MCP.Market

Liquipedia MCP server

by mrfentmen·io.github.mrfentmen/liquipedia-mcp·v1.0.0

Keyless Liquipedia esports wiki: search, articles, changes, categories, backlinks.

A89/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A89/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

0 stars92 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Liquipedia yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Liquipedia tools (5)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • get_backlinks

    Pages linking to a Liquipedia page: related players, teams, events.

  • get_category_members

    List pages in a Liquipedia category, e.g. tournament or team categories.

  • get_page

    Read a Liquipedia page as plain text: player bios, team rosters, tournament results.

  • get_recent_changes

    Recent edits on a Liquipedia wiki: roster moves, results updates.

  • search_pages

    Search a Liquipedia game wiki for pages: players, teams, tournaments.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-28 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan7 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Overall 89/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Liquipedia compares

Against every graded Web search MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
89/100
higher than 85% of 3,470 Web search servers
Tools
5
the typical Web search server has 5
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week
92
more than 55% of 827 Web search servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 5 read

Install Liquipedia in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

Runs npx -y liquipedia-mcp on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add liquipedia-mcp -- npx -y liquipedia-mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Liquipedia repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

awesome-servers

One repo for three families of servers, each subtree keeping its own layout and tooling so it can still be built, run and published on its own.

Most servers read public data with no key of their own; the ones wrapping a vendor API take that vendor's key. Nothing in this repo asks a caller to pay. On 2026-10-17 the licence machinery was removed for good: the per-tool src/license.ts gates are gone from the MCP servers, and the A2A and ACP trees no longer carry the hosted licence-gateway half — the skills that used it now answer with an explicit not-implemented stub. Nothing here asks a caller to pay, and nothing they run is refused with a buy link.

Nothing here is generated: each subtree's README says what its servers read, and every server has its own unit tests (mcp/servers//tests, acp/agents//tests, a2a/servers//tests) plus a live smoke check (tools/smoke.py, a2a/tools/smokeall.py).

Novel and original

Nearly all of this is first-of-its-kind work, not a port of an existing catalogue. Before each server or agent was built, it was checked against the official tool lists (the MCP registries, agentclientprotocol.com's agent list and registry) and a live GitHub search for the same domain, and the research logs record what was found and why it still counted as missing — see mcp/MISSING.md, acp/MISSING.md and a2a/docs/. Highlights:

published/; mcp/MISSING.md documents the check that preceded every build: what was searched, what was skipped and why the domain still counted as uncovered.

  • The MCP side holds TypeScript servers, one npm package each, and 1039 published packages under

official list was a coding agent. These 79 Python agents are the first non-coding ACP agents, and several use protocol surfaces no other agent uses in production (session/requestpermission for dataset reads, fs/writetextfile for a briefing file, session/cancel for a conditional watch, image content blocks, a live SSE push feed), each proved-unused in the wild by search at build time. Two more firsts carry their own proof: the orchestrator is an agent whose feeds are agents* — it spawns sibling repo agents as real ACP child processes and merges their answers — and the nyc pack is the first multi-agency city surface.

  • On the ACP side there were zero domain agents before this repo — every agent on the

feed probed live, with its date, what it answered and whether it still works. The published site renders that table at .

  • acp/MISSING.md doubles as the public-feed atlas: every keyless

dataset, answer honestly about what the feed did and did not say, and keep the whole thing small, tested and self-contained.

  • The pattern across all three subtrees is the same thesis: wrap one real, keyless public

Publishing

  • MCP servers publish from mcp/servers/ (its own package.json, version and README).
  • ACP and A2A servers are repo-run today (Python, no packaging step).

Built on top of it

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Liquipedia: common questions

Is Liquipedia MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (89/100). Read the Liquipedia safety report
How do I install Liquipedia?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Liquipedia need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Liquipedia maintained?
The last commit was 7 days ago (2026-10-28). The latest release is v1.0.0.
What can I use instead of Liquipedia?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Pubmed MCP server.
How does Liquipedia compare with other Web search MCP servers?
safety score 89/100 (higher than 85% of 3,470 Web search servers); tools 5 (the typical Web search server has 5); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Liquipedia

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Pubmed
    Search PubMed/Europe PMC, fetch articles and full text (PMC/EPMC/Unpaywall), citations, MeSH terms.
    A

More from mrfentmen →