MCP.Market

prismAId MCP server

by open-and-sustainable·io.github.open-and-sustainable/prismaid-mcp·v0.17.1·31 stars

MCP server for prismAId AI-assisted systematic reviews and protocol conformance checking.

B83/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B83/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

31 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed prismAId MCP yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

prismAId MCP tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanpackage could not be scannedn/a
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 54 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How prismAId MCP compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
83/100
higher than 65% of 48,255 servers
GitHub stars
31
more than 92% of 28,688 servers

Install prismAId MCP in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add prismaid-mcp -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/open-and-sustainable/prismaid-mcp:0.17.1
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the prismAId MCP repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

prismAId

Open Science AI Tools for Systematic, Protocol-Based Literature Reviews

prismAId offers a suite of tools using generative AI models to streamline systematic reviews of scientific literature.

It provides simple-to-use, efficient, and replicable methods for screening and analyzing research papers with no coding skills required.

Toolkit Overview

prismAId offers a comprehensive set of tools for systematic literature reviews:

Core Tools

  1. Screening - Filter and tag manuscripts to identify items for exclusion
  2. Download - Download papers from Zotero collections or from URL lists
  3. Convert - Convert files (PDF, DOCX, HTML) to plain text for analysis
  4. Review - Process systematic literature reviews based on TOML configurations
  5. RevAIse documentation support - Optionally document review stages as RevAIse review records

Workflow

Our tools support a comprehensive systematic review workflow following the standard sequence: Search → Screen → Download → Convert → Review. RevAIse support can document Zotero download, screening, and review/extraction stages in one cumulative review record.

Access Methods

  • AI agents via the MCP server - A main entry point: connect an AI assistant to the prismAId MCP server and drive every tool in conversation
  • Command Line Interface - For users who prefer terminal-based workflows
  • Web Initializer - A browser-based setup tool for configuring reviews
  • Programming Libraries - API access through multiple languages:
  • Go (native implementation)
  • Python package
  • R package
  • Julia package

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Grade history

  • 2026-11-02downgradeA → Bscore 83

prismAId MCP: common questions

Is prismAId MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (83/100). Read the prismAId MCP safety report
How do I install prismAId MCP?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does prismAId MCP need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is prismAId MCP maintained?
The last commit was 56 days ago (2026-09-09). The latest release is v0.17.1.
How does prismAId MCP compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 83/100 (higher than 65% of 48,255 servers); github stars 31 (more than 92% of 28,688 servers). Full comparison.