MCP.Market

Periscope MCP server

by segentic-lab·io.github.segentic-lab/periscope-mcp·v0.10.4·10 stars

Web-app QA for AI agents: 73 Playwright tools — auth, E2E, a11y/SEO/GEO, Web Vitals + Lighthouse

C57/100grade C
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
C57/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

10 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Periscope yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Periscope tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityno auth information5/15
  • Maintenancelast push 70 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Overall 57/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Periscope compares

Against every graded SEO MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
57/100
higher than 10% of 769 SEO servers
GitHub stars
10
more than 90% of 400 SEO servers

Install Periscope in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.

What the publisher says

From the Periscope repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

periscope-mcp

An MCP server that gives AI agents 74 Playwright tools to QA, test, and analyze web apps — static sites, SPAs, and apps behind a login — returning hard verdicts, not screenshots to squint at. Not a thin wrapper around browser APIs; the tools are shaped around how agents actually work:

passed: true/false with the actual value; checks return structured issues.

  • Hard results, not screenshot-squinting — assert_condition returns

whole form; interactandtest batches 25 action types with checks; test_project crawls and audits an entire site.

  • One call instead of ten — autofillform detects, infers, and fills a

cookie auth, plus a visible interactive login for 2FA/SSO/CAPTCHA that then runs headless), multi-step flows, network mocking, state snapshots, and real INP measured from the interactions it drives.

  • Real web-app testing — persistent authenticated sessions (form/basic/

(expired session vs. browser crash vs. eviction); silent no-ops like ignored drags come back flagged, not as fake success.

  • Honest responses — failures say what happened and what to do next

network mocking, and state snapshots/diffs, no setup calls needed.

  • Debugging built in — captured API response bodies, console/network logs,

GEO/agentic-search readiness (robots.txt AI-crawler access, llms.txt, WebMCP), plus real Lighthouse.

  • Audits agents can't get from a browser binding — accessibility, SEO, and

Playwright + headless Chrome underneath; site crawling, responsive testing, and screenshot diffing on top. Works with any MCP client — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, custom agents, or anything else that speaks MCP over stdio.

Why not just playwright-mcp?

playwright-mcp is excellent at what it is: general browser control over MCP, with tools that mirror Playwright's own API. If the job is "browse this site, click around, extract something," use it.

Periscope exists for a different job: testing and auditing a site or web app, then reporting findings — and its tools encode the testing knowledge an agent would otherwise have to reinvent every session:

The two aren't rivals — an agent can happily use playwright-mcp for browsing tasks and Periscope when it's wearing the QA hat. Periscope's design bets are simply about that hat: fewer, higher-level calls; structured verdicts instead of raw page state; and errors written to tell the agent what to do next.

Architecture

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Periscope: common questions

Is Periscope MCP server safe?
With care: it is graded C, so read the findings first (57/100). Read the Periscope safety report
Does Periscope need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Periscope maintained?
The last commit was 107 days ago (2026-07-18). The latest release is v0.10.4.
What can I use instead of Periscope?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Saglitzdesign MCP server, Robot Speed MCP server and Google Ads + Meta Ads + SEO/GEO MCP server.
How does Periscope compare with other SEO MCP servers?
safety score 57/100 (higher than 10% of 769 SEO servers); github stars 10 (more than 90% of 400 SEO servers). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Periscope

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Saglitzdesign
    Expert design & marketing MCP: UI/UX, design languages, SEO/GEO, tokens, a11y, recipes.
    A
  • Robot Speed
    SEO tools for AI agents: audits, Core Web Vitals, keywords, AI visibility, traffic, backlinks.
    A
  • Google Ads + Meta Ads + SEO/GEO MCP
    Google Ads, Meta Ads, Google Analytics (GA4) & Search Console MCP server by Ryze AI
    A
  • Web Validator by DigestSEO
    Audit public webpages and supplied markup for HTML, CSS, SEO, JSON-LD, and link issues.
    A
  • RankCLI
    Free, local SEO + GEO audits for AI assistants - no signup, nothing leaves your machine.
    A

More from segentic-lab →