CodeSampleX MCP server
io.github.r2cuerdame/codesamplex·v0.2.23·2 starsCompatibility evidence from real builds: does this library API work on your versions and runtime?
not scanned yet
2 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed CodeSampleX yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
CodeSampleX tools
No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.
How CodeSampleX compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 88/100
- higher than 75% of 48,255 servers
- GitHub stars
- 2
- more than 75% of 28,688 servers
Release history: 8 versions in the registry since 2026-09-17, latest 2026-10-14, typically one every 2 days.
Install CodeSampleX in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.
What the publisher says
From the CodeSampleX repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
CodeSampleX
Tested. Not guessed.
Languages: English · 한국어 · 日本語 · 简体中文 · Español · Français · Deutsch · Português (BR) · Русский
CodeSampleX is an open compatibility testing network for developer libraries, runtimes and toolchains. It does not summarize documentation and it does not collect anecdotes. It records what real builds actually did, in environments recorded rather than assumed — then shows you where things worked, where they broke, and in which environment.
Two things are the asset, and a third is a bonus:
- Evidence — real builds on real developer machines, with the environment, stage, structured termination, and secret-safe normalized failure fingerprint. Missing or legacy failure detail is shown as an Evidence gap, never invented as a cause. It arrives automatically wherever csx is installed, so it reaches platforms no container lane can: no container reproduces a macOS host — Docker on a Mac runs a Linux VM, which is a different machine wearing the same laptop — npm publishes no Windows image, and the long tail of musl, ARM, corporate base images and actually-installed runtime versions is unbounded. This is the only thing that can fill the map.
- Findings — the contradictions we detected in that evidence: what a competent developer or model expects, measured against what happened. These are ours to stand behind, and they are what a model most often gets wrong, because they are exactly what the documentation does not say.
- Samples — runnable code we write and verify ourselves. A bonus, deliberately: a container farm can never cover the space, so a verified sample is a confidence tier above the evidence, never the condition for having an answer at all.
Which is why a miss is not empty. When nothing has been proven for your case the grade stays NOSAFEMATCH — and the recorded observations come back with it, as recorded.
- Compatibility map: https://codesamplex.dev
- The question it answers: does it run there? — this API, on this version, on this OS, under this runtime.
- The answer it gives: here is what happened, and here is where it ran. Reporters use rotating peer buckets; separate first-party activity analytics use a stable pseudonymous client ID, never a name or IP identity. See analytics semantics.
What ships today
CodeSampleX is no longer just a search command. The shipped product now exposes several surfaces, all backed by the same evidence model:
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Grade history
- 2026-09-19restoreC → Ascore 88
CodeSampleX: common questions
- Is CodeSampleX MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the CodeSampleX safety report
- Does CodeSampleX need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is CodeSampleX maintained?
- The last commit was 39 days ago (2026-09-26). The latest release is v0.2.23.
- How does CodeSampleX compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 88/100 (higher than 75% of 48,255 servers); github stars 2 (more than 75% of 28,688 servers). Full comparison.