Intent-Verified Development (IVD) MCP server
online · 100% uptimeio.github.leocelis/ivd·v3.1.233 tools that make AI write, implement, and verify intent against explicit, testable constraints.
0 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Intent-Verified Development (IVD) yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Intent-Verified Development (IVD) tools
Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-25 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 356ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityauth enforced (unknown)9/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
How Intent-Verified Development (IVD) compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 87/100
- higher than 73% of 48,255 servers
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
- Response time
- 492 ms
- faster than 30% of 30,031 servers
Install Intent-Verified Development (IVD) in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add --transport http ivd https://mcp.ivdframework.dev/mcp
What the publisher says
From the Intent-Verified Development (IVD) repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
Intent-Verified Development (IVD) A framework where AI writes the intent, implements against it, and verifies — so hallucinations are caught and turns drop to one.
→ ivdframework.dev — full docs, hosted server, and access request
New here? Start with judgment_explained.md — a 5-minute, plain-English on-ramp that explains what problem the Judgment phase solves and how, before you read the spec.
The Problem
AI agents hallucinate not because they're bad — but because you're feeding the wrong knowledge system.
Research shows LLMs rely primarily on contextual knowledge (the prompt) over parametric knowledge (training data) — but only when the context is structured and precise (Huang et al., ICLR 2024; 9-LLM contextual vs. parametric study, 2024). When you give vague prose — a PRD, a user story, a chat message — the context channel is underloaded. The model fills the gaps from training. Those gaps are the hallucinations.
Without IVD With IVD
You: "Add CSV export" You: "Add CSV export for compliance"
AI: [builds with wrong columns] AI: [writes intent.yaml with constraints]
You: "No, these columns, ISO dates" You: "Yes, that's what I meant"
AI: [rewrites, still wrong] AI: [implements, verifies against constraints]
You: "Still not right..." You: "Done. First try."
Many turns. Many hallucinations. One turn. Mismatches caught by the constraint check, not by you.IVD saturates the contextual channel with structured, verifiable intent — so the model has nothing to guess.
Quick Start
Works locally. No API key required. Under 5 minutes.
0. See it work first (30 seconds, no setup)
git clone https://github.com/leocelis/ivd.git && cd ivd
python3 examples/intent_demo/run_demo.pyRuns offline. Shows a vague prompt producing a hallucinated implementation, then the same request run against a structured intent artifact — with the constraint check catching the mismatch before you'd ever see it. This is the core loop this README is about; everything below is how to wire it into your own agent.
1. Clone and setup
git clone https://github.com/leocelis/ivd.git
cd ivd
./mcp_server/devops/setup.sh # creates .venv, installs all deps2. Add to your IDE
Important: command must point at the venv's Python — setup.sh installs IVD's dependencies into .venv/, not your system Python. Using "command": "python" here will fail with ModuleNotFoundError. Replace /path/to/ivd with your actual clone path.
Cursor (Settings → Features → MCP):
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Intent-Verified Development (IVD): common questions
- Is Intent-Verified Development (IVD) MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (87/100). Read the Intent-Verified Development (IVD) safety report
- How do I install Intent-Verified Development (IVD)?
- It runs remotely at mcp.ivdframework.dev. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
- Does Intent-Verified Development (IVD) need an API key?
- Yes. The registry entry asks for
Authorization. - Is Intent-Verified Development (IVD) maintained?
- The last commit was 40 days ago (2026-09-25). The latest release is v3.1.2.
- Is Intent-Verified Development (IVD) up?
- 100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
- What can I use instead of Intent-Verified Development (IVD)?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Front-End Checklist MCP server.
- How does Intent-Verified Development (IVD) compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 87/100 (higher than 73% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 492 ms (faster than 30% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.
Alternatives to Intent-Verified Development (IVD)
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- Front-End ChecklistReview frontend code and live pages against 386 quality-gated web development rules.not reviewedWidely usedA