Legalithm MCP server
io.github.PedramMadani/legalithm-mcp-server·v0.2.1EU AI Act risk classification, obligations and Article 50 disclosures. Offline, no API key.
0 stars42 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Legalithm yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Legalithm tools (4)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsRead from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.
check_recordFetch a published Legalithm Trust Center compliance record by org slug. Online (reads the public API).
classifyClassify an AI use case under the EU AI Act \u2014 risk tier + cited rationale. Offline; checked against Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, not legal advice.
explain_obligationList the EU AI Act obligations for a role + risk tier, each with its Article citation. Offline.
generate_disclosureGenerate an Article 50 transparency disclosure snippet (chatbot / genai-content / deepfake / emotion), EN or DE. Offline.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-24 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 20 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ4/10
How Legalithm compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 86/100
- higher than 72% of 48,255 servers
- Tools
- 4
- the typical server has 7
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Downloads a week
- 42
- more than 34% of 12,191 servers with a package
What its tools let an agent do: 3 read · 1 create
Install Legalithm in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
Runs npx -y legalithm-mcp-server on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.
claude mcp add legalithm-mcp-server -- npx -y legalithm-mcp-server
What the publisher says
From the Legalithm repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
Legalithm — EU AI Act compliance in your coding loop
Shipping an AI feature to EU users? Article 50 transparency duties have applied since 2 August 2026. Content marking for systems placed before that date is due 2 December 2026, and Annex III high-risk obligations follow on 2 December 2027. Catch it where you code, in seconds.
This image is AI-generated, and it is marked as such with our own tool: legalithm mark --watermark added a C2PA content credential and a pixel watermark, which is what Article 50(2) asks for. Download it and run legalithm verify on it. The credential is signed with the CLI's test certificate, so it is valid but not trust-listed.
Quickstart
Install the offline server in your editor. No API key, and nothing leaves your machine.
claude plugin marketplace add legalithm-org/legalithm
claude plugin install legalithm@legalithmCodex:
codex plugin marketplace add legalithm-org/legalithm
codex plugin add legalithm@legalithmCursor: use the Add to Cursor badge above.
Then ask your agent "does the EU AI Act apply to this feature, and what tier?"
What comes back (real output, CV screening as the provider)
{
"risk": "high",
"confidence": "high",
"rationale": "This AI system is classified as high-risk under Article 6(2) as it falls into the category of Employment, Workers Management and Access to Self-employment as specified in Annex III...",
"citations": [
{
"article": "6(2)",
"annex": "III",
"label": "Article 6(2) & Annex III - High-Risk AI Systems",
"url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L_202401689#article-6",
"asOf": "2026-08-03",
"appliesFrom": "2027-12-02"
}
],
"matchedRules": ["high_risk_employment", "high_risk_domain_selected"],
"applicableDeadline": "2027-12-02",
"obligationsHint": {
"count": 10,
"topTitles": [
"Quality Management System (Article 17)",
"Data Governance (Article 10)",
"Technical Documentation (Article 11)",
"Human Oversight (Article 14)"
]
},
"confidenceScore": 0.72,
"reviewRequired": false
}Note matchedRules, asOf and confidenceScore. You can see which rule fired, how old the corpus is, and how sure the engine was. Below the abstention threshold it sets reviewRequired and tells you to get a human instead of guessing.
Content marking for Article 50(2), also no key:
npm i -g legalithm
legalithm mark ./out.png --watermark # writes out.signed.png
legalithm verify ./out.signed.png # detect both layersInstall it rather than using npx for these two: C2PA and the watermark come from c2pa-node and sharp, which are optional native dependencies that npx does not reliably fetch. Without them mark warns and marks nothing. Everything else in this README works fine under npx.
The compliance record (needs a free key)
npx legalithm setup # wires hooks, editor rule and MCP config
npx legalithm init # writes a dated, cited compliance/legalithm.json
npx legalithm check # re-verify; non-zero exit on drift (for CI)init and check talk to the hosted record service, so they need a free API key. Everything above this line does not.
Three surfaces
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Legalithm: common questions
- Is Legalithm MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (86/100). Read the Legalithm safety report
- How do I install Legalithm?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Legalithm need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Legalithm maintained?
- The last commit was 62 days ago (2026-09-03). The latest release is v0.2.1.
- How does Legalithm compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 86/100 (higher than 72% of 48,255 servers); tools 4 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.