MCP.Market

Laraue Boards MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by laraue.com·com.laraue/boards·v4.0.0

List, view, create, edit, delete, comment on, and see the history of Laraue Boards issues.

A90/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A90/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Laraue Boards yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Laraue Boards tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-01 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 737ms (auth required)20/20
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityauth enforced (unknown)9/15
  • Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year; website matches verified namespace10/10
Overall 90/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Laraue Boards compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
90/100
higher than 83% of 48,255 servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
498 ms
faster than 29% of 30,031 servers

Release history: 7 versions in the registry since 2026-09-22, latest 2026-10-01, typically one every 2 days.

Install Laraue Boards in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http boards https://boards.laraue.com/boards-mcp/mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Laraue Boards repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Laraue.Apps.Boards

The repository contains backend for Task-management Jira-like system.

Interface example

App structure

Laraue.Apps.Boards.DataAccess

The layer that contains models and enums associated with these models

Laraue.Apps.Boards.Services

The layer with services that use other services. Required to encapsulate hard logic mostly in CRD operations. Example: issue creation may update updated_at property, add record to history changes etc. So the service provides the method to create issue.

Note: core services should not manage transactions, but may require them calling context.Database.EnsureTransaction at the top of function.

Laraue.Apps.Boards.WebApiServices

Services to call from WebApi

Laraue.Apps.Boards.TelegramServices

Services to call from TelegramApi

Local run

Check how to deal with the frontend in Frontend Repository

Each host reads its own appsettings.Development.json (gitignored, not the checked-in appsettings.json) for local overrides. A minimal one for Laraue.Apps.Boards.WebApiHost that runs against a local Postgres with no Identity/Billing dependencies (AI summarization still defaults to a local Ollama instance - see below):

{
  "Auth": {
    "Key": "any-local-signing-key"
  },
  "MockExternalServices": true
}

Laraue.Apps.Boards.TelegramHost's only needs the MockExternalServices line (it has its own Telegram:Token to set instead of Auth:Key). See the subsections below for what each setting does and how to point at a real AI/Identity/Billing instance instead.

AI content summarization (local dev)

appsettings.json's AiSummarizer section defaults to a local Ollama instance, since Ollama exposes an OpenAI-compatible /v1/chat/completions endpoint and the summarizer talks to any OpenAI-compatible API. Install Ollama, then pull the model referenced in config:

ollama pull gemma3:12b

Ollama serves on http://localhost:11434 by default once installed. On prod, override AiSummarizer:BaseUrl/AiSummarizer:Model/AiSummarizer:ApiKey to point at a real provider (e.g. DeepSeek) instead.

Running without Identity/Billing

Boards calls out to two other services over gRPC: Laraue.Apps.Identity (global user identity on first login) and Laraue.Apps.Billing (AI token spend/subscription limits). Neither has to be running locally - both hosts' appsettings.Development.json set "MockExternalServices": true, which swaps in in-process fakes for these calls (always succeeds, generous fixed limits, no network traffic) instead of the real gRPC clients. Set it back to false if you actually want to exercise a locally-running Identity/Billing instance.

Create a new user for Test

POST: http://localhost:5200/api/test/user

{
    "username": "winDiezel",
    "languageCode": "ru",
    "firstName": null,
    "lastName": null
}

Auth as user on Test

Make a request GET http://localhost:5200/api/test/user/{userId} to receive a bearer token. Set it in frontend .env file:

NUXT_PUBLIC_TEST_USER_TOKEN=Taken_Token

Permissions arch

Application permissions are divided into two parts:

  1. Entity permissions. Allows to set up access to organization spaces, epics, issues
  2. Organization level. Make set for all entities in one time.
  3. Flexible setup for each space separately. Can be combined with organization level.
  4. Administrative permissions. They allow to set up access for administrative actions like renaming organization.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Laraue Boards: common questions

Is Laraue Boards MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (90/100). Read the Laraue Boards safety report
How do I install Laraue Boards?
It runs remotely at boards.laraue.com. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Laraue Boards need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for X-Api-Key.
Is Laraue Boards maintained?
The last commit was 3 days ago (2026-11-01). The latest release is v4.0.0.
Is Laraue Boards up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
How does Laraue Boards compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 90/100 (higher than 83% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 498 ms (faster than 29% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.