MCP.Market

Lolipop MCP Server

online · 100% uptime
by pepabo·io.github.pepabo/lolipop-mcp·v0.1.0

Official remote MCP server for Lolipop Rental Server by GMO Pepabo.

A93/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A93/100

full report

Adoption
New

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Lolipop MCP Server yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Lolipop MCP Server tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-25 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1211ms (auth required)20/20
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
  • Maintenancelast push 53 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10
Overall 93/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Lolipop MCP Server compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
93/100
higher than 96% of 48,255 servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
1,534 ms
faster than 5% of 30,031 servers

Install Lolipop MCP Server in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http lolipop-mcp https://lolipop.jp/api/v1/mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Lolipop MCP Server repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Lolipop MCP Server

日本語版 README はこちら / Japanese README

The official remote Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Lolipop Rental Server — a shared web hosting service operated by GMO Pepabo, Inc.

Manage domains, subdomains, free SSL certificates, and WordPress installations — all through natural language conversations with AI assistants.

Endpoint

https://lolipop.jp/api/v1/mcp

Transport: Streamable HTTP. Authentication: Personal Access Token (PAT) via the Authorization: Bearer header.

Features

  • Domain management — add, list, update (public folder), and remove custom domains
  • Subdomain management — add, list, and remove subdomains
  • SSL — list free SSL certificates and request issuance (Let's Encrypt)
  • WordPress — list installations and run a one-click install
  • Account info — retrieve the authenticated API key's account information (plan, server, rate limit)

Pricing: MCP server access is free. A valid Lolipop Rental Server contract is required.

Authentication

The Lolipop MCP server authenticates with a Personal Access Token (PAT), issued from the Lolipop user panel.

  1. Sign in to the Lolipop user panel and issue an API key (PAT). Copy the token (lppat...).
  2. Register the endpoint URL together with the Authorization: Bearer header in your MCP client (see Quick Start below).

Scopes are selected at issuance time (domains:read / domains:write / ssl:read / ssl:write / wordpress:read / wordpress:write). Requests exceeding the token's scope return 403 insufficient_scope.

Note: claude.ai (the web app's custom connectors) currently requires OAuth and cannot pass a static Authorization header, so it is not supported at this time. Use a client that supports custom headers (Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex), or the mcp-remote stdio bridge below.

Quick Start

Keep your PAT out of committed files and shell history. Store it in an environment variable (e.g. LOLIPOPPAT) and reference it, rather than pasting the raw token into a config file or a command line. The examples below use ${LOLIPOPPAT}.

export LOLIPOP_PAT="lp_pat_..."   # your issued token

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http lolipop https://lolipop.jp/api/v1/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer ${LOLIPOP_PAT}"

Claude Code MCP docs

Cursor

Add to .cursor/mcp.json. Cursor expands ${env:VAR} references, so the raw token stays in your environment, not the file:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lolipop": {
      "url": "https://lolipop.jp/api/v1/mcp",
      "headers": {
        "Authorization": "Bearer ${env:LOLIPOP_PAT}"
      }
    }
  }
}

Gemini CLI

Add to ~/.gemini/settings.json. Gemini CLI expands $VAR / ${VAR} references from the environment:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lolipop": {
      "httpUrl": "https://lolipop.jp/api/v1/mcp",
      "headers": {
        "Authorization": "Bearer ${LOLIPOP_PAT}"
      }
    }
  }
}

See the Gemini CLI MCP server documentation for details.

OpenAI Codex CLI

Codex supports remote MCP servers and can read the token from an environment variable via bearertokenenv_var. Configure https://lolipop.jp/api/v1/mcp per the Codex MCP documentation:

[mcp_servers.lolipop]
url = "https://lolipop.jp/api/v1/mcp"
bearer_token_env_var = "LOLIPOP_PAT"

Local stdio bridge (for clients without custom-header support)

Use mcp-remote to bridge a stdio-only client to the remote endpoint. Reference the token via environment variable so it does not appear in the config file:

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Lolipop MCP Server: common questions

Is Lolipop MCP Server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (93/100). Read the Lolipop MCP Server safety report
How do I install Lolipop MCP Server?
It runs remotely at lolipop.jp. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Lolipop MCP Server need an API key?
No key to paste: it signs you in with OAuth when your client connects.
Is Lolipop MCP Server maintained?
The last commit was 92 days ago (2026-08-04). The latest release is v0.1.0.
Is Lolipop MCP Server up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
How does Lolipop MCP Server compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 93/100 (higher than 96% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 1,534 ms (faster than 5% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.

More from pepabo →