MCP.Market

True Memory Fragments MCP server

by kyle641320·io.github.kyle641320/true-memory-fragments·v0.1.0-rc6·2 stars

Detect stale source context and retain traceable code-chain understanding for AI coding agents.

A85/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A85/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

2 stars49 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed True Memory Fragments yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

True Memory Fragments tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-15 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium
  • Code scan114 source files scanned20/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 22 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

Findings (1)

  • mediumsubprocess with shell=Trueexec.shell-true
    true_memory_fragments-0.1.0rc6/tmf/contracts.py: …son.dumps(payload, ensure_ascii=False), shell=True, text=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, std…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How True Memory Fragments compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
85/100
higher than 70% of 48,255 servers
GitHub stars
2
more than 75% of 28,688 servers
Downloads a week
49
more than 41% of 12,191 servers with a package

Release history: 3 versions in the registry since 2026-09-13, latest 2026-09-23, typically one every 7 days.

Install True Memory Fragments in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add true-memory-fragments -- uvx true-memory-fragments
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the True Memory Fragments repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

True Memory Fragments

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.kyle641320/true-memory-fragments -->

Code changed, but your AI coding agent still remembers the old call chain? TMF is source-bound code memory that flags stale claims and points back to current source.

Try demo · MCP setup · Evidence

30-second paced replay of real deterministic demo output, with labeled source excerpts—not an agent end-to-end test. Reread is requested, not executed.

  • Traceable code relationships: bind call, read, write, inheritance, and API claims to source fingerprints.
  • Explicit stale results: omit stale claims and stop covered graph expansion instead of silently reusing old context.
  • Targeted reread guidance: return source anchors so an agent can check the changed code.

Developer preview: enforcement depends on the host, configuration, and intercepted actions—not automatic blocking of all writes. Fresh does not mean correct; general token savings and production readiness are not established.

Who it is for

  • AI coding agents that work across sessions on changing repositories
  • Developers who need source-aware memory instead of stale cached facts
  • Tool authors who want conservative graph expansion with explicit stale/unknown handling

Validated so far

  • Source-bound freshness and stale-claim detection
  • Hard stale gates that stop unsafe graph expansion
  • Deterministic Python and Java validation
  • Scoped agent experiments demonstrating stale-context prevention

TMF’s core stale-context protection mechanism has been validated in the covered scenarios. Evaluation across more languages, repositories, and long-running production workflows is ongoing.

What TMF is — and is not

TMF is for:

  • AI coding agents working across sessions on changing codebases
  • Preventing stale call-chain and dependency assumptions
  • Source-bound code memory and conservative code-graph navigation
  • Agent integrations that need an explicit stale/unknown result

TMF is not:

  • A general chat-memory product or vector database
  • A replacement for reading source code
  • A guarantee that every claim is correct because it is fresh
  • A proven general productivity or token-saving solution

Fresh means the source binding still matches. Correctness still comes from source and validation.

The repository includes a Java qualification suite: 46/46 qualifiers and 731/731 checks. The historical unreleased audit baseline was 478/478 tests; it is not the current test total. See the version-pinned test verification for historical rc3 and master results, explicit skips, and the intermittent master failure recorded at that time. The rc5 release notes distinguish the newer doctor implementation checks from release validation. These are source-analysis and regression-test results, not a claim of production readiness or a general Agent outcome. Middleware mechanics are validated, and stale-context safety has positive evidence in the GUAVA M10 pre-read experiment. Broader productivity, speed, token savings, and general bug-prevention claims remain unproven. See the authoritative evidence status before making broader claims.

Flow

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Grade history

  • 2026-09-19restoreC → Ascore 85: subprocess with shell=True

True Memory Fragments: common questions

Is True Memory Fragments MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (85/100). Read the True Memory Fragments safety report
How do I install True Memory Fragments?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does True Memory Fragments need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is True Memory Fragments maintained?
The last commit was 42 days ago (2026-09-23). The latest release is v0.1.0-rc6.
What can I use instead of True Memory Fragments?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Deja Vu MCP server and Knowl MCP server.
How does True Memory Fragments compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 85/100 (higher than 70% of 48,255 servers); github stars 2 (more than 75% of 28,688 servers); downloads a week 49 (more than 41% of 12,191 servers with a package). Full comparison.

Alternatives to True Memory Fragments

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Deja Vu
    deja-vu: local memory over the session histories of forty-three coding agents.
    A
  • Knowl
    Persistent memory for AI agents, for code, research and everyday life. Stale facts retire.
    A