
Codex Gsfa MCP server
online · 100% uptimeCodex GSFA — the FAO/WHO General Standard for Food Additives (CXS 192-1995).
not scanned yet
0 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Codex Gsfa yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Codex Gsfa tools
Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.
How Codex Gsfa compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 73/100
- higher than 39% of 48,255 servers
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
- Response time
- 153 ms
- faster than 72% of 30,031 servers
Release history: 5 versions in the registry since 2026-09-14, latest 2026-10-31, typically one every 11 days.
Install Codex Gsfa in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add --transport http codex-gsfa https://gateway.pipeworx.io/codex-gsfa/mcp
What the publisher says
From the Codex Gsfa repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
@pipeworx/codex-gsfa
The FAO/WHO Codex General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA, CXS 192-1995) — which food additives may be used in which foods, at what maximum level, under which conditions.
Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1576+ live data sources.
Tools
Two kinds of permission
GSFA grants use in two structurally different ways, and every provision returned says which one it came from:
level, either numeric (10,000 mg/kg) or GMP, usually conditioned by numbered notes.
- Table 1 & 2 (provisiontable: "table12") — a specific maximum use
good manufacturing practice with no numeric limit.
- Table 3 (provision_table: "table3") — the additive is permitted under
For methyl cellulose that is 17 Table 1/2 provisions against 61 Table 3 ones. Treating them as one thing either invents limits the standard does not set or hides most of where an additive is actually allowed.
Subcategory inheritance
A GSFA provision applies to the food category named and all of its subcategories — a provision on 01.4 also governs 01.4.4. Lookups walk up the numbering and report inheritedfromparent plus matchedfoodcategory, because "permitted at this level for this exact food" and "permitted because its parent category is" are different answers.
permitted: false means the standard lists no provision. That is not the same as an explicit prohibition, and the response says so rather than implying a ban.
Notes are part of the answer
Provisions are frequently qualified by numbered notes — "for use in ready-to-drink products only", "as sulphur dioxide", "on the fat basis" — and a maximum level is not fully specified without them. 2,590 of 15,377 provisions carry one.
Note text is inlined on every provision (notes: [{id, text}]), not left as a bare id, because an id with no text invites a caller to read the level and stop. gsfa_notes resolves ids directly or searches note wording.
The text is scraped from the note icon's tooltip on each additive page, so it carries the same Codex session as the additive it qualifies. All 468 cited note ids resolve.
Auth
None. The dataset ships inside the pack.
Freshness
Every additive result carries cacsession, cacyear, and snapshotdate. Records come from archived snapshots of GSFA Online, so individual additives can lag the newest Codex session — gsfacoverage reports which sessions are present and which additive ids could not be retrieved at all (entries whose every archived snapshot is one of FAO's own error pages).
Regenerate with:
node --experimental-strip-types scripts/ingest-gsfa.tsData sources
Cloudflare managed challenge; we read Internet Archive snapshots instead — see docs/codex-gsfa-plan.md for the route and the freshness plan)
- Codex GSFA Online — (FAO fronts this with a
data —
- Codex Alimentarius CXS 192-1995 —
- JECFA specifications and evaluations, which GSFA links to for toxicological
Quick Start
Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Grade history
- 2026-10-03downgradeA → Bscore 73
- 2026-09-19restoreB → Ascore 87
Codex Gsfa: common questions
- Is Codex Gsfa MCP server safe?
- Mostly: it is graded B (73/100). Read the Codex Gsfa safety report
- How do I install Codex Gsfa?
- It runs remotely at gateway.pipeworx.io. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
- Does Codex Gsfa need an API key?
- Yes. The registry entry asks for
PIPEWORX_API_KEY. - Is Codex Gsfa maintained?
- The last commit was 40 days ago (2026-09-24). The latest release is v0.2.1.
- Is Codex Gsfa up?
- 100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
- How does Codex Gsfa compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 73/100 (higher than 39% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 153 ms (faster than 72% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.