MCP.Market

Rami Code Review MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by rami.reviews·reviews.rami/rami·v1.0.0

AI code review for GitHub PRs with an MCP autofix loop for Claude Code and Cursor

A93/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A93/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Rami Code Review yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Rami Code Review tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 724ms (auth required)20/20
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
  • Maintenancelast push 6 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; website matches verified namespace6/10
Overall 93/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Rami Code Review compares

Against every graded Developer tools MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
93/100
higher than 96% of 1,119 Developer tools servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote Developer tools server answers 100%
Response time
444 ms
faster than 27% of 443 Developer tools servers

Install Rami Code Review in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http rami https://rami.reviews/mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Rami Code Review repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Rami Code Review

Works with Claude Code AND Codex. Rami reviews every PR for security, bugs, and performance — then fixes the findings through MCP. You stay in control of what merges.

Both clients are first-class: Claude Code loads the root plugin package, while Codex installs its isolated package from plugins/rami through the same marketplace repository.

Disputing Findings

Not every finding needs a fix. Push back when you have evidence — Rami evaluates the dispute and either accepts it or asks you to fix:

  • False positive — the code is actually correct
  • Framework guarantee — the framework handles this case
  • Intentional design — this is by design, not a mistake
  • Duplicate — the same issue is reported elsewhere

The dispute loop runs in the same session as the review, so accepted disputes drop out and only real issues land in your commits.

Getting Started

1. Install the GitHub App

Install Rami on your repository.

2. Add the marketplace

Claude Code:

/plugin marketplace add rami-code-review/claude-code-marketplace

Codex:

codex plugin marketplace add rami-code-review/claude-code-marketplace

3. Install the plugin

Claude Code:

/plugin install rami@rami-code-review

Codex:

codex plugin add rami@rami-code-review

Start a new Codex task after installation so the Rami skills and MCP tools are loaded.

4. Run a review

On a PR branch, run:

/rami:review

Rami fetches the review, walks each finding by priority, and applies fixes (or accepts disputes) until the PR is clean.

Commands

/rami:review

Full review-fix-dispute loop on the current PR branch:

  • Fetches review results
  • Walks findings by priority (blocking → high → medium → low)
  • Fixes each one — or lets you dispute with evidence
  • Commits and pushes
  • Repeats until clean (up to 5 iterations)

/rami:review-status

Check review status without triggering a new review.

/rami:usage

Check remaining quota and credit balance.

/rami:setup

Guided setup — installs the GitHub App, registers the MCP server, completes OAuth, and verifies the connection. Run this first if Rami isn't connected yet. It can also offer, only if you agree, to add a short removable Rami section to your CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md.

/rami:doctor

Read-only health check. Reports auth, GitHub App coverage, quota, and whether the plugin is up to date — with the fix for anything that's off.

/rami:upgrade

Updates the plugin to the latest published version and shows what changed.

Troubleshooting

"No PR found for branch" — push the branch and open a pull request.

"Authentication required" — install the Rami GitHub App on the repo.

Review taking too long? — /rami:review-status checks progress without triggering a new review.

Keeping Rami up to date

Rami checks once a day — silently — whether a newer plugin version is published, and nudges you when one is. To update at any time:

/rami:upgrade

Or manually:

claude plugin marketplace update rami-code-review
claude plugin update rami@rami-code-review

Then run /reload-plugins (or start a new session) to activate it.

For Codex:

codex plugin marketplace upgrade rami-code-review
codex plugin add rami@rami-code-review

Then start a new task to activate the updated plugin.

Links

  • Rami
  • GitHub App

License

MIT

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Rami Code Review: common questions

Is Rami Code Review MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (93/100). Read the Rami Code Review safety report
How do I install Rami Code Review?
It runs remotely at rami.reviews. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Rami Code Review need an API key?
No key to paste: it signs you in with OAuth when your client connects.
Is Rami Code Review maintained?
The last commit was 44 days ago (2026-09-21). The latest release is v1.0.0.
Is Rami Code Review up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
What can I use instead of Rami Code Review?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: GitHub MCP server, Gk CLI MCP server and uploads.sh MCP server.
How does Rami Code Review compare with other Developer tools MCP servers?
safety score 93/100 (higher than 96% of 1,119 Developer tools servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote Developer tools server answers 100%); response time 444 ms (faster than 27% of 443 Developer tools servers). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Rami Code Review

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • GitHub
    Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
    A
  • Gk CLI
    The GitKraken MCP Server for managing repos, PRs, issues across GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and more.
    B
  • uploads.sh
    Host files from coding agents; stage on a branch and attach to GitHub PRs.
    A
  • Pare Github
    Pare GitHub ג€” Structured GitHub operations (PRs, issues, actions) as typed JSON.
    A
  • GitDiagram
    Architecture diagrams, explanations and Mermaid source for public GitHub repositories.
    A