MCP.Market

Roraima for hosts MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by roraima.io·io.roraima/host·v1.1.1

Hosts: read and record bookings, change prices, draft listings, rename devices. No payments.

B77/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B77/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
New

Little public usage data yet

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Roraima for hosts yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Roraima for hosts tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Roraima for hosts compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
77/100
higher than 50% of 48,255 servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
141 ms
faster than 75% of 30,031 servers

Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-10-03, latest 2026-10-05, typically one every 1 day.

Install Roraima for hosts in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http host https://roraima.io/mcp/host
Add to Cursor

Roraima for hosts: common questions

Is Roraima for hosts MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (77/100). Read the Roraima for hosts safety report
How do I install Roraima for hosts?
It runs remotely at roraima.io. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Roraima for hosts need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Roraima for hosts maintained?
The latest release is v1.1.1.
Is Roraima for hosts up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
How does Roraima for hosts compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 77/100 (higher than 50% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 141 ms (faster than 75% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.