Rash MCP server
Transpile Rust code to POSIX-compliant shell scripts with formal correctness guarantees
F25/100grade F
Adoption
Not measured yet
Usage numbers are collected on the next scan
Blocked at the gateway.Blocked at the gateway. A critical finding or a dead endpoint.
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Rash yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Rash tools
No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-01 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityno auth information5/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 25/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
How Rash compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 25/100
- higher than 4% of 48,255 servers
Install Rash in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.
Rash: common questions
- Is Rash MCP server safe?
- No: it is graded F and blocked at the gateway (25/100). Read the Rash safety report
- Does Rash need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Rash maintained?
- The latest release is v0.1.0.