Sendermap MCP server
io.github.marmot7775/sendermap·v0.1.13Maps every service that sends email as a domain, with the public record behind each one.
not scanned yet
0 stars69 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Sendermap yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Sendermap tools
No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.
How Sendermap compares
Against every graded Email MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 92/100
- higher than 90% of 916 Email servers
- Downloads a week
- 69
- more than 49% of 235 Email servers with a package
Release history: 8 versions in the registry since 2026-10-15, latest 2026-11-03, typically one every 1 day.
Install Sendermap in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add sendermap -- uvx sendermap
What the publisher says
From the Sendermap repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
Sendermap
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.marmot7775/sendermap -->
Type a domain, see every service that sends email as it, and the public evidence for each one.
Status: early release (0.1.1). The command-line tool works; the website is not hosted yet. Needs Python 3.12 or later.
What it shows
For any domain, Sendermap builds a map of the services that send or receive its mail: mailbox providers, marketing and transactional platforms, support desks, security gateways and the services that receive its reports. Each one comes with:
CNAME, verification token or report address that gave it away.
- The evidence, record by record: the SPF include, MX host, DKIM key, bounce or tracking
- How sure we are, in words, not a percentage:
- In use: mail for the domain is delivered there.
- Configured: set up to send as the domain.
- Likely: a signing key whose name points at the service.
- Account only: a trace of an account with nothing set up to send.
It looks beyond the main domain: brands often send from subdomains such as email., mg. or bounce., which a check of the main domain never sees. It also points out what needs attention: DKIM records that point at names that no longer exist, SPF records past the 10 lookup limit, revoked keys, and senders nobody can name. Raw IP ranges nobody can name are grouped by the network that announces them, so a dozen ranges from one provider read as one line.
Each DKIM key is shown with the tags that change what it does: t=y (testing, so verifiers treat mail signed with it as unsigned), t=s (strict), h= (hash algorithms), s= (service types) and k= (key type). A tag that weakens the key, such as testing mode or SHA-1 only, is raised as a finding. Each key also gets a fingerprint, fp and 16 hex characters, so the same key published at two selectors is easy to spot, and the map points it out when it is.
Checked and not there
The map also lists what it looked for and did not find, with the DNS answers that show it. Today that covers DKIM keys. Whether "not there" can be trusted depends on how the domain's DNS answers for a name that does not exist, so at each name Sendermap first asks for a selector nobody publishes and reads the answer as one of four classes:
not exist, no selector exists under it. The map checks only the few names the domain's SPF and MX point to, rather than its full list, and says so. If _domainkey exists but every name asked is missing, the map says selectors exist but none of the names it tried is one.
- Classic: the zone says "no such name". Answers can be trusted. If _domainkey itself does
the answer says nothing about what exists. The map asks its full list and claims no absence.
- None by rcode: the zone gives an empty answer for every missing name (compact denial), so
list.
- Wildcard: every name answers. The map ignores what the wildcard repeats and asks its full
checked.
- Unknown: the test lookup failed, so nothing is read from it, and the map lists it as not
How it works
Everything comes from public sources: DNS, certificate transparency logs, the domain's own website, and public records of who owns each network. Each finding is shown with the record that supports it, so you can check it yourself.
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Sendermap: common questions
- Is Sendermap MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (92/100). Read the Sendermap safety report
- How do I install Sendermap?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Sendermap need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Sendermap maintained?
- The last commit was 20 days ago (2026-10-15). The latest release is v0.1.13.
- What can I use instead of Sendermap?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Sendsoon MCP server, Qmailing MCP server and Mailkite MCP server.
- How does Sendermap compare with other Email MCP servers?
- safety score 92/100 (higher than 90% of 916 Email servers); downloads a week 69 (more than 49% of 235 Email servers with a package). Full comparison.
Alternatives to Sendermap
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- SendsoonSend email, look up public IP information, and convert files to Markdown through SendSoon.not reviewedGrowingB
QmailingAI agents read & send email, manage mailboxes, domains and webhooks via the QMailing API.not reviewedGrowingA- MailkiteSend email, manage domains, DNS, webhooks, templates, and inbound routing on MailKitenot reviewedGrowingA
- AgenticmailReal email and SMS for AI agents — send mail, receive verification codes, drive a real inbox.not reviewedEstablishedB
- ImapIMAP/SMTP MCP server to search, read, organize, send, reply & forward email for AI assistantsnot reviewedEstablishedA