Route & Logistics Optimizer MCP server
online · 100% uptimePlan vehicle routes, job assignments and load packing from stops, fleet and constraints.
B77/100grade B
Safety scan
B77/100
not scanned yet
Adoption
New
Little public usage data yet
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Route & Logistics Optimizer yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Route & Logistics Optimizer tools
Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.
How Route & Logistics Optimizer compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 77/100
- higher than 50% of 48,255 servers
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
- Response time
- 1,264 ms
- faster than 8% of 30,031 servers
Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-10-22, latest 2026-10-27, typically one every 5 days.
Install Route & Logistics Optimizer in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add --transport http route-optimizer https://route-optimizer-mcp.saifs.ai/mcp
Route & Logistics Optimizer: common questions
- Is Route & Logistics Optimizer MCP server safe?
- Mostly: it is graded B (77/100). Read the Route & Logistics Optimizer safety report
- How do I install Route & Logistics Optimizer?
- It runs remotely at route-optimizer-mcp.saifs.ai. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
- Does Route & Logistics Optimizer need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Route & Logistics Optimizer maintained?
- The latest release is v1.0.1.
- Is Route & Logistics Optimizer up?
- 100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
- How does Route & Logistics Optimizer compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 77/100 (higher than 50% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 1,264 ms (faster than 8% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.