MCP.Market

Colorado Code MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by pipeworx-io·io.github.pipeworx-io/colorado-code·v0.2.1

Colorado Revised Statutes — state statutes by citation, topic, and title.

B77/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B77/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
Growing

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Colorado Code yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Colorado Code tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Colorado Code compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
77/100
higher than 50% of 48,255 servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
1,528 ms
faster than 5% of 30,031 servers

Release history: 5 versions in the registry since 2026-10-07, latest 2026-10-31, typically one every 5 days.

Install Colorado Code in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http colorado-code https://gateway.pipeworx.io/colorado-code/mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Colorado Code repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Colorado Code — Colorado Revised Statutes by citation, topic, and title

Keyless. "C.R.S. 18-3-102" returns murder in the first degree.

Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1704+ live data sources. This is an independent, unofficial integration — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or published by the upstream provider.

The official site redirects into a wall; a second official route does not

leg.colorado.gov's "C.R.S. Online" link does not host the text itself — it redirects into advance.lexis.com, a JS-rendered, cookie-session SPA whose own next step is a login-capture redirect (CaptureReturnUrl). That is the same class of wall this pack family declines (ASP.NET postback / anti-bot), and it has no stable per-citation URL to probe anyway.

The Office of Legislative Legal Services separately publishes the whole C.R.S. as downloadable files, one per title, on its own plain file server — no login, no JS, keyless:

https://olls.info/crs/crs2026-title-18.htm         (current edition)
https://olls.info/crs-archive/CRS-2015-TITLE-18.htm (a historical edition)

Files are per title, citations are per section — and titles are BIG

A title file holds the whole title plus case-law annotations after every section (Title 18 alone is ~9.5MB), so the section is cut out of it bounded by the next section heading OR the start of the annotations, whichever comes first. Annotations are Lexis's editorial case-law commentary, not the statute, and are never returned — only the statutory text, the Source: amendment history, and Cross references: (all public law).

The cut runs on the raw HTML, not the tag-stripped text, on purpose: a real section heading is the only place a citation is wrapped in NUM.. The per-article mini table-of-contents that precedes every article, and plain cross-references inside OTHER sections' annotations (a citation that happens to land at the start of a text line once tags are stripped), both repeat the same number unbolded — textually indistinguishable from a heading after stripping, never bold in the source.

Three file formats across 27 years of archive

Checked against Title 18 (old enough to exist in every edition):

2025 is declined explicitly (editionformatunsupported) rather than risk a silently wrong parse for one edition out of twenty-seven — almost certainly a one-year migration artifact between the other two generators. If a future year changes format again, costatute will start answering sectionnot_found for a title that exists; the same risk every sibling state pack already takes on the current year alone, just extended here across 25 archived years too.

Topic search is a nearby-heading window, not full hierarchy awareness

co_search runs against the ~18MB General Index (crs2026-index.htm), which is a nested tree — a topic heading followed by indented sub-entries that do not repeat the heading word. Matching only a result line misses that structure, so each query word is matched within a small window of the lines immediately preceding a citation-bearing entry. This works well for short topics (1-3 words: "landlord", "security deposit", "concealed handgun") and gets noisier on long compound phrases, which is why the tool description says so.

The four capabilities

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Colorado Code: common questions

Is Colorado Code MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (77/100). Read the Colorado Code safety report
How do I install Colorado Code?
It runs remotely at gateway.pipeworx.io. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Colorado Code need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for PIPEWORX_API_KEY.
Is Colorado Code maintained?
The last commit was 28 days ago (2026-10-07). The latest release is v0.2.1.
Is Colorado Code up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
What can I use instead of Colorado Code?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Korean Law MCP server.
How does Colorado Code compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 77/100 (higher than 50% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 1,528 ms (faster than 5% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Colorado Code

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Korean Law MCP
    Korean law: statutes, precedents, ordinances, treaties and citation verification (법제처 API).
    A

More from pipeworx-io →