Gpp MCP server
io.github.mahabubul470/gpp·v0.2.2·2 starsProject knowledge graph with history-checked belief staleness, changeset proposals, cost reporting
2 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Gpp yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Gpp tools
No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-01 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- –Code scanpackage could not be scannedn/a
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 68 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
How Gpp compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 80/100
- higher than 60% of 48,255 servers
- GitHub stars
- 2
- more than 75% of 28,688 servers
Install Gpp in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.
What the publisher says
From the Gpp repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
gpp (git++)
AI agents change code continuously, then lose the work that happened between commits — and the notes they keep about your codebase (CLAUDE.md, memory banks, knowledge files) go stale silently when the code moves on. gpp is a version control system built for that reality: it captures every change as it happens, promotes curated changesets with intent and provenance, and hosts project knowledge on the repo's own history — so when a commit invalidates something you believed about the code, gpp can name that commit.
(Recording is generated by scripts/demo.sh — deterministic, reproducible, no mockups.)
30-second try
cargo install gpp-cli
gpp init --graphex
echo "fn main() {}" > main.rs
gpp timeline # captured already — no staging, no commit
gpp promote -m "first cut" --intent feature
gpp diff HEAD # semantic diff: renames/moves are one opAnd the part no other VCS does — record what you believe about the code, and let history police it:
gpp belief add --claim "token expiry is 24h" --evidence src/auth.rs:7-7
# ...weeks of commits later...
gpp belief bisect "token expiry is 24h"
# INVALIDATED cs:fhcpef7c "raise token expiry to 7 days"
# - 7 | pub const EXPIRY_HOURS: u64 = 24;
# + 7 | pub const EXPIRY_HOURS: u64 = 168;Deterministic — diff intersection and blob hashes, zero LLM or network calls. (For scale: asked to judge whether a stored memory has been invalidated, the best frontier model manages 55.2% accuracy on the STALE benchmark — here it's a history query, not a judgment.) Validated on real history across five repos in four languages — axum 0.6→0.7, flask 1.1→2.0, clap 3→4, zod 3→4, go-redis 8→9 — where every invalidated belief bisects to a pinned, documented culprit commit and the control beliefs survive: see demos/belief-bisect/ for the full matrix.
What makes it different
change (SQLite WAL, debounced watcher); curated changesets are promoted from it with an explicit intent, author kind (human/agent), and cost record. Nothing is lost between commits.
- Continuous capture. A high-frequency timeline records every file
conventions, decisions, and beliefs live in an encrypted knowledge graph inside the repo, tier-gated per agent trust level, audited on every read — and staleness-checked against the history it rides on.
- Graphex: versioned, encrypted project knowledge. Architecture,
scoring, compliance-as-code policies enforced at capture/promote/sync, anomaly detection, and per-changeset token/cost attribution.
- Agent governance. First-class agent identity with reputation
Everything else — P2P sync over Noise, replay, review/RBAC, a relay node, a TUI — is the platform underneath: see docs/ARCHITECTURE.md.
Git is the substrate, not the competition. The bridge (gpp git-import / git-export / git-bridge) round-trips real Git commits, so GitHub and existing workflows keep working — gpp's knowledge, provenance, and governance layers ride alongside. The axum demo above runs entirely on history imported through this bridge.
Connect Claude Code (or any MCP client)
gpp ships an MCP server; agents query the knowledge graph (every belief with a freshness envelope — anchor, commits since, and the changeset that staled it), write their own evidence-anchored beliefs with propose_belief (human-approved, then policed by history), propose changesets, and report costs. Drop this in .mcp.json at your repo root:
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Grade history
- 2026-11-01downgradeA → Bscore 80
Gpp: common questions
- Is Gpp MCP server safe?
- Mostly: it is graded B (80/100). Read the Gpp safety report
- Does Gpp need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Gpp maintained?
- The last commit was 71 days ago (2026-08-25). The latest release is v0.2.2.
- What can I use instead of Gpp?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Codebase Memory MCP server and Neo4j Memory MCP server.
- How does Gpp compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 80/100 (higher than 60% of 48,255 servers); github stars 2 (more than 75% of 28,688 servers). Full comparison.
Alternatives to Gpp
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- Codebase MemoryCodebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.not reviewedWidely usedC
- Neo4j MemoryMCP Neo4j Knowledge Graph Memory Servernot reviewedEstablishedA