MCP.Market

Almanac MCP server

by savecharlie·io.github.savecharlie/almanac·v0.1.2

Verified ephemeris & WMM2025 geomagnetic compute: the physical numbers LLMs hallucinate, done right.

A92/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A92/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

0 stars118 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Almanac yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Almanac tools (2)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • magnetic_field

    Earth's magnetic field from the official World Magnetic Model 2025.

  • sky_positions

    Sun, Moon and planet positions and events for a place and time.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan5 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 22 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 92/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Almanac compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
92/100
higher than 93% of 48,243 servers
Tools
2
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week
118
more than 66% of 12,306 servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 2 read

Install Almanac in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add almanac -- uvx almanac-compute
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Almanac repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

almanac

Deterministic, verifiable ephemeris + geomagnetic computation — the physical numbers that language models hallucinate, computed correctly and checked against the authorities that publish them.

Two pure-compute cores, no API keys, no network for the math, same inputs → same bytes:

Magnetic Model 2025: magnetic declination (the angle a compass reads off true north), inclination, intensity, the X/Y/Z vector, and secular variation, for any location/altitude/date. Pure Python standard library — zero dependencies.*

  • almanac.geomag — the Earth's magnetic field from the official **World

Sun/Moon/planet altitude–azimuth–distance, rise/set/transit, the four twilight phases, moon phase + illumination, ecliptic ("zodiac") longitude, day length, next new/full moon and next equinox/solstice, for any location/time.

  • almanac.ephemeris — the sky from the public-domain JPL DE421 kernel:

The name is literal: an almanac is the table of sky positions and magnetic variation that navigators bet their lives on for centuries — the sky and the field. This is that, made machine-checkable.

Why this exists

Ask a language model "what's the magnetic declination at 40°N 105°W in 2026?" or "where's the Moon over Tokyo right now?" and it will answer — confidently, and usually wrong. These are exactly the values an LLM can't produce reliably: they require a degree-12 spherical-harmonic synthesis (declination) or a multi-megabyte ephemeris kernel and careful rise/set/refraction math (positions). Getting them wrong points a ship, a drone, or a survey the wrong way.

almanac doesn't guess. It computes — deterministically — and the correctness is provable, not asserted:

Correctness (the whole point)

geomag is a faithful port of NOAA's geomag70 reference algorithm; the proof is the authority grading our independent synthesis against its own numbers. Run it yourself:

pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest -q
# tests/test_geomag.py ....... 107 passed   (the 100 NOAA points + edge cases)
# tests/test_ephemeris.py .... 7 passed     (cross-engine + known-truth)

Quickstart

pip install -e .          # geomag works immediately (stdlib only)
                          # ephemeris pulls in skyfield + the public-domain DE421 kernel
from almanac.geomag import compute as field
from almanac.ephemeris import compute as sky

# Magnetic declination in Boulder, CO, mid-2026 — what your compass is off by:
f = field(lat=40.015, lon=-105.27, when="2026-06-26")
print(f["declination_deg"], "-", f["compass_note"])
# 7.6892 - magnetic north is 7.69 deg east of true north

# The sky over New York at a given instant:
s = sky(lat=40.7128, lon=-74.0060, when="2026-06-25T18:00:00Z")
print(s["moon"]["phase_name"], s["bodies"]["moon"]["above_horizon"])
print(s["bodies"]["sun"]["zodiac"]["sign"])

Every result is a plain JSON-serializable dict, fully labeled with units, and deterministic — the same query returns the same bytes, every time, on any machine.

API

almanac.geomag.compute(lat, lon, altitude_km=0.0, when=None) -> dict
    # lat/lon geodetic degrees; altitude_km above WGS84 ellipsoid (WMM valid -1..850);
    # when = ISO date/datetime, a bare decimal year like "2027.5", or "now"/None.
    # WMM2025 is valid 2025.0–2030.0. Declination positive = east of true north.

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Almanac: common questions

Is Almanac MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (92/100). Read the Almanac safety report
How do I install Almanac?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Almanac need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Almanac maintained?
The last commit was 54 days ago (2026-09-12). The latest release is v0.1.2.
How does Almanac compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 92/100 (higher than 93% of 48,243 servers); tools 2 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.