from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.
fetch_url_as_markdown
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan3 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 63 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
How Web To Markdown compares
Against every graded Scraping and browsing MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 88/100
- higher than 70% of 866 Scraping and browsing servers
- Tools
- 1
- the typical Scraping and browsing server has 6
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Downloads a week
- 23
- more than 5% of 309 Scraping and browsing servers with a package
What its tools let an agent do: 1 read
Install Web To Markdown in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add web-to-markdown-mcp -- uvx web-to-markdown-mcp
What the publisher says
From the Web To Markdown repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
web-to-markdown-mcp
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.sidney/web-to-markdown-mcp -->
An MCP server that fetches a URL and returns the main content as clean Markdown. Uses plain HTTP when possible and real Chromium when needed.
Why
Most MCP web-fetch tools either:
- use plain HTTP, which fails on JS-required pages and gets blocked by Cloudflare bot detection on many sites; or
- use a real browser but return raw HTML or accessibility-tree snapshots, which are noisy and token-heavy when you just want to read the article.
This server uses a three-tier strategy, using the fastest approach that works for each URL:
- Native markdown fast-path. Every request first tries a plain HTTP GET with an Accept: text/markdown header. Servers that support content negotiation — such as Cloudflare-hosted sites with Markdown for Agents enabled — respond with Content-Type: text/markdown, and the body is returned immediately with no browser overhead.
- Plain HTTP + extraction. If the server returns HTML, trafilatura extracts the article body as clean Markdown directly from the static response. Heuristics detect JS shells — pages that return only a "JavaScript required" stub in the static HTML — and fall through to tier 3 for those.
- Headless browser. When tiers 1 and 2 yield nothing usable, patchright (a Playwright fork with anti-detection patches) drives real Chromium and trafilatura extracts the rendered content. A single headless browser instance is kept alive across calls — it launches lazily on the first browser-tier fetch and stays running for the session, so subsequent fetches pay only navigation time rather than Chromium startup cost (~2–5 s).
For sites that block even headless patchright (aggressive bot detection), pass headless=False. This uses a visible Chromium window — slower and visually intrusive, but clears most remaining challenges. A headed browser is launched and closed for each fetch that needs it; it is not kept persistent since headed fetches are an infrequent escape hatch rather than the common case.
After browser navigation, the server polls the DOM and runs trafilatura, returning as soon as two consecutive polls produce the same extraction. This means it returns within a few hundred milliseconds for typical pages — rather than waiting for analytics, ads, and other late-loading resources to finish — and gives slow SPAs and bot-challenge clearance time to settle without timing out prematurely.
For a typical article, expect roughly 80% fewer tokens than the raw HTML and roughly 90% fewer than a full accessibility-tree snapshot.
Installation
Requires Python 3.10+ and a one-time Chromium download (~300 MB).
# Run directly with uv (no install step)
uvx web-to-markdown-mcp
# Or install with pip
pip install web-to-markdown-mcp
# One-time browser download
patchright install chromiumMCP client configuration
Claude Desktop
Edit your config file:
- macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claudedesktopconfig.json
- Windows: %APPDATA%\Claude\claudedesktopconfig.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"web-to-markdown": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["web-to-markdown-mcp"]
}
}
}Restart Claude Desktop.
LM Studio
Edit ~/.lmstudio/mcp.json (Developer tab → Edit mcp.json) — same JSON block as above. Then enable Allow calling servers from mcp.json in the Developer tab's Server Settings. The server appears in the Integrations tab of any new chat.
Cursor / Windsurf / VS Code
Same JSON block, in each client's MCP config location.
Claude Code
claude mcp add web-to-markdown -- uvx web-to-markdown-mcpUsage
The server exposes a single tool:
fetchurlas_markdown
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Web To Markdown: common questions
- Is Web To Markdown MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the Web To Markdown safety report
- How do I install Web To Markdown?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Web To Markdown need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Web To Markdown maintained?
- The last commit was 101 days ago (2026-07-26). The latest release is v0.6.0.
- What can I use instead of Web To Markdown?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: One Search MCP server, WebReaper MCP server and Browser Scraper MCP server.
- How does Web To Markdown compare with other Scraping and browsing MCP servers?
- safety score 88/100 (higher than 70% of 866 Scraping and browsing servers); tools 1 (the typical Scraping and browsing server has 6); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.
Alternatives to Web To Markdown
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- One SearchWeb search, URL discovery, scraping & extraction with agent-browser and search providersnot reviewedGrowingB
WebReaperAI-native web scraper: scrape, crawl and map any site to clean markdown over stdio. MIT-licensed.not reviewedGrowingA- Browser ScraperStealth Chrome for AI agents: bot-protected sites, Turnstile, closed Shadow DOM, clean Markdown.not reviewedGrowingA
- SeleniumBase MCPStealthy browser automation, testing, and web-scraping via CDP Mode.not reviewedWidely usedA
- AIHawkAI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.not reviewedWidely usedA