mitracore — trust layer for agent work MCP server
online · 89% uptimeVerify the artifact, meter the cost, enforce the mandate — one call.
0 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed mitracore — trust layer for agent work yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
mitracore — trust layer for agent work tools (5)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postscheck_skillFreeПриватно проверить SKILL.md: структура, триггеры, секреты, prompt-injection, битые ссылки. Возвращает вердикт, балл и sha256 (готово к подписи).
quote_costFreeПосчитать цену по фактическому расходу (токены, CPU, байты, записи, внешние вызовы) — вместо прайсовой таблицы.
suite_statusFreeЖивое состояние слоёв Suite: attest, agentpay, drift, skilllint.
trust_reportFreeСводный вердикт по артефакту агента: проверка работы (attest) + цена по факту (agentpay) + доступность мандатов (drift).
verify_workFreeПроверить артефакт агента (4 слоя: схема, пустота, provenance, полномочия). Возвращает вердикт attest.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 5401ms12/20
- Tool poisoning5 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
- Maintenancelast push 4 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityendpoint served from the registry-verified namespace domain8/10
How mitracore — trust layer for agent work compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 80/100
- higher than 60% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools
- 5
- the typical AI and agents server has 6
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 89%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote AI and agents server answers 100%
- Response time
- 878 ms
- faster than 12% of 2,331 AI and agents servers
What its tools let an agent do: 5 read
Install mitracore — trust layer for agent work in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add --transport http mitracore https://rta.lat/mitracore/mcp
What the publisher says
From the mitracore — trust layer for agent work repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
mitracore
Trust layer for agent work: verify the artifact, meter what it cost, enforce the mandate.
Three risks, one call:
- verify - four layers over an agent artifact: schema conformance, emptiness (uniform lists, stub values, truncations), generation provenance, authority (was the action permitted). Ed25519-signed receipt, verifiable offline, no trust in this service required.
- quote - price what the call actually consumed (tokens, CPU seconds, bytes out, storage writes, external calls) from a published rate card, with the breakdown attached.
- mandates - limits, allowlist and kill switch for what an agent may do.
Use it
MCP (recommended):
npx -y mcp-remote https://rta.lat/mitracore/mcp # hosted
python3 mcp_server.py # stdio
python3 mcp_server.py --http 8192 # streamable httpPublic endpoints: POST https://rta.lat/mitracore/mcp (JSON-RPC 2.0), plus /v1/verify, /v1/quote, /v1/trust-report, /v1/skills/lint, /health.
Tools
verifywork(artifact, schema?) | checkskill(path) | quotecost(tokens, cpuseconds, bytesout, storagewrites, externalcalls) | trustreport(artifact, schema?) | suite_status()
Pricing
- 20 verifications per day - free, no card, no account
- 0.005 USDC per verification (x402), or 9 USDC for 30 days prepaid
- 49 USD per environment per month (prepaid, no auto-renewal)
Locales
en, hi - Hindi is a first-class interface, not a translation afterthought. India (Bharata) is included in pricing, docs and launch from day one; legal claims about India are taken only from official repositories, anything unverified is reported as pending.
Trust
Receipts are Ed25519-signed and the key fingerprint is published: any buyer can verify a completion locally, offline, without an account.
License: MIT
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
mitracore — trust layer for agent work: common questions
- Is mitracore — trust layer for agent work MCP server safe?
- Mostly: it is graded B (80/100). Read the mitracore — trust layer for agent work safety report
- How do I install mitracore — trust layer for agent work?
- It runs remotely at rta.lat. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
- Does mitracore — trust layer for agent work need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is mitracore — trust layer for agent work maintained?
- The last commit was 13 days ago (2026-10-22). The latest release is v0.1.0.
- Is mitracore — trust layer for agent work up?
- 89% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
- What can I use instead of mitracore — trust layer for agent work?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: agent-device MCP server, Watch Skill MCP server and Emilia Protocol MCP server.
- How does mitracore — trust layer for agent work compare with other AI and agents MCP servers?
- safety score 80/100 (higher than 60% of 4,460 AI and agents servers); tools 5 (the typical AI and agents server has 6); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.
Alternatives to mitracore — trust layer for agent work
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- agent-deviceOpen source device layer for AI agents: control mobile, web, TV, and desktop apps over MCPnot reviewedWidely usedA
- Watch SkillWatch video and live sessions, keep timestamped evidence, and verify an agent's own work.not reviewedEstablishedB
- Emilia ProtocolExact-action approval for consequential agent actions: request, track, and verify signed receipts.not reviewedEstablishedB
- MockserverMock, record/replay, verify and chaos-test any HTTP, REST, gRPC or LLM dependency over MCP.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Agent RecallCorrection-first agent memory. Precision KPI tracks if agents heed warnings. 5 layers, local-only.not reviewedEstablishedA