MCP.Market

Washington Code MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by pipeworx-io·io.github.pipeworx-io/washington-code·v0.2.0

Washington state law: the Revised Code of Washington (RCW, statutes), the Washington…

B77/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B77/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
Growing

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Washington Code yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Washington Code tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Washington Code compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
77/100
higher than 50% of 48,255 servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
253 ms
faster than 55% of 30,031 servers

Release history: 5 versions in the registry since 2026-09-16, latest 2026-10-29, typically one every 11 days.

Install Washington Code in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http washington-code https://gateway.pipeworx.io/washington-code/mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Washington Code repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Washington Code — Revised Code of Washington by citation

Give it 9A.32.030, get back murder in the first degree. Keyless.

Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1576+ live data sources.

The best miss signal of the state packs

Washington's page names its own failure: a bad citation renders a panel with the id pnlCitationNotFound. It still answers HTTP 200 — every state source does — but the markup admits the miss rather than leaving it to be inferred.

This pack keys on that panel rather than on the absence of content, which is strictly safer: an absence-based check silently starts reporting "no such statute" for real ones if the layout ever moves the content.

Tool

warcwsection({section: "9A.32.030"}) → statutory text and heading. Accepts RCW 46.61.502 too — the prefix is stripped.

Caveats

RCW numbers are not contiguous; repealed and recodified sections are normal.

Data source

Washington State Legislature (app.leg.wa.gov). Washington statutes are public record.

Quick Start

Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "washington-code": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/washington-code/mcp"
    }
  }
}

What this endpoint actually serves

tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/washington-code/mcp returns the tools in the table above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — askpipeworx, discovertools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and is the authoritative answer for a given day.

This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth, connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.

Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pipeworx": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1576+ data sources. The only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx reaches all of them from either one.

No MCP client? Call it over HTTP

curl -X POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/wa_rcw_section \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"section":"9A.32.030"}'

No account needed for the first calls. Inspect any tool: GET https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/warcwsection. Find one: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs with {"query":"..."}.

Standalone (no gateway account)

This package also runs as a local stdio MCP server — no Pipeworx account, no gateway round-trip:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "washington-code": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-washington-code"]
    }
  }
}

Or run it directly to confirm it starts:

npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-washington-code

It speaks MCP over stdin/stdout and answers initialize/tools/list/tools/call for only this pack's tools — none of the shared meta-tools the gateway connection above adds. Same source, same tools, no ask_pipeworx routing.

Using with ask_pipeworx

Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:

ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Washington Code data" })

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Washington Code: common questions

Is Washington Code MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (77/100). Read the Washington Code safety report
How do I install Washington Code?
It runs remotely at gateway.pipeworx.io. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Washington Code need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for PIPEWORX_API_KEY.
Is Washington Code maintained?
The last commit was 38 days ago (2026-09-26). The latest release is v0.2.0.
Is Washington Code up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
What can I use instead of Washington Code?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Korean Law MCP server.
How does Washington Code compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 77/100 (higher than 50% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 253 ms (faster than 55% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Washington Code

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Korean Law MCP
    Korean law: statutes, precedents, ordinances, treaties and citation verification (법제처 API).
    A

More from pipeworx-io →