MCP.Market

Water Quality Portal MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by pipeworx-io·io.github.pipeworx-io/water-quality-portal·v0.2.0

Water Quality Portal (WQP) MCP — US ambient water-chemistry monitoring

B73/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B73/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
Growing

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Water Quality Portal yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Water Quality Portal tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Water Quality Portal compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
73/100
higher than 39% of 48,255 servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
254 ms
faster than 55% of 30,031 servers

Release history: 3 versions in the registry since 2026-09-25, latest 2026-10-29, typically one every 32 days.

Install Water Quality Portal in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http water-quality-portal https://gateway.pipeworx.io/water-quality-portal/mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Water Quality Portal repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

@pipeworx/water-quality-portal

US ambient water-chemistry monitoring — station metadata and individual sample results from the joint USGS / EPA / NWQMC Water Quality Portal (NWIS, STORET and STEWARDS in one query surface).

Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1679+ live data sources.

Tools

  • wqpsearchsites(statecode?, countycode?, huc?, bbox?, siteType?, characteristicName?, organization?, limit?) — monitoring stations with coordinates, site type and how many results each holds. At least one filter is required.
  • wqpgetresults(siteid?, characteristicName?, statecode?, countycode?, startDate?, endDate?, sampleMedia?, limit?) — individual sample values with unit, method, depth and date.
  • wqpresultsnearpoint(latitude, longitude, withinmiles?, characteristicName?, startDate?, endDate?, limit?) — the same results inside a radius.
  • wqplistcharacteristics(domain?, text?, limit?) — the controlled-vocabulary spellings the portal demands ("Nitrate", not "nitrate").

Auth

Keyless.

Data sources

  • https://www.waterqualitydata.us/data/Station/search — station metadata (GeoJSON).
  • https://www.waterqualitydata.us/data/Result/search — sample results (CSV only).
  • https://www.waterqualitydata.us/Codes/ — controlled vocabularies (JSON).

Things the next person would otherwise rediscover:

and is rejected for Result; the CSV is parsed in-pack.

  • Result/search has no JSON profile. mimeType=geojson works for Station

tools take YYYY-MM-DD and convert, so callers never see it.

  • Dates on the wire are MM-DD-YYYY (startDateLo=01-01-2020), not ISO. The

its rows and reports truncated.

  • zip=no is mandatory or the response is a zip archive.
  • Responses are large — one statewide station query is ~750 KB. Every tool caps

Quick Start

Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "water-quality-portal": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/water-quality-portal/mcp"
    }
  }
}

What this endpoint actually serves

tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/water-quality-portal/mcp returns the tools in the table above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — askpipeworx, discovertools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and is the authoritative answer for a given day.

This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth, connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.

Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pipeworx": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1679+ data sources. The only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx reaches all of them from either one.

No MCP client? Call it over HTTP

curl -X POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/wqp_search_sites \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"statecode":"US:06","countycode":"US:06:081","characteristicName":"Nitrate","limit":5}'

No account needed for the first calls. Inspect any tool: GET https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/wqpsearchsites. Find one: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs with {"query":"..."}.

Standalone (no gateway account)

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Water Quality Portal: common questions

Is Water Quality Portal MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (73/100). Read the Water Quality Portal safety report
How do I install Water Quality Portal?
It runs remotely at gateway.pipeworx.io. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Water Quality Portal need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for PIPEWORX_API_KEY.
Is Water Quality Portal maintained?
The last commit was 40 days ago (2026-09-25). The latest release is v0.2.0.
Is Water Quality Portal up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
How does Water Quality Portal compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 73/100 (higher than 39% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 254 ms (faster than 55% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.

More from pipeworx-io →