Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared MCP server
online · 100% uptimeChatGPT reports 900M weekly users (Feb 2026). Gemini reports 950M monthly (Jul 2026), 2.4× its.
Little public usage data yet
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared tools (3)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsget_chart_dataFreeReturns one chart from the Chart of the Day archive: the data table behind it (rows as published), claim, takeaway, note and the sources it cites. Look up by slug or title. Data is as published on the chart page; follow source_urls for the original data.
get_venture_chart_of_the_dayFreeReturns the most recent charts from Mode VC's Chart of the Day archive (one new chart per day, mostly AI model, adoption, developer-package and pricing data), newest first, each with its claim, takeaway, URL and cited sources.
search_chartsFreeSearches every chart in the Mode VC Chart of the Day archive by keyword over title, claim, takeaway and keywords. Returns claims, takeaways, canonical URLs, markdown endpoints and cited sources. The archive grows by one chart a day; the response states its current size.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-28 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 174ms20/20
- Tool poisoning3 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityendpoint served from the registry-verified namespace domain8/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
How Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 45% of 48,273 servers
- Tools
- 3
- the typical server has 7
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
- Response time
- 5 ms
- faster than 99% of 30,037 servers
What its tools let an agent do: 3 read
Install Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add --transport http chart-chatgpt-vs-gemini-vs-meta-ai-users https://modevc.com/api/mcp/chart-chatgpt-vs-gemini-vs-meta-ai-users
Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared: common questions
- Is Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared MCP server safe?
- Mostly: it is graded B (75/100). Read the Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared safety report
- How do I install Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared?
- It runs remotely at modevc.com. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
- Does Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared maintained?
- The latest release is v2.0.2.
- Is Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared up?
- 100% of our last 25 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
- How does Mode VC Chart: ChatGPT vs. Gemini vs. Meta AI: User Numbers Compared compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 75/100 (higher than 45% of 48,273 servers); tools 3 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.