Publication Cadence Tracker MCP server
How often a company publishes long-form work, and whether that rate is rising or falling.
0 stars84 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Publication Cadence Tracker yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Publication Cadence Tracker tools (1)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsRead from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.
track_publication_cadence
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ4/10
How Publication Cadence Tracker compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 77/100
- higher than 50% of 48,255 servers
- Tools
- 1
- the typical server has 7
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Downloads a week
- 84
- more than 59% of 12,191 servers with a package
What its tools let an agent do: 1 read
Release history: 3 versions in the registry since 2026-08-13, latest 2026-10-16, typically one every 54 days.
Install Publication Cadence Tracker in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
Runs npx -y @mambalabsdev/mcp-publication-cadence-tracker on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.
claude mcp add mcp-publication-cadence-tracker -- npx -y @mambalabsdev/mcp-publication-cadence-tracker
What the publisher says
From the Publication Cadence Tracker repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
Publication Cadence Tracker MCP Server
MCP server for the Mamba Labs Publication Cadence Tracker actor on Apify.
Give it a company domain. It tells your agent how much long-form work that company publishes per month, and whether that rate is rising or falling.
Tool
trackpublicationcadence
Returns a flat row per domain: postslast30d, postslast90d, postslast12m, avgpostspermonth, cadencetrend (accelerating, steady, declining, dormant, unknown), trendpctchange, mostrecentpostdate, dayssincelastpost, publicationurl, formatsdetected[], distinctauthorscount, discovery_method, confidence, and an evidence[] array of quotable strings.
Why the trend and not the count
Four pieces a month is unremarkable. Going from four to twelve in six months is a content operation outgrowing its staff. The comparison is stated rather than implied: the last 90 days against the prior 275 days, both normalized to posts per month, with accelerating and declining set at 25 percent either way.
This is editorial output volume, not changelog monitoring. A release feed is detected and rejected rather than counted as published work.
The number it refuses to give you
Publication dates come from the post pages, never from sitemap lastmod. Across 100 measured URL pairs, lastmod tracked the page's own dateModified and ran later than datePublished by a median of 151 to 1653 days on four of six sites. A cadence built on it would report a company that refreshed 200 old posts as a company that published 200 posts.
A page field can fail the same way, so it is checked against its own distribution and against the site's feed. When it fails, datesourcereliable comes back false and every count is nulled. Check that field before quoting a number.
Measured on nine live domains: a rate recovered on 5 of 6 publishers, 3 of 3 controls correctly returning nothing. The one miss is the guard refusing a site whose date field tracks edits.
trackpublicationcadence
What it actually measures
Not whether a company has a blog. How much it published, when, and whether the rate moved.
Finding the blog is most of the work, and it is where a naive version fails. The blog often lives on a different host from the apex and the apex sitemap never mentions it (blog.hubspot.com). A homepage sometimes advertises only a changelog feed while linking to the real blog repeatedly (about.gitlab.com). Paths are often locale prefixed, so /en-uk/ and /bg-bg/ fragment the archive into forty pieces. All three are handled, and publicationurl reports a locale-prefixed section as https://example.com//knowledge/.
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Publication Cadence Tracker: common questions
- Is Publication Cadence Tracker MCP server safe?
- Mostly: it is graded B (77/100). Read the Publication Cadence Tracker safety report
- How do I install Publication Cadence Tracker?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Publication Cadence Tracker need an API key?
- Yes. The registry entry asks for
APIFY_TOKEN. - Is Publication Cadence Tracker maintained?
- The last commit was 2 days ago (2026-11-02). The latest release is v1.3.0.
- How does Publication Cadence Tracker compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 77/100 (higher than 50% of 48,255 servers); tools 1 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.