MCP.Market

Checker MCP server

by oksigenia.com·com.oksigenia/checker-mcp·v0.1.1

Domain security & privacy checker as an MCP server. 17 live checks, 0-100 score, local-first.

B82/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B82/100

full report

Adoption
New

0 stars34 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Checker yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Checker tools (3, 1 write)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • check_domainwrite action

    Run the Oksigenia Checker against a domain and return a scored security report from real live checks (SSL/TLS, email authentication, DNS & infrastructure, web security). Accepts a bare domain or a URL. Optionally restrict to specific categories.

  • explain_check

    Given a check id (see list_checks), explain what it verifies, why it matters, and how to remediate a failure.

  • list_checks

    List every check the Oksigenia Checker performs, grouped by category, with the reason each one matters. Useful to know what check ids exist.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-25 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan6 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 65 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ4/10
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Checker compares

Against every graded Security MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
82/100
higher than 66% of 915 Security servers
Tools
3
the typical Security server has 6
Tools that change things
33%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week
34
more than 22% of 248 Security servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 2 read · 1 change

Install Checker in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

Runs npx -y @oksigenia/checker-mcp on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add checker-mcp -- npx -y @oksigenia/checker-mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Checker repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

@oksigenia/checker-mcp

A domain security and privacy checker exposed as an MCP server. It runs entirely on your machine, makes no telemetry calls, and resolves DNS through Cloudflare DoH instead of Google.

Ask any MCP client to scan a domain and get back a scored report covering the certificate, email authentication, DNS and infrastructure, and web security headers, with a plain remediation for anything that fails.

Why it's different

  • Local-first. The server runs over stdio and does its own DNS-over-HTTPS, HTTP, RDAP and TLS lookups. The only network traffic is the checks themselves.
  • Zero telemetry. No analytics, no phone-home, no third-party scoring service in the loop.
  • Privacy by default. DNS goes to Cloudflare DoH rather than Google, and the reputation check uses Cloudflare's malware/phishing resolver.
  • Free software. Licensed GPL-3.0-or-later. Read it, run it, change it, self-host it.

Tools

The server exposes three tools.

check_domain

Scan a domain or URL and return a scored report from real live checks.

// arguments
{
  "domain": "example.com",          // bare domain or full URL
  "categories": ["ssl", "email"],   // optional subset; defaults to all
  "format": "report",               // "report" (default) or "json"
  "lang": "en"                      // "es" or "en"
}

list_checks

List every check grouped by category, with the reason each one matters.

{ "lang": "en" }

explain_check

Explain a single check by id, why it matters, and how to remediate a failure.

{ "check_id": "dmarc", "lang": "en" }

Checks

Seventeen checks across four categories, weighted to a 0-100 score.

Run listchecks for the full descriptions, or explaincheck for one at a time.

Install

Run it straight from npm with npx:

npx @oksigenia/checker-mcp

Register it with Claude Code:

claude mcp add oksigenia-checker -- npx -y @oksigenia/checker-mcp

Or add it to any MCP client config (works in Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or any MCP client):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "oksigenia-checker": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@oksigenia/checker-mcp"],
      "env": { "OKSIGENIA_LANG": "en" }
    }
  }
}

Then ask: "Check the security of example.com" or "Explain the dmarc check."

Run with Docker

Build and run it as a container. It speaks MCP over stdio, so run it attached to your client's stdin/stdout (-i), not on a port.

docker build -t oksigenia-checker-mcp .
docker run --rm -i oksigenia-checker-mcp

Languages

Reports render in Spanish and English. Set the default with OKSIGENIA_LANG (es or en), or pass lang on any tool call. It defaults to English.

Privacy

The only thing that leaves your machine is the domain name you scan, sent to:

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Checker: common questions

Is Checker MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (82/100). Read the Checker safety report
How do I install Checker?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Checker need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Checker maintained?
The last commit was 105 days ago (2026-07-22). The latest release is v0.1.1.
What can I use instead of Checker?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Safeinstall MCP server, Reversecore MCP server and CodeInspectus MCP server.
How does Checker compare with other Security MCP servers?
safety score 82/100 (higher than 66% of 915 Security servers); tools 3 (the typical Security server has 6); tools that change things 33% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Checker

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Safeinstall
    Local-first supply-chain security gate for npm/pnpm/bun: typosquat, release age, provenance checks
    A
  • Reversecore MCP
    Security-first MCP server for reverse engineering, malware analysis, forensics, and SAST.
    B
  • CodeInspectus
    Local-first MCP security scanner and CLI for AI-generated applications.
    C
  • MCPProxy
    Local-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savings
    B
  • Prodcheck
    4,685 pre-production checks: security, performance, scale, integrations, post-launch, people.
    A