MCP.Market

Bounceban MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by pipeworx-io·io.github.pipeworx-io/bounceban·v0.2.1

BounceBan MCP — wraps the BounceBan email-verification API (bounceban.com)

B77/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B77/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
Growing

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Bounceban yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Bounceban tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Bounceban compares

Against every graded Email MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
77/100
higher than 50% of 916 Email servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote Email server answers 100%
Response time
240 ms
faster than 60% of 609 Email servers

Release history: 4 versions in the registry since 2026-10-08, latest 2026-10-31, typically one every 5 days.

Install Bounceban in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http bounceban https://gateway.pipeworx.io/bounceban/mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Bounceban repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

@pipeworx/bounceban

Verify a single email address via BounceBan's waterfall-tuned endpoint (bounceban.com), including catch-all detection. Part of enrich-waterfall's enrichverifyemail ordered verifiers (fleet #2860).

Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1743+ live data sources. This is an independent, unofficial integration — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or published by the upstream provider.

Tools

disposable/role/free flags.

  • bouncebanverify(email, apiKey) — status/result, explicit catch_all,

Auth

BYO only. Pass your BounceBan API key as apiKey (header Authorization, no Bearer prefix**). Find your key at https://bounceban.com/app/api/settings. No platform key (D4).

Data sources

waterfall-specific host, built to block synchronously (up to 80s) for a definitive result rather than handing back a task to poll. BounceBan also publishes a standard api.bounceban.com host for the same verb; this pack deliberately uses the waterfall one since that is the shape enrichverifyemail needs.

  • https://api-waterfall.bounceban.com/v1/verify/single — BounceBan's

Verification notes (fleet #2860, 2026-10-08, no vendor key held)

header: HTTP 401 {"error":"Authorization header is required"}. An invalid key: HTTP 401 {"msg":"Authorization information is missing or invalid."}. Two different bodies for two different failures confirms the header is read, not just a blanket 401. This pack's code checks both error and msg fields when surfacing the reason.

  • Edge-probed the EXACT host/path this pack calls. No Authorization

waterfall-integration guide) — this pack surfaces that as a named, distinct error ("verification timed out server-side") rather than letting it fall through to a generic HTTP-error path, since a caller retrying or moving to the next verifier needs to know it was a timeout, not a bad email or a bad key.

  • BounceBan documents a 408 for a timed-out verification (its own

from BounceBan's public no-code-integration docs and GitHub skill-email-verification description, not a confirmed live success payload — we hold no BounceBan key. The parser accepts either iscatchall/catch_all as a boolean, or falls back to checking whether the status string itself contains "catch" if neither field is present.

  • Response field names (status/result, iscatchall) are inferred

the main verdict (status vs result); the full enumeration of status values beyond "catch-all" and the obvious valid/invalid.

  • Not verified (no key held): the exact field name BounceBan uses for

Quick Start

Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bounceban": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/bounceban/mcp"
    }
  }
}

What this endpoint actually serves

tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/bounceban/mcp returns the tools in the table above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — askpipeworx, discovertools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and is the authoritative answer for a given day.

This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth, connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.

Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Bounceban: common questions

Is Bounceban MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (77/100). Read the Bounceban safety report
How do I install Bounceban?
It runs remotely at gateway.pipeworx.io. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Bounceban need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for PIPEWORX_API_KEY.
Is Bounceban maintained?
The last commit was 26 days ago (2026-10-08). The latest release is v0.2.1.
Is Bounceban up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
What can I use instead of Bounceban?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Agenticmail MCP server, Tomba MCP Server and Forward Email MCP server.
How does Bounceban compare with other Email MCP servers?
safety score 77/100 (higher than 50% of 916 Email servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote Email server answers 100%); response time 240 ms (faster than 60% of 609 Email servers). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Bounceban

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Agenticmail
    Real email and SMS for AI agents — send mail, receive verification codes, drive a real inbox.
    B
  • Tomba MCP Server
    MCP server for Tomba email finder, verification, and contact enrichment API
    A
  • Forward Email
    Privacy-focused email: domains, DNS verification, aliases, SMTP sending, mailboxes and calendars.
    A
  • smails
    Free disposable email for AI agents: a throwaway inbox to read verification codes over MCP.
    B
  • MX Probe
    Email verification for AI agents: send, hold or kill with the reason. Signup and credits by API.
    B

More from pipeworx-io →